- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is your definition of a sport?
Posted on 6/4/14 at 1:59 pm to KosmoCramer
Posted on 6/4/14 at 1:59 pm to KosmoCramer
Yes, yes, no
Anybody who has to sit in that car for three hours in that suit in the middle of summer and drive 200 mph with people 18 inches of you in all directions has to have some sort of athletic ability. I know a lot of you may disagree.
Anybody who has to sit in that car for three hours in that suit in the middle of summer and drive 200 mph with people 18 inches of you in all directions has to have some sort of athletic ability. I know a lot of you may disagree.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:01 pm to lsutigers1992
I agree because the "athlete" has to respond to extenuating circumstances.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:02 pm to lsutigers1992
Nascar racing is a lot more difficult than the casual observer would think..
but my whole thing including nascar as a sport is there are other people hindering your progress. There aren't lanes, it's a free for all. People can get in front of you and block you, people can tap your bumper and spin you out, etc. People are actively trying to inhibit you winning.
but my whole thing including nascar as a sport is there are other people hindering your progress. There aren't lanes, it's a free for all. People can get in front of you and block you, people can tap your bumper and spin you out, etc. People are actively trying to inhibit you winning.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:04 pm to KosmoCramer
Yes. Drive 80 for three hours straight on the Interstate in Houston in an un-air-conditioned car with the windows up and tell me how you feel.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:04 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
Nascar racing is a lot more difficult than the casual observer would think..
You hold and manipulate a tight wheel constantly and make coordinated foot movements for three straight hours in hot arse temps.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:05 pm to lsutigers1992
quote:
Drive 80 for three hours straight on the Interstate in Houston in an un-air-conditioned car with the windows up and tell me how you feel.
Auto racing has a tinsey little bit more to it than that
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:06 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
Auto racing has a tinsey little bit more to it than that
I agree. Just trying to make a point to the non-believers.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:09 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
KosmoCramer
Can we be reasonable people here?
A small step of the front foot does not agility make.
Tennis players do that when they serve. A tennis serve requires no agility. John Isner is both the least agile player in the game and the best server.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:11 pm to TN Bhoy
quote:
Ping Pong
Yes
quote:
quote:
Golf
No
quote:
Bull Fighting
Yes
Wtf
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:12 pm to LSUBoo
quote:
LSUBoo
quote:
ULSU
See above. Try to play the reasonable people game here.
When you argue that batting requires agility, you just lose credibility. What you're saying is objective nonsense.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:15 pm to ULSU
quote:
It does not have to mean a foot movement,
Great point. Typing speed is actually a fantastic metric for agility. Forget cone drills. Put them in front of keyboard.
I'm consistently 55 WPM. I'm agile and worth your while.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:16 pm to ULSU
quote:
It does not have to mean a foot movemen
Stated differently: yes it does.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:19 pm to kidbourbon
quote:
Try to play the reasonable people game here.
Says the guy that just said that batting requires no movement.
quote:
When you argue that batting requires agility, you just lose credibility.
LINK
quote:
Agility or nimbleness is the ability to change the body's position efficiently, and requires the integration of isolated movement skills using a combination of balance, coordination, speed, reflexes, strength, and endurance. Agility is the ability to change the direction of the body in an efficient and effective manner and to achieve this requires a combination of
balance – the ability to maintain equilibrium when stationary or moving (i.e. not to fall over) through the coordinated actions of our sensory functions (eyes, ears and the proprioceptive organs in our joints);
static balance – the ability to retain the centre of mass above the base of support in a stationary position;
dynamic balance – the ability to maintain balance with body movement; speed - the ability to move all or part of the body quickly; strength - the ability of a muscle or muscle group to overcome a resistance; and lastly,
co-ordination – the ability to control the movement of the body in co-operation with the body's sensory functions (e.g., in catching a ball [ball, hand and eye co-ordination]).
Batting takes a shite ton of balance and coordination, also speed, reflexes, and strength. Maybe not the endurance part, unless we're talking a home run derby. So yeah, I think batting successfully requires a lot of agility.
Unless you want to redefine agility.
Or just look at the main line. "Agility is the ability to change the direction of the body in an efficient and effective manner" Adjusting to a pitch and changing your swing to hit it in an efficient and effective manner is pretty much the name of the game.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:19 pm to kidbourbon
quote:
See above. Try to play the reasonable people game here.
When you argue that batting requires agility, you just lose credibility. What you're saying is objective nonsense.
No, you are making up a definition of agility to only include feet movements.
You show one example of a swing. Now go show him fight off an inside fastball and see what his feet and hands do. Show a batter going opposite field with a curve and look at the difference.
This post was edited on 6/4/14 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:20 pm to kidbourbon
quote:
Stated differently: yes it does.
says you
Anyway, MLB batters are still more agile of foot than 95% of all humans. You can't get deep in a stance and move out of the way of a 97 MPH fastball without being very agile (with your feet)
This post was edited on 6/4/14 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:25 pm to ULSU
quote:
No, you are making up a definition of agility to only include feet movements.
You show one example of a swing. Now go show him fight off an side fastball and see what his feet and hands do. Show a batter going opposite field with a curve and look at the difference.
You should just stop. I can't stress enough that what you are saying is objective nonsense, and on every conceivable level.
If you actually believe that batting requires agility. If you actually think that Babe Ruth went yard because he was agile. If you actually think that Bonds was a better hitter at 36 than 23 because he was more agile....then you're retarded and I feel sorry for you.
Because you never want to go FULL retard.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:27 pm to ULSU
Definition of Sport:
Whatever criteria you can randomly come up with that mentally minimizes the necessary skill/athleticism of the sports you don't find interesting.
But seriously, since when has the definition of a sport had anything to do with whether or not the winner is decided objectively?
Whatever criteria you can randomly come up with that mentally minimizes the necessary skill/athleticism of the sports you don't find interesting.
But seriously, since when has the definition of a sport had anything to do with whether or not the winner is decided objectively?
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:28 pm to kidbourbon
quote:
You should just stop. I can't stress enough that what you are saying is objective nonsense, and on every conceivable level.
If you actually believe that batting requires agility. If you actually think that Babe Ruth went yard because he was agile. If you actually think that Bonds was a better hitter at 36 than 23 because he was more agile....then you're retarded and I feel sorry for you.
Because you never want to go FULL retard.
You can huff an puff all you want, but no one else here has agreed with you, and you are completely making up your own definition of agile. You say batting requires no agility? Fine. I just know not to take anything else you say seriously.
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:29 pm to ClientNumber9
OED 1st Edition - "sport is a form of pastime carried on in the open air and involving some amount of bodily exercise."
/////
/////
Posted on 6/4/14 at 2:29 pm to ULSU
quote:
You say batting requires no agility?
I think batting requires agility, but honestly just not that much compared to a lot of other sports.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News