- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:09 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
5 objections and Nobes asked to change his vote.
Let's deal with this right now.
im about to pull the co-commish card and say frick that. he voted, thats it
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:09 pm to cwill
quote:
Relevance?
It was a shitty analogy someone made, like referencing a 1930s baseball trade to a 2008 fantasy basketball trade.
A rmc, being related has nothing to do with recognizing shitty trades. I'd veto lester's trade is it was bad. i want to win, i dont care who im playing against. way to bring that into it, sport.
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:09 pm to rmc
quote:
I do notice that with 1/6 of the league being related they can bring down a trade with ease. Just FYI.
well if this trade goes through, then there could be no such thing as collusion between me and my brother.
That's a great precedent to set
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:09 pm to cwill
this trade is already vetoed. I hope RMC doesn't try to pull a Nobes can't change his vote thing because he disagrees.
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:10 pm to cwill
quote:
Who's related?
les and gyno are brothers
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:11 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
well if this trade goes through, then there could be no such thing as collusion between me and my brother.
That's a great precedent to set
this trade would get vetoed in 95% of leagues in america.
i want a ruling on it toute suite.
we have 6 votes .
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:12 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
well if this trade goes through, then there could be no such thing as collusion between me and my brother.
That's a great precedent to set
no. if you are calling me a cheater, you need to either stop beating around the bush and lay your claim or shut the frick up with talk like that
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:12 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
this trade would get vetoed in 95% of leagues in america.
ive played fantasy sports for like 12 years and this is easily the shittiest trade I've ever seen. Even for a keeper league.
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:13 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
ive played fantasy sports for like 12 years and this is easily the shittiest trade I've ever seen. Even for a keeper league.
no
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:14 pm to Ron Mexico
doesnt the majority of people who think this trade sucks tell you something?
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:15 pm to Ron Mexico
theres your six votes figs
you still have to go through rmcc, and he has the final say, and he is ok with it.
you still have to go through rmcc, and he has the final say, and he is ok with it.
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:16 pm to LSU Fan 90812
I would like to point out that last year in week 10 I was in 9th place FWIW.
RESPEK
RESPEK
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:16 pm to Ron Mexico
quote:
no. if you are calling me a cheater, you need to either stop beating around the bush and lay your claim or shut the frick up with talk like that
Im not calling you a cheater. Learn to comprehend. If I wanted to call you a cheater, I would fricking say it.
Im saying if this shitty trade doesn't constitute a veto, than there would NEVER EVER EVER be a situation where 2 teams would collude.
Because all anyone could say was "hey, he is tanking it and playing for next year."
We might as well do away with the voting because this is the worst deal I've ever seen.
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:17 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
doesnt the majority of people who think this trade sucks tell you something?
i dont really give a shite, bc people arent looking at the fact that both teams got better
i gave up two picks for next year, and that seems to be going by the wayside. maybe if yall would take a step back and look it might not seem that bad. but that is too logical i guess
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:17 pm to NOBODY
mainly because of shitty but not unfair trade.
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:18 pm to LSU Fan 90812
quote:
mainly because of shitty but not unfair trade.
Bogut, LEe, and Azbuike for Big Al?
Naw.
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:19 pm to Ron Mexico
quote:
i gave up two picks for next year, and that seems to be going by the wayside. maybe if yall would take a step back and look it might not seem that bad. but that is too logical i guess
AND YOU TRADED AWAY 4 fricking players off the WAIVER WIRE
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:19 pm to Ron Mexico
quote:
i gave up two picks for next year, and that seems to be going by the wayside. maybe if yall would take a step back and look it might not seem that bad. but that is too logical i guess
sorry ron. you knew you were fleecing him.
i think you should be able to put together a trade using the same parts.
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:19 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
Because all anyone could say was "hey, he is tanking it and playing for next year."
fine, say that, but that is the case here
im giving up the best player in the deal, and two picks, and im getting two guys back who wouldnt play today if they had a game.
Page 9 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News