Started By
Message

re: US High School Girl Runs 9:17 for 2 Miles

Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:54 am to
Posted by RandySavage
9 Time Natty Winner
Member since May 2012
35500 posts
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:54 am to
When we turned them into single sport robots at the age of 6 and took their childhoods away and spent their college savings money on training in the hopes it would turn into a scholarship one day
Posted by Pedro
Geaux Hawks
Member since Jul 2008
39153 posts
Posted on 6/11/25 at 9:10 am to
I’ll co-sign that. Distance running is a little different though. From my experience not many of these kids started specializing in running until later. Hell our top female runner in Kansas right now (Junior from Topeka Seaman, Ryin Miller) plays soccer in the middle of her track season. With running I just think training and nutrition have evolved along with the level of competition increasing to push kids to do more. In our region we usually get assigned to for xc it takes damn near sub 16 in the 5k to get out on the boys side and a 20:20 didn’t make it out on the girls this last year. 2 years ago I had a girl qualify running 21:10.
Posted by dallastiger55
Jennings, LA
Member since Jan 2010
34204 posts
Posted on 6/11/25 at 9:13 am to
quote:

Cooper Lutkenhaus


He will be a name everyone knows after the next two Olympics.

Phenom
Posted by RandySavage
9 Time Natty Winner
Member since May 2012
35500 posts
Posted on 6/11/25 at 10:40 am to
I was going to ask, how often do these high school phenoms pan out long term? Is it a good chance Jane Hedengren or Parker Valby from Florida last year will become Olympic medal favorites or is it still kind of a crap shoot?
Posted by Tubedog13
Member since May 2009
3660 posts
Posted on 6/11/25 at 10:49 am to
quote:

I was going to ask, how often do these high school phenoms pan out long term?


Most don't. Look up the high school sub 4 minute milers from the last 20 years and there are only a very few that won an NCAA title or did anything internationally.
Posted by RandySavage
9 Time Natty Winner
Member since May 2012
35500 posts
Posted on 6/11/25 at 11:10 am to
I watched two high school kids go sub 4 a couple of week ago at Huntsville, pretty crazy.

Are these kids training too hard too soon or just biology takes over or what?
Posted by Pedro
Geaux Hawks
Member since Jul 2008
39153 posts
Posted on 6/11/25 at 11:37 am to
quote:

training too hard too soon
my unscientific opinion is this. A lot of these kids end up injury liabilities in college. There’s definitely a perfect medium when dealing with high school runners that are still growing and maturing. There’s definitely way more I could be doing with some of mine but I don’t want them getting to college broken and battered and unable to improve. I have a boy right now that just went 4:15 and has potential to go under 15:20 in xc this year that I’m having to really work to reign in some. Kid’s hungry as heck to be successful and just wants to do more and more which I love but I don’t want him to be broken and barely holding on when he makes it to the next level.
This post was edited on 6/11/25 at 11:38 am
Posted by NOLALGD
Member since May 2014
2755 posts
Posted on 6/11/25 at 4:23 pm to
quote:


Holy frick. I now truly feel de-masulinated. If that’s a word.

I was 20 before I hit sub 9:40.


Yep, in the mid 90s in LA if you got anywhere close to or under a 10 min 3200 you were getting at least a little bit of money to run in college.
Posted by tigercross
Member since Feb 2008
5067 posts
Posted on 6/11/25 at 5:24 pm to
quote:

I was going to ask, how often do these high school phenoms pan out long term? Is it a good chance Jane Hedengren or Parker Valby from Florida last year will become Olympic medal favorites or is it still kind of a crap shoot?


Valby won't be a medal threat, but it's not because she trained too hard, too early. She just isn't good enough. There were at least 4 women last year who could lap her in an all-out 10k. Hedengren still has time to improve, but there are a lot of women who could run her 2 mile pace for 3k, then speed up the last 2k.
Posted by Pedro
Geaux Hawks
Member since Jul 2008
39153 posts
Posted on 6/11/25 at 5:27 pm to
10ks a weird race sometimes. If we get one of those years where it turns more tactical I could see her sniping a 3 spot potentially. Plus I’m not sure her potentials been tapped into fully with the way she trained at Florida. I know she did a shite ton of cross training but still.
Posted by tigercross
Member since Feb 2008
5067 posts
Posted on 6/11/25 at 7:42 pm to
True. Battocletti medaled in Paris and I don’t see any reason Valby can’t pull that off one day. Just have to hope the East Africans stupidly allow the race to go 30:30+
Posted by Pedro
Geaux Hawks
Member since Jul 2008
39153 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 5:54 am to
Something like last nights ncaa 10k.


What a shite race
Posted by PurpleandGold Motown
Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Oct 2007
24384 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

Most don't. Look up the high school sub 4 minute milers from the last 20 years and there are only a very few that won an NCAA title or did anything internationally.


Track isn't really a glamor sport, and training is boring and solitary. A lot of people just decide that the juice isn't worth the squeeze at some point. If you aren't an Olympic hopeful it becomes tough to justify the sacrifice. Most sports at least have a crowd or teammates to push you on. Track and Field is just you for the most part. Swimming is the only other sport that I can think of off the top my head that is that much of a solo pursuit.
Posted by Globetrotter747
Member since Sep 2017
5687 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

Track isn't really a glamor sport

Sprinting is but only during the Olympics or when a 100/200 meter world record is threatened or broken.

quote:

Swimming is the only other sport that I can think of off the top my head that is that much of a solo pursuit.

Nearly any athletic freak of nature with the tall, lean frame of a swimmer would be a fool to pursue the sport. Unless you turn out to be Michael Phelps, there’s no money or fame in it and no one will give a shite what you do except for two weeks every four years when the five rings in the background make the sport briefly relevant.

Just as bad, there’s no skill transfer because swimming the fricking butterfly is worthless in every other sport. Someone who is blessed with great speed and developed it at least has a chance to do something else if he’s not quite world class level because speed is widely valued in sports.
Posted by Keys Open Doors
In hiding with Tupac & XXXTentacion
Member since Dec 2008
32892 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 1:18 pm to
How are they putting up so much better times in the 800, 1500, and 2 mile now in your opinion?

800 has been especially crazy at the senior level in the past two years.

For the marathon, the shoes are definitely making a difference, right? The EPO usage was much more out of control 25-28 years ago. No doubt the senior level guys are micro dosing but they are now beating records that seemed untouchable even a few years ago.

Are they shaving off a second for even the 800 now?
This post was edited on 6/12/25 at 1:23 pm
Posted by Keys Open Doors
In hiding with Tupac & XXXTentacion
Member since Dec 2008
32892 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 1:30 pm to
Kris Humphries agrees.

He was in the same competitions with Ryan Lochte and Michael Phelps while he was 11 or 12 and even beat them at times.

Clearly he stopped swimming competitively soon after.
Posted by Tubedog13
Member since May 2009
3660 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 1:36 pm to
Commenting from my original post yesterday, Colin Sahlman ran 3:56 in high school 3 years ago and didn't qualify for the ncaa final yesterday in the 1500. I understand it was a tactical race but still, his best finish was 4th last year and these are against guys that didnt run nearly as fast as him in high school. Most of these guys have college type training in high school so don't improve much once they get to college.
Posted by Zappas Stache
Utility Muffin Research Kitchen
Member since Apr 2009
43133 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Track isn't really a glamor sport, and training is boring and solitary. A lot of people just decide that the juice isn't worth the squeeze at some point. If you aren't an Olympic hopeful it becomes tough to justify the sacrifice. Most sports at least have a crowd or teammates to push you on. Track and Field is just you for the most part.


This is such an ignorant statement. Did you run track? The guys/girls you train with become close friends and having them next to you during training and racing gives you the same feeling of comradery as any other sport. I never felt training was boring. Really difficult? Yes but training for most sports is difficult. I wasn't an Olympic hopeful but I had goals and pushed myself to try and meet those goals just like an athlete in any other sport. Swimming is the exact same way. I swim now with a Masters Team that has people competing in swim meets and triathlons and the social aspect of having a group of friends to train with makes the tough workouts much easier.
Posted by Pedro
Geaux Hawks
Member since Jul 2008
39153 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 2:57 pm to
I mean shoes probably play a small role but I think it’s more training honestly. We know so much more about effective training now than we did even 10 years ago.
Posted by Pedro
Geaux Hawks
Member since Jul 2008
39153 posts
Posted on 6/12/25 at 3:00 pm to
I actually agree with both statements honestly. While you’re right about the training component with people like me and you (you more so than me given your times and such) we’re also a rare breed that really love this sport. Coaching kids now that statement is somewhat true. I have such a hard time getting kids to come out that have proven their good at the sport because they want to go do other shite that gets more likes and views on tik tok. It sucks but it is what it is.

Case in point; last year I had a kid that was 17 low as a sophomore quit xc so he could focus on basketball. He was a JV starter and played maybe 10 varsity minutes all year. I know 17 low isn’t setting the world on fire or anything but he was starting to put some things together training wise and I think would’ve been running 16:30 or so the next season had he stuck with it.
This post was edited on 6/12/25 at 3:04 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram