Started By
Message

re: What if there were 8 teams in the college football playoffs?

Posted on 12/9/14 at 12:38 pm to
Posted by TN_Tigers
West Tennessee
Member since Feb 2013
7193 posts
Posted on 12/9/14 at 12:38 pm to
It varies from year to year but this time the least amount of scrutiny would of came from a 6 team playoff.

8 team would have been Ole Miss/Moo State debate and 2 team would have been Oregon/FSU debate.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
22079 posts
Posted on 12/9/14 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

Getting shutout 30-0 to Arkansas is not something you can just overlook.
oops...forgot about that...screw Ole Miss.

Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
22079 posts
Posted on 12/9/14 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

It varies from year to year but this time the least amount of scrutiny would of came from a 6 team playoff.
if we are stuck with 5 power conferences, then 6 is the logical next step. Six allows for all 5 conference champions to get in if they are all worthy, plus the best at-large.

eight would be great, but not necessary initially...but money will win out, and four first round games better than two.
This post was edited on 12/9/14 at 12:41 pm
Posted by Richard Castle
St. George, La.
Member since Nov 2012
1888 posts
Posted on 12/9/14 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

Looks pretty good. First two rounds should be on campus at the better seed.
Posted by SystemsGo
Member since Oct 2014
2774 posts
Posted on 12/9/14 at 1:50 pm to
Why imagine an 8 team playoff? Stay. At. Four.
Posted by FootballNostradamus
Member since Nov 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 12/9/14 at 2:11 pm to
Love the idea of the first round on campus and then going to the current rotating bowl setup. Need to incentivize being a high seed and would help travel issues.

Make it happen!
Posted by tiderider
Member since Nov 2012
7703 posts
Posted on 12/9/14 at 2:22 pm to
2012 would've been tough, also ...

Posted by Bags of Milk
The Sunny Beaches of Canada
Member since Feb 2013
3327 posts
Posted on 12/9/14 at 2:23 pm to
This makes for way better matchups than the current bowl system and would be far more fun to watch on TV.

The day we get a round of 16 with 8 top 16 matchups across a weekend will be couch nirvana
Posted by Celery
Nuevo York
Member since Nov 2010
11109 posts
Posted on 12/9/14 at 2:32 pm to
I think Bama and Miss St. would play for it all
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84056 posts
Posted on 12/9/14 at 2:36 pm to
As much as I have said I don't want an 8-team playoff, I must say that bracket looks pretty badass.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85487 posts
Posted on 12/9/14 at 2:40 pm to
I don't see how 6 will ever happen. Giving a team a first round bye is just way, way too much of an advantage.

As for 8 teams, I believe it would take too much away from the regular season. I cannot think of a single instance where the #8 team in the country has a legitimate claim to be deserving of the national championship. The playoffs should be just big enough to capture the absolute best teams in the country, and 8 is too many.
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
34531 posts
Posted on 12/9/14 at 3:52 pm to
Yes. There will always be snubs. There are 68 teams allowed into the NCAA tourney and there are still complaints.

It will not stop, ever.
Posted by TheBuescherMan
Abu Dhabi
Member since May 2013
1231 posts
Posted on 12/9/14 at 3:57 pm to
That would have been an epic postseason. I don't see how anyone could argue that Michigan St (assuming the "least qualified" team on that list wins it) would be an unworthy national champion with a 13-2 record with wins over Bama, Ohio St, and Oregon.

It would be difficult to put the right 10-2 teams in it most years, though. But it would always make for an great tournament.
This post was edited on 12/9/14 at 3:58 pm
Posted by SwaggerCopter
H TINE HOL IT DINE
Member since Dec 2012
27233 posts
Posted on 12/9/14 at 3:59 pm to
Bama is cruising.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
22079 posts
Posted on 12/9/14 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

I don't see how 6 will ever happen. Giving a team a first round bye is just way, way too much of an advantage
well, the NFL does it.

But 6, as logical as it sounds, would create a storm of controversy too (who deserves the byes? Who is getting left out).

8 would be great too. The reason that 8 is legit is because we get to validate the top teams. The teams are forced to play other top teams...since schedules are not the same across all the teams and conference strengths differ, you would force the cream to rise. Win three straight against the perceived best teams to earn the crown.

Posted by Weaver
Madisonville, LA
Member since Nov 2005
27750 posts
Posted on 12/9/14 at 5:14 pm to
Number 9 and 10 would be bitching.
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41819 posts
Posted on 12/9/14 at 5:28 pm to
quote:

. Giving a team a first round bye is just way, way too much of an advantage



...like...in...the...NFL?
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
11277 posts
Posted on 12/9/14 at 7:30 pm to
I think 8 is the perfect number. Still think the committee has too much say.

5 conference champs + 3 wildcards would be cool.
Posted by WeagleAU
My house
Member since Oct 2014
1693 posts
Posted on 12/9/14 at 7:34 pm to
I think it will add teams soon. But it's not going to matter 4 or 8 or 65. Someone will be left out.

Look at NCAA basketball tournament. Always two-three teams complaining.
Posted by seinfeldtiger
San Diego
Member since Sep 2009
1718 posts
Posted on 12/9/14 at 8:34 pm to
How Many games do you want college kids to play?? 15 games for championship is even too much.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram