Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:03 pm to
Posted by cardswinagain
Member since Jun 2013
13251 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:03 pm to
No
Posted by goldenbadger08
Sorting Out MSB BS Since 2011
Member since Oct 2011
37909 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:03 pm to
Nope.
Posted by LSU alum wannabe
Katy, TX
Member since Jan 2004
27595 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:03 pm to
5 years ago? Yes. Today? No.

Completion of process of catch? How long has that rule been a focus? I think 5 years.
Posted by xenythx
Member since Dec 2007
33251 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:03 pm to
I think he caught it, but it's not a catch according to the NFL's dumb rules.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
59275 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:03 pm to
That should be a catch.
Posted by LSUMJ
BR
Member since Sep 2004
20643 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:03 pm to
I hate dallas but thats a stupid rule. U are contacted and u fall down. Who cares what happens 3 seconds later
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
17112 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:03 pm to
YEs.
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
79447 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:04 pm to



ETA You should know better, fox.
This post was edited on 1/11/15 at 3:04 pm
Posted by jpbTiger
Tampa FL
Member since Dec 2007
5030 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:04 pm to
Yes, catch. I want to see Dallas lose, but not that way....
Posted by CunningLinguist
Dallas, TX
Member since Mar 2006
19175 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:04 pm to
No
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91386 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

No... Didn't complete the catch.


LOL wtf are you people smoking. The catch was complete on every level. He reached for the goal line and it popped out. That is a football move by every definition. It was a catch. Plain and simple.
Posted by LSUmakemewanna
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2010
1755 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:04 pm to
(no message)
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:04 pm to
Actually before Calvin Johnson


That just brought it to everyone's attention
Posted by ctiger69
Member since May 2005
31030 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:04 pm to
No
Posted by I-59 Tiger
Vestavia Hills, AL
Member since Sep 2003
36886 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:04 pm to
Yes it was a catch and I'm for Green Bay.
Posted by LSUmakemewanna
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2010
1755 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:05 pm to
Dude caught it. Then went for the dive for the TD. Catch. Yes.
Posted by Melvin
Member since Apr 2011
23535 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

ETA You should know better, fox.
That's not the same
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:05 pm to
They distinguish that one because he had control and crossed the line

The play is over before it is kicked out
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:06 pm to
Not the same thing at all.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112650 posts
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

How is there even a debate? Under NFL rules, it's not a catch. No grey area.

I mean, he caught the ball, took 3 steps, and was diving into the endzone.

It's certainly up for debate, even by the shitty rule.
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 47
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 47Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram