- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:18 pm to shel311
The thing is if he didn't extend the ball it wouldn't have hit the ground.
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 3:19 pm
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:18 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Wtf are these people that are saying yes seeing?
a catch
2 feet in
and a football move
aka, a completed catch
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:18 pm to DelU249
He didn't finish it and completely secure the ball and come up with it all the way through.
Incomplete.
Incomplete.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:18 pm to KillerNut9
quote:
If the ground can't cause a fumble then it shouldn't be able to cause an incompletion either. This is fricking stupid.
Pretty much.
the ground shouldnt be able to cause an incompletion? do you realize what you are saying? i dont think you mean that
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:18 pm to DelU249
No
It may not be fair but you must maintain possession all the way through. Its in the rules.
After last week the cowboys don't deserve to bitch about poor play calls.
Rolly Pack.
It may not be fair but you must maintain possession all the way through. Its in the rules.
After last week the cowboys don't deserve to bitch about poor play calls.
Rolly Pack.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:19 pm to shel311
They just clarified on TV that he was going to the ground during the act (dive or not) and that it wasn't confirmed a football act. The steps weren't the issue. It's the "process". Which once the ball hit the ground and came out made it incomplete (ground can cause an incomplete pass vs. a fumble situation).
As said, shitty rule but it's a rule nonetheless.
As said, shitty rule but it's a rule nonetheless.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:19 pm to DelU249
Yea the rules are wrong in this instance because of intent. The dude caught the ball took 3 steps and had an elbow touch the ground before he reached for the goal line.
I hate the cowboys but he clearly had possession and was trying to score. Bad rule in this case.
I hate the cowboys but he clearly had possession and was trying to score. Bad rule in this case.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:19 pm to Sentrius
quote:How many steps and/or dives are needed?
He didn't finish it and completely secure the ball and come up with it all the way through.
Incomplete.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:19 pm to DelU249
Yes
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:19 pm to shel311
Yea I hate dallas and I got mad when they overturned..... Definition of catch right there
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:19 pm to shel311
quote:
How many steps and/or dives are needed
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:20 pm to ButchItUp
quote:
but you must maintain possession all the way through.
only if a catch hasn't been completed
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:20 pm to shel311
Catch, and I hate the Cowboys.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:20 pm to DelU249
definitely a catch
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
aka, a completed catch
Not to mention, they REVERSED that call.
Terrible.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:20 pm to shel311
quote:
How many steps and/or dives are needed?
The momentum of the catch brought him to the ground, it was ruled correctly.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:20 pm to shel311
quote:
How many steps and/or dives are needed
the thing is that the rule is vague enough to where plays like this happen its spin spin spin rule rule rule and nothing gets changed
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:21 pm to shel311
quote:
How many steps and/or dives are needed?
that's waht i keep asking
Page 7 of 47
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News