True or False: Tulane would have given Georgia a better game.

Tulane would have gotten boat raced too so false

False.

I think Tulane would have gotten that arse beat by 30

Which technically is a lot better than how TCU did

quote:

---

I think the score speaks for itself. Physically, TCU was inferior and didn’t have the size, strength or speed to matchup with Georgia at any position. They looked like a freshman or JV high school team out there.

---

do you think Kent State has much better athletes than TCU? because they gave Georgia a much better game.

There is more to football games than 5 star talent. Tulane was 2-10 last year and went 12-2 this year and beat USC.

quote:

---

right, like how much the 5 star talent cares about a game.

---

yep. maybe if Alabama's players cared more they would have made the playoffs.

quote:

---

True. But also TCU couldve given Georgia a better game.

---

TCU probably left a score or two on the field, but their Defense is really bad, has been all season, and was completely overmatched. They were ranked in the 80s in total D, 50s in scoring D, and went up against the most talented offense they’ve seen.

False, similar result to Georgia Tech vs Cumberland College in 1916.

LSU would've beaten Tulane, USC had Zero defense...

always remember...tuck fulane

quote:

---

Would Tulane have been more competitive than TCU?

---

More competitive than TCU last night? Probably so.

But TCU played an awful game. Their players were clearly nervous from the opening whistle to the point that they weren’t even celebrating their few positive plays early. Dykes even said as much.

UGA is a lot better than TCU, but I don’t think they’re 59 points better.