Started By
Message

re: Why all the hate for Dabo Swinney?

Posted on 1/19/14 at 1:56 am to
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47824 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 1:56 am to
quote:


Wasn't Auburn the defending National Champs? A team from the Big Bad SEC that teams like Clemson are not supposed to be able to beat? I guess the fans and coaches were supposed to know that Auburn would go 8-5


lol dude get real

everyone knew that Auburn team was average at best at almost every position on the field, and they knew it before the season kicked off. The only reason we even started the season ranked was because of the previous year, and we returned virtually nobody from that team.

In our first game that year we needed a miracle to beat Utah State. In our second game that year we needed a goal line stand to hold off a pretty mediocre MSU squad. At no point did anyone have any delusions that Auburn was anything other than average, and anyone who looked at our schedule could easily have pointed out five losses.

Hell, that team might have been the worst 8-5 team I have ever seen. That defense was as stiff as a wet piece of paper and our QB situation was dreadful after Trotter got a little banged up. Auburn was absolutely blown the frick out by every good team they played that year other than South Carolina, which was a game won solely because Garcia handed us the game on a silver platter, and we still needed every single break known to man to fall our way to come out with that one.
This post was edited on 1/19/14 at 2:00 am
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 2:24 am to
quote:

lol dude get real

everyone knew that Auburn team was average at best at almost every position on the field, and they knew it before the season kicked off. The only reason we even started the season ranked was because of the previous year, and we returned virtually nobody from that team.

In our first game that year we needed a miracle to beat Utah State. In our second game that year we needed a goal line stand to hold off a pretty mediocre MSU squad. At no point did anyone have any delusions that Auburn was anything other than average, and anyone who looked at our schedule could easily have pointed out five losses.

Hell, that team might have been the worst 8-5 team I have ever seen. That defense was as stiff as a wet piece of paper and our QB situation was dreadful after Trotter got a little banged up. Auburn was absolutely blown the frick out by every good team they played that year other than South Carolina, which was a game won solely because Garcia handed us the game on a silver platter, and we still needed every single break known to man to fall our way to come out with that one.


Again, can you read? Clemson fans run onto the field after every single win.

When you beat the defending champ after everyone has been running their mouth about how no one can beat the big bad SEC do more people run out than when you beat The Citadel? Sure, but it happens every game.
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 2:26 am to
quote:

He consistently acts like a jackass. Remember his national championship claim after winning the Chick-fil-A Bowl?


Why do people get hungup so much on that statement? He said LSU was a National Championship caliber team. They were one AJ McCarron-TJ Yeldon screen pass away from playing UGA for a trip to the National Championship Game.

Why is that such an insane statement?
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 3:26 am to
quote:

lol dude get real

everyone knew that Auburn team was average at best at almost every position on the field, and they knew it before the season kicked off. The only reason we even started the season ranked was because of the previous year, and we returned virtually nobody from that team.

In our first game that year we needed a miracle to beat Utah State. In our second game that year we needed a goal line stand to hold off a pretty mediocre MSU squad. At no point did anyone have any delusions that Auburn was anything other than average, and anyone who looked at our schedule could easily have pointed out five losses.

Hell, that team might have been the worst 8-5 team I have ever seen. That defense was as stiff as a wet piece of paper and our QB situation was dreadful after Trotter got a little banged up. Auburn was absolutely blown the frick out by every good team they played that year other than South Carolina, which was a game won solely because Garcia handed us the game on a silver platter, and we still needed every single break known to man to fall our way to come out with that one.

Y'all still beat us though.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 3:27 am to
quote:

Why do people get hungup so much on that statement? He said LSU was a National Championship caliber team. They were one AJ McCarron-TJ Yeldon screen pass away from playing UGA for a trip to the National Championship Game.

Why is that such an insane statement?

Because winning the Chick-fil-A Bowl isn't winning a national title?
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 4:51 am to
quote:

Because winning the Chick-fil-A Bowl isn't winning a national title?


He was referring to LSU. Is English not some of yal's native language?

He was saying LSU is a National Championship caliber team. You really think Dabo was making a case for a two-loss Clemson team to be the National Champ ?

You people suck at flaming.
Posted by McKeezy
Jacksonville, FL
Member since Aug 2010
3940 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 9:08 am to
quote:

-He's removed the Clemsoning label from Clemson. Granted we haven't played our best games possible in some South Carolina games, and FSU this year, and against WVU, but that's not when the Clemsoning term came about. It came about when we lost to the Marylands and Wake Forests of the world. Clemson has won something like 20 straight games against unranked opponents by double digits, second in the nation only to Dabo. Clemson is consistent under Dabo


Jesus Christ
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
48155 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 9:12 am to
quote:

Put Cam Newton on Clemson's 2013 roster, and they more than likely take home the crystal trophy.


does he make up 37 points against one of the best teams of the decade?
Posted by SteveLSU35
Shreveport
Member since Mar 2004
14007 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 10:37 am to
B/c his name is ridiculous.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 10:48 am to
quote:

He is 1-5 against the pride of the state: The University of South Carolina.


And how many BCS bowls has the "pride of the state" been to in the last 10 years compared with Clemson? The answer may shock you.

Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59193 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 11:08 am to
quote:

lol dude get real

everyone knew that Auburn team was average at best at almost every position on the field, and they knew it before the season kicked off. The only reason we even started the season ranked was because of the previous year, and we returned virtually nobody from that team.

In our first game that year we needed a miracle to beat Utah State. In our second game that year we needed a goal line stand to hold off a pretty mediocre MSU squad. At no point did anyone have any delusions that Auburn was anything other than average, and anyone who looked at our schedule could easily have pointed out five losses.


Was Auburn the National Champs the year before or not?

And what makes you think the average fan that rushes the field breaks down every opponent like you just did

The avg fan sees a team that won the NC the year before, they were 2-0 and from the conference that has dominated and is also not shy about reminding people how dominant it has been.

This is an awful lot of arguing over a fanbase rushing the field 3 years ago. In the end who cares, If you think its lame, then don't rush the field.
Posted by craigbiggio
Member since Dec 2009
31805 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 11:10 am to
quote:

And how many BCS bowls has the "pride of the state" been to in the last 10 years compared with Clemson? The answer may shock you.


Both years Clemson made it to the Orange Bowl, South Carolina was clearly a better team. SC doesn't benefit from playing in a weak conference like Clemson does.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59193 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 11:11 am to
quote:

He was referring to LSU. Is English not some of yal's native language?

He was saying LSU is a National Championship caliber team


If the facts don't fit the narrative, we ignore them.
Posted by Roscoe
Member since Sep 2007
2918 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 11:53 am to
quote:

SC doesn't benefit from playing in a weak conference like Clemson does.


You are right, but if USC wouldn't pull a Clemson against inferior teams (UT) or ended up beating teams that Clemson beat in the same season that USC lost to(LSU, UGA), then USC probably would have ended up in a BCS bowl too.

USC fans shouldn't make excuses about their schedule when that "weaker team from across the state" ended up beating some of the same teams that USC lost to.

The LSU's and UGA's are the tough teams that USC has played and lost to the last two years. Regardless of what conference Clemson plays in, they have now shown the last two/three years that when they play out of conference, they can play on the same level as the LSU's, UGA's, Auburns, and Ohio Stats of college football. If those teams wouldn't lose to the scrubs of the SEC East (Kentucky, Vandy, UT, and UF the last few years, what makes anyone think that Clemson would lose to those scrubs as well?

Clemson has one of the best OC in all of college football regardless of what conference they play in. Dabo has signed higher rated classes than probably half of the SEC since he's been the coach at Clemson. Boyd was the MVP of the Army All American game. Watkins was a consensus All American. Ellington and Hopkins were all americans at Clemson and have now shown on the NFL level how talented they were in college as they were both named to the NFL All Rookie team.

Clearly, Clemson has recruited players that are just as good as the top talent in the SEC. Regardless of the fact that Dabo hasn't beaten USC in 5 years, Clemson would probably do just as well as USC has been doing in the SEC the last few years.

Does Clemson have a much easier path to BCS games? Absolutely. But let's not pretend that USC's path there is just leaps and bounds more difficult given the decline in the East the last few years.

This post was edited on 1/19/14 at 12:05 pm
Posted by tigercraig
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2003
3567 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 12:40 pm to
His name is Dabo...
/thread
Posted by craigbiggio
Member since Dec 2009
31805 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 1:14 pm to
quote:

You are right, but if USC wouldn't pull a Clemson against inferior teams (UT) or ended up beating teams that Clemson beat in the same season that USC lost to(LSU, UGA), then USC probably would have ended up in a BCS bowl too.

USC fans shouldn't make excuses about their schedule when that "weaker team from across the state" ended up beating some of the same teams that USC lost to.


My point about ACC being a weak conference is they don't routinely have two powerhouses taking the eligible BCS spots, like LSU/Bama in 2011 or Auburn/Bama this year.

When Clemson Clemsons, they're still more likely to have an available BCS slot because there's rarely two teams still ahead of them in the rankings.

Not that it excuses South Carolina from losing to inferior teams...but it's silly to imply that Clemson is a better team by ignoring their head-to-head record in lieu of BCS appearances.
Posted by CockRocket
Columbia, SC
Member since May 2012
6840 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

And how many BCS bowls has the "pride of the state" been to in the last 10 years compared with Clemson? The answer may shock you.
This is a stupid fricking statement. But it doesn't surprise me given your avi. You've said stupid stuff before though regarding USC.
quote:

South Carolina won't be ranked by the end of the season. They will finish the season with an 8-5 record.
LINK
This post was edited on 1/19/14 at 1:24 pm
Posted by A$AP Cocky
:^)
Member since Jun 2013
4406 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

LSU, UGA and Ohio State are in the ACC? Damn


so he can beat good teams when his team has a month to prepare for the games, awesome.
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47824 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

Again, can you read? Clemson fans run onto the field after every single win.



Again? That was my first post in this thread. And I don't give two shits if Clemson wants to run out for every game, I'm just saying that wasn't a win that anyone would ever consider a "big time win" when actually look at the team you played. Clemson wasn't playing 2010 Auburn, they were playing 2011 Auburn, a far inferior product.
Posted by Korin
Member since Jan 2014
37935 posts
Posted on 1/19/14 at 2:48 pm to
quote:

Both years Clemson made it to the Orange Bowl, South Carolina was clearly a better team. SC doesn't benefit from playing in a weak conference like Clemson does.

South Carolina smashed them and finished higher in the polls both years.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram