Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

What is the rationale for not having the down by contact rule in college football?

Posted on 11/10/24 at 8:17 pm
Posted by North Dallas Tiger
United States of America
Member since Mar 2024
13008 posts
Posted on 11/10/24 at 8:17 pm
In the NFL, you have to be touched by an opposing player to be considered down.

In college football, a player is down regardless if another player makes contact.
Posted by Domeskeller
Astrodome
Member since Jun 2020
9036 posts
Posted on 11/10/24 at 8:28 pm to
Probably safety reasons. Less chance of someone getting hurt on a play when a player is already on the ground. Probably safety for the guy on the ground and the tackler.

Personally, I’d prefer them let guys continue the play if they’re not touched. But I’m not in charge of college football.
This post was edited on 11/10/24 at 8:30 pm
Posted by JumpingTheShark
America
Member since Nov 2012
24212 posts
Posted on 11/10/24 at 8:30 pm to
Always funny how college players forget they’re not in the league and go to touch a guy that’s down
Posted by Honest Tune
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2011
18208 posts
Posted on 11/10/24 at 8:44 pm to
It’s dumb. There is no good reason.
Posted by Hastings99
Member since Oct 2024
198 posts
Posted on 11/10/24 at 8:44 pm to
i kinda like how it takes the officiating out of it. if the defender smacks the ankles of the ball carrier and he stumbles, but kinda re-gains his balance, then falls down, is he down by "contact?"

it's just easier to defend. if a player is down, he's down. no need to try to be a physicist and determine if the defender's contact made enough impact to force the defender down

Posted by GeorgeTheGreek
Sparta, Greece
Member since Mar 2008
67851 posts
Posted on 11/10/24 at 8:47 pm to
I’m not sure but I prefer college rules. More cut and dry.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
79119 posts
Posted on 11/10/24 at 8:56 pm to
What is the rationale for a player being down but allowed to get back up?
Posted by North Dallas Tiger
United States of America
Member since Mar 2024
13008 posts
Posted on 11/10/24 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

What is the rationale for a player being down but allowed to get back up?
touche
Posted by POTUS2024
Member since Nov 2022
20943 posts
Posted on 11/11/24 at 12:46 am to
I thought part of it was to prevent the trickeration from a ball carrier hiding behind the line by getting on the ground / taking a knee, only to spring up later and throw the ball or whatever - sort of like the fumble-roosky or whatever it's called.

Back in the old days of leather helmets, didn't they have 4 person backfield where they would snap the ball and everyone in the backfield would huddle with the ball, almost taking a knee, then spring out in different directions and it was hard to figure out who had the ball?
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
38018 posts
Posted on 11/11/24 at 2:30 am to
quote:


In the NFL, you have to be touched by an opposing player to be considered down.


And usually a ceremonial tap which is stupid.

CFB (mostly) adheres to the original rules.

You gotta stay upright,...that's the game.
Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
2700 posts
Posted on 11/11/24 at 5:00 am to
I prefer college rules.

Down is down.
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
9659 posts
Posted on 11/11/24 at 8:32 am to
I like the pro games having rules that make the game a little more difficult than college.
the games should step up in difficulty as you climb the ranks

football:
down without contact
one foot in bounds on a catch

basketball:
deeper three point line

baseball
wood bats instead of aluminum/composite

etc.
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
29370 posts
Posted on 11/11/24 at 8:44 am to
quote:

But I’m not in charge of college football.


Thanks for clarifying.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
36803 posts
Posted on 11/11/24 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

a little more difficult than college.


quote:

down without contact


More difficult for whom?
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
9659 posts
Posted on 11/11/24 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

More difficult for whom?


difficult is probably not the correct word, pretty much every body.

got a guy wide the off open down field?
have to hit him in stride so he doesn't have to dive or stumble, etc., or he'll be down where he catches it.

guy crossing the middle has to go down to his knees to catch it?
better touch him or it's still a live play.

it's an added level that all sides need to be aware of on any given play.

Posted by TouchedTheAxeIn82
near the Apple spaceship
Member since Nov 2012
6307 posts
Posted on 11/11/24 at 3:50 pm to

I like having minor rules differences between the college and pro game. This, plus the one foot / two foot rule difference for receptions are the first things that come to mind. Having some minor differences adds interest to me for viewing both sports.

Another difference that I hope stays different is that I hope that the college game never adopts the NFL's lame new kickoff rules.
Posted by kciDAtaE
Member since Apr 2017
16655 posts
Posted on 11/11/24 at 4:26 pm to
I prefer college PI penalty yardage. Especially the way the refs call it nowadays.
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
16871 posts
Posted on 11/11/24 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

i kinda like how it takes the officiating out of it. if the defender smacks the ankles of the ball carrier and he stumbles, but kinda re-gains his balance, then falls down, is he down by "contact?"

it's just easier to defend. if a player is down, he's down. no need to try to be a physicist and determine if the defender's contact made enough impact to force the defender down



Exactly. I wish NFL had the college rule. If you're down, you're down. It's like stepping out of bounds.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram