Started By
Message

re: The split is here to stay-deal with it

Posted on 12/15/13 at 1:51 pm to
Posted by Wild Thang
YAW YAW Fooball Nation
Member since Jun 2009
44181 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Why is giving four more teams of kids a chance to be a state champion wrong?


Let's just make sure everyone wins something. No reason for there to be any loser.

The kids should all be winners!!!

lol
Posted by GhostofJackson
Speedy Teflon Wizard
Member since Nov 2009
7230 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 1:53 pm to
I still don't understand why you are upset they have depth.
Posted by sugar71
NOLA
Member since Jun 2012
9967 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

. No one complained when Evangel was killing everyone in 5a. It


This is the reason why we are here because Larger class schools voted to force these football factories to play down to their enrollment in 2004.

Curtis dominated 2-A for a couple decades but within a decade of them & Evangel playing up the larger schools complained & had them voted down.

Have we already forgotten Evangel & Curtis were voted out of 4 & 5-A in 2003 or '04? The big boys didn't want them for financial(splitting gates with schools with tiny fan bases) & probably football as well.


This post was edited on 12/15/13 at 2:02 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290826 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 2:05 pm to
They couldn't force John Curtis to move down and not Evangel.

Posted by sugar71
NOLA
Member since Jun 2012
9967 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

They couldn't force John Curtis to move down and not Evangel.


I don't have the vote breakdown , but I am sure a huge chunk of 142 votes to boot out Evangel & Curtis came from 5-A . Curtis never won nor played for a 5-A title.

The vote was 142-136 I believe & I am certain that very few if any 1 , 2 or 3-A schools voted for Evangel & Curtis to play 1 & 2-A ball.

It was both 4 & 5-A schools behind that.


Stop with this absurd myth that 5-A had absolutely no issue with 1 & 2-A enrollment football factories (with different rules)playing up.

Posted by wtiger09
Member since Nov 2013
45 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 2:37 pm to
quote:

The split is here to stay-deal with it quote: Maybe he's talking about winnfield. Aren't they the only football school in Winn parish. Well, I didn't want to name names, but yes, allegedly there are 3 high schools in Winn Parish that don't compete in football and Winnfield High supposedly is allowed to take students outside of their attendance zone if they declare that they want to play football (since it holds the parish's monopoly on football), and then those students also don't have to lose a year of eligibility either when transferring. In other words, they allegedly get the advantage of taking players from parish-wide and all of the school system's football resources are concentrated at Winnfield--instead of being split over 4 high schools. Does anyone know if this is all true? Seems to make Winnfield look like it is "selective" in its own way, at least when it comes to playing football. I know that Winnfield has been pushing for the split, but if this info is true, I guess I'm just confused as to how they aren't considered a "select" school themselves.

We a had student that transferred from Atlanta and had to sit out a couple of years ago, unless something has changed if they transfer in high school they have to sit.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
44889 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 2:47 pm to
What they should have done is seperate football from the other sports. Football is the only sport you are allowed to play up in.
Posted by GhostofJackson
Speedy Teflon Wizard
Member since Nov 2009
7230 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 2:49 pm to
I think it moot now because they have found the solution they want. Let every class vote separately on if they want to split. Only 3a will probably split.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
290826 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 2:49 pm to
well get back to me if you can find it. I cant

all i can find is that 4A voted Curtis down with a 32-2 vote
Posted by Benw225
Member since Feb 2013
944 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

Our Principal has more "principles" than all
of you ignoramuses who continue to attack her.

This troll can't be serious. Can an Admin ban him from the board? I think we have all had enough of his stupid Winnfield shite
Posted by diablo blanco
Oakdale, Louisiana
Member since Dec 2007
1112 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 9:11 pm to
That doesn't happen?

ETA- Property tax resolutions are voted on by everyone registered to vote, not just property owners.
This post was edited on 12/15/13 at 9:38 pm
Posted by diablo blanco
Oakdale, Louisiana
Member since Dec 2007
1112 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 9:23 pm to
I'm not sure how to respond to your posts.
You obviously are a private school grad or a big fan of one.

Do you propose that select schools gain no advantage from having open enrollment, scholarships, etc.
Posted by diablo blanco
Oakdale, Louisiana
Member since Dec 2007
1112 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 9:35 pm to
I agree there may be too many classes/divisions.
I don't agree that all schools should be grouped together based solely on enrollment numbers.

Students that live in the school district where they attend school are who public, non-select schools have on their rosters. If you believe private schools don't recruit or have students on their rosters that live outside their district, you are not a realist. I understand that some rules are broken on both sides.
This post was edited on 12/15/13 at 9:39 pm
Posted by Cajunese
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
7186 posts
Posted on 12/15/13 at 10:31 pm to
At the end of the day, there will always be a complaint of where Curtis ends up. Whether it is 1A or 5A, schools from those classes will complain and moan of how it's not fair that they have to play Curtis.

But what about everyone else? Division I this season consisted of the Catholic League and four other teams. Everyone from that division made playoffs regardless of their record.

In Division 4, Vermillion Catholic faced a team that finished 4th place in their district with 4 losses (St. Frederick). That same team beat a hot Southern Lab team a week earlier who was a dismal 3-7 on the season. Southern Lab probably wouldn't have even made the playoffs in the old system.

A total of 88 teams made the playoffs this season without a winning record. Now, please try justifying this for me. All in all, this system is a joke. To have NINE state championships in a state 1/6 the size of Texas is absurd.

Call me crazy, but I would just say to put the likes of Curtis and Evangel in 5A, tell those 5A schools to suck it up and deal with it, go back to the old format, and just move on.

All of this "everyone is a winner" crap is an example of what is bringing our country down.

[End rant]
Posted by TheDude321
Member since Sep 2005
3268 posts
Posted on 12/16/13 at 10:30 am to
quote:

I agree there may be too many classes/divisions.
I don't agree that all schools should be grouped together based solely on enrollment numbers.


Well, that's the problem--people want to lump all of the schools into only 2 groups: "select" and "non-select" schools. The reality is that the formats of all of the schools are way too complex to stop at only 2 groups. In short, there are: a) regular public schools, b) public schools that are designated as the only football-playing school for their parish, c) magnet schools, d) the deaf school, e) lab schools, f) charter schools, and g) private schools.

It's a lot more simple to recognize that the truth of the matter is that each form of school has its own advantages (and disadvantages) over other forms of schools--and that they might as well just keep one playoff system for all schools and concentrate on enforcing LHSAA bylaws rather than dividing everyone.
Posted by Shoulderchoke
Swamps of Lafourche
Member since Aug 2008
7970 posts
Posted on 12/16/13 at 12:39 pm to
I agree that it is a little watered down, but I was happy to see teams like Kinder and Union win. Especially Union who had lost a player earlier this season. Any other year Union gets beat by Curtis by 45.

The only definitive #1 we couldn't determine was 1A. I would have loved to see Haynesville and Vermilion Catholic play. Both teams were very talented this year. It sucks, but that's me being selfish. VC was able to win in memory of their schools priest who passed away.
Posted by Brisket
Over dere
Member since Dec 2009
933 posts
Posted on 12/16/13 at 10:20 pm to
I have a proposal. Go back to the way it was, however when you go to count enrollment, double count any kid who is out of zone for that school (kind of like a multiplier).

If a school gets a high % of kids out of their zone, then the enrollment # for classification purposes will rise and kick them into higher classes automatically. Still give schools the opportunity to play up if they want though, and make the option available for each sport.
Posted by RedPop4
Santiago de Compostela
Member since Jan 2005
15291 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 1:07 am to
Boys-only schools enrollment is counted or determined by DOUBLING the number, as it is. B.M., where my kids go, has about 1,300 students. But according to the LHSAA, that's 2,600.
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
35014 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 6:54 am to
Maybe add a multiplier for hold backs too
Posted by Shoulderchoke
Swamps of Lafourche
Member since Aug 2008
7970 posts
Posted on 12/17/13 at 8:17 am to
Can't, West Monroe would be 10A
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram