- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/31/08 at 1:46 pm to Ron Mexico
geez everyone is so tense
Posted on 12/31/08 at 1:48 pm to Ron Mexico
quote:
theres a reason you want to unload that guy
why is that?
because im trying to contend, and he is on the verge of being a 20/8 next year?
that trade actually makes sense.
and i dont care that he didnt do it. Just dont say that you are and back out. Something ill keep in the back of my mind
Posted on 12/31/08 at 1:48 pm to rmcc316
quote:
not me. its part of being in a keeper league, imo.
If Gyno and I make that trade, do you veto?
Posted on 12/31/08 at 1:50 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
If Gyno and I make that trade, do you veto?
good question
Posted on 12/31/08 at 1:51 pm to Lester Earl
ron would be the 1st to veto a deal like this.
Posted on 12/31/08 at 1:53 pm to PortCityTiger24
quote:
ron would be the 1st to veto a deal like this.
ive vetoed one trade in my life, and it wasnt even serious
i didnt even veto jackson for boozer, when everyone else fricking bitched about it
Posted on 12/31/08 at 1:53 pm to PortCityTiger24
The trade should be vetoed, because though these guys did not collude, it is so lopsided that it appears that they did. In otherwords if you didn't know these guys and I showed you the trade you'd think they were cheating.
Posted on 12/31/08 at 1:55 pm to cwill
hahahahahaha
its like the DRAFT PICKS arent even there
5 objections, youguys are figs
its like the DRAFT PICKS arent even there
5 objections, youguys are figs
Posted on 12/31/08 at 1:56 pm to cwill
Veto? WTF?!?!?!? No one VETOED when BABE RUTH was traded for nothing from the RED SOX!!!!!!!!!!
UGHHHH!!!!!!
UGHHHH!!!!!!
Posted on 12/31/08 at 1:57 pm to cwill
quote:
The trade should be vetoed, because though these guys did not collude, it is so lopsided that it appears that they did. In otherwords if you didn't know these guys and I showed you the trade you'd think they were cheating.
that's actually a good point.
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:00 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
If Gyno and I make that trade, do you veto?
anyone?
Ron?
RICK?
rmcc?
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:03 pm to Lester Earl
no, i dont veto trades
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:04 pm to Ron Mexico
ahh you guys are so full of shite
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:04 pm to Lester Earl
why even ask the question then if that was your predetermined response
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:05 pm to rmc
you aren't even that far behind... i dont understand why people tank, it's not even the break yet. if you concentrated on working good deals, you could get better quick. didnt nobes come from behind to win it all last year? it's shite like this that makes leagues unfun for everyone
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:06 pm to Ron Mexico
quote:
5 objections, youguys are figs
5 objections and Nobes asked to change his vote.
Let's deal with this right now.
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:06 pm to Ron Mexico
i just wanted to see if you would be truthful.
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:07 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
Veto? WTF?!?!?!? No one VETOED when BABE RUTH was traded for nothing from the RED SOX!!!!!!!!!!
Relevance?
Posted on 12/31/08 at 2:08 pm to cwill
quote:
Relevance?
cwill, you might have the worst sarcasm detector i ahve ever seen
Page 8 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News