- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:33 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:
Is Oregon getting healthier?
I hope so.
Hoping the take care of Stanford with weekend, then need Stanford to take care of Notre Dame.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:33 pm to castorinho
quote:
Last year I really liked the committee's approach, this year they've been all over the place.
Same.
Way too much eye test this season. Eye test should have zero impact on these rankings. None.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:34 pm to dcrews
the most alarming thing said was that the committee had the most difficulty ranking 5-8.
so teams #1-4 were solid and then #9 LSU was also solid - which means LSU wasnt even considered to be ranked higher - pretty hilarious
so teams #1-4 were solid and then #9 LSU was also solid - which means LSU wasnt even considered to be ranked higher - pretty hilarious
This post was edited on 11/10/15 at 6:35 pm
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:34 pm to BayouBengals03
i also thought the committee was going to talk about intelligent things and how to weight various factors appropriately independent of a computer.
instead, they are all just old fricks talking about the eye test it seems.
instead, they are all just old fricks talking about the eye test it seems.
This post was edited on 11/10/15 at 6:35 pm
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:36 pm to rocket31
The fact that jackass was making excuses for Stanford's loss on national tv
Look, I understand LSU got dominated on Saturday. But, in all honesty, Alabama is just a bad matchup for LSU. We do the same thing, they just do it better. The committee doesn't see that, they just see a big Alabama win.
Which is why eye test shouldn't have anything to do with this. These dudes aren't qualified enough to use the eye test.
Look, I understand LSU got dominated on Saturday. But, in all honesty, Alabama is just a bad matchup for LSU. We do the same thing, they just do it better. The committee doesn't see that, they just see a big Alabama win.
Which is why eye test shouldn't have anything to do with this. These dudes aren't qualified enough to use the eye test.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:36 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
quote:
instead, they are all just old fricks talking about the eye test it seems.
fricking exactly
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:37 pm to rocket31
quote:Lsu has better wins and SOS than Notre dame. And one is 4 and the other is 9. No logical explanation
or maybe ND and Bama have better wins against the top 25 than the others?
plus they both have great SOS
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:37 pm to rocket31
quote:
so teams #1-4 were solid and then #9 LSU was also solid - which means LSU wasnt even considered to be ranked higher - pretty hilarious
Yeah, but it seems like teams 5-8 control their destiny a little more than LSU, so I can see why it's easy to put LSU a little further out.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:39 pm to lsupride87
quote:do we have a link to find SOS?
Lsu has better wins and SOS than Notre dame
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:39 pm to lsupride87
quote:
Lsu has better wins and SOS than Notre dame.
what SOS is the committee using? anyone know?
I can safely assume NDs is considered stronger (they had it at #12)
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:39 pm to Plankton
tRant is absolutely freaking out because LSU is #9 & Iowa is #5. It's like some of them expected the committee to go easy on us after that absurd performance.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:40 pm to Plankton
quote:
so I can see why it's easy to put LSU a little further out.
Didn't stop them last year when they had TCU over Baylor and Ohio State all year
Again, inconsistency.
This post was edited on 11/10/15 at 6:41 pm
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:40 pm to Plankton
quote:
but it seems like teams 5-8 control their destiny a little more than LSU, so I can see why it's easy to put LSU a little further out.
fair point
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:40 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:Bruh, 9am Pacific time!!!
The fact that jackass was making excuses for Stanford's loss on national tv
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:41 pm to JBeam
I'm one of those people, to be honest.
Stanford looked awful and got embarrassed by Northwestern, yet the committee chair makes excuses on TV for them.
Doesn't make sense.
Stanford looked awful and got embarrassed by Northwestern, yet the committee chair makes excuses on TV for them.
Doesn't make sense.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:42 pm to BayouBengals03
WE TALKING ABOUT GAME TIME FOLKS!
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:43 pm to BeYou
Jeff Long should be embarrassed.
I hope LSU shoves it up Arkansas' arse on Saturday.
I hope LSU shoves it up Arkansas' arse on Saturday.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:44 pm to JBeam
quote:
tRant is absolutely freaking out because LSU is #9 & Iowa is #5. It's like some of them expected the committee to go easy on us after that absurd performance.
Gotta love tRant
What's gonna be even funnier is the melt when everything falls in place for LSU to grab a playoff spot (assuming Bama wins out) and the committee leaves LSU out because they don't want to see a rematch.
Posted on 11/10/15 at 6:44 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:Should we really crucify a team for not looking amazing in week one? I don't think so.
Stanford looked awful and got embarrassed by Northwestern, yet the committee chair makes excuses on TV for them.
Page 7 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News