Started By
Message

re: Sources: The College Football Playoff is nearing a deal to expand to 24 teams in 2027

Posted on 10/16/26 at 4:59 am to
Posted by Drewbie
tFlagship
Member since Jun 2012
67795 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 4:59 am to
quote:

8 is unnecessary.
Not sure I agree. We've already had a 7 seed vs. 8 seed matchup in the title game in the 12 team format and Miami was a 10 seed in the title game last year. Beyond the current 12 is absolutely retarded, though. None of the new inclusions will ever have a real shot at winning anything.
This post was edited on 10/16/26 at 5:02 am
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
15217 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 5:47 am to
Going forward all you need to do in the SEC is go 5-4 in conference to get in. Tough OOC games will go away. When there are 24 teams at least 8 will be from the SEC because that would leave 16 slots left and where are they going to come from? I don't even like the SEC but that will happen.

Forget taking off the last game, some teams will be able to coast for all of November if they want to.

I do want to watch the selection show where half of it is arguing about the 9th or 10th SEC team vs the 5th Big 12 team,

riveting
This post was edited on 10/16/26 at 5:48 am
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
26938 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 9:35 am to
quote:

This expansion eliminates the crying about final seeds,
No it doesn’t. It just changes the crying from being about the ranking order of teams 10-15 to being about the 22-28 teams instead. If anything it may make the crying worse because there’s going to be a lot more teams with very comparable resumes arguing they deserve one of the last seeds. 12 team playoff will almost always be filled with 10-2 teams or better. Occasionally there may be a 9-3 team, but it’ll be a team who has played a gauntlet of a schedule and has quality wins. Last spots in a 24 team field is going to be a debate among 10 teams who are 9-3 with easier schedules and no big time wins. And probably 8-4 teams a lot of years

quote:

gives the Big Ten and SEC huge pools of teams in it,
Yes, because finishing 7th in the conference because you lost your 3 or 4 toughest games deserves a playoff spot
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
26938 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 9:48 am to
quote:

won’t be for my enjoyment because I won’t be watching a majority of those pointless games


Pretty much where I'll be on the college regular season next year. I'll still watch LSU games but that's probably about it. I already only really watch NFL on the Sunday and Monday night games, mostly because I'm not doing anything else on a Sunday / Monday night. Compared to college regular season where I'll spend most of the day watching games, even the games where I have no particular rooting interest for either team. Every week is high stakes games for college. The weekly stakes are already far less with a 12 team playoff and are almost non-existent with 24 teams. What's the point in hate-watching Alabama regular season games when they can lose 4 of them and still make the playoffs? At that point, its just NFL light but with more roster turnover every offseason.
Posted by 1BamaRTR
In Your Head Blvd
Member since Apr 2015
25134 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 9:51 am to
quote:

These tears will make me sleep good tonight. A bunch of whiney posters crying about a true playoff.

I’m convinced you’re just a troll at this point. Your old shtick was how all these changes help the “little guys” in the CFB. Now you’ll be seeing plenty of 4 loss SEC and Big 10 teams making it in

quote:

I can’t wait until the next generation
Many in the next generation already don’t care as much about football
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
26938 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 10:02 am to
quote:

I assure you the guys that ruin their brains and bodies for your enjoyment would rather win a playoff game and get a shot to play a top 8 team in the playoffs than go to Orlando for a week in December.



Wait until you have a projected top 5-10 pick in the NFL draft playing for a 24 seed and blows out their knee in a lopsided loss in a playoff game that they were 20+ point underdogs in anyway. Watch how fast star players on those 20-24 seed teams start talking about skipping the playoffs. They know their team has zero shot of winning 5 straight games against top 10 teams. So the expanded playoff is just expanded opportunity for them to get injured and hurt their draft stock.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
56063 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 10:04 am to
quote:

how all these changes help the “little guys” in the CFB.


No change will ever help the little guys in CFB… because they’re little
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
26938 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 10:08 am to
quote:

We've already had a 7 seed vs. 8 seed matchup in the title game


They were really the 5 and 6 in the actual CFP rankings, but were bumped down to the 7 and 8 seeds because the top 4 spots were reserved for conference champs

But 8 would be the ideal playoff. 5 conference champs and 3 at-large. SEC and B1G would still get a 2nd team in most years for an at-large spot. Doesn't completely kill the bowls. Keeps the regular season stakes high. And its a true playoff.
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
18067 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 10:13 am to
Some more thoughts I've had. This effectively kills the bowl games. But then again, those were effectively already killed. The only benefit I see from this whole thing is I believe this move will eliminate a lot of the opt-outs. Even for the teams who will have virtually zero chance of winning it all, I'd bet those players would still elect to continue playing for the post-season.

Posted by GeauxPanthers2
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Member since Dec 2024
3624 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 10:46 am to
The biggest problem with the 24-team playoff is the neutral site games in the quarterfinals. The regular season is even more meaningless if going 11-1 or winning your hard conference doesn't even get you the advantage of playing at home.

The bowl system and an expanded playoff are not compatible. Whole thing sucks.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
26938 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 10:59 am to
quote:

The only benefit I see from this whole thing is I believe this move will eliminate a lot of the opt-outs. Even for the teams who will have virtually zero chance of winning it all, I'd bet those players would still elect to continue playing for the post-season.
Maybe. But maybe not. They’d have to win 5 playoff games and a 24 seed is likely to be 3+ underdogs every round. I bet you still see a few opt outs from those teams because nobody thinks a team that could barely make a 24 team field is going to pull of 5 straight wins against top 10 teams, especially having to win 2 road games before you even reach the neutral site rounds.
Posted by UnwipedBBL
Batin Rewage
Member since Oct 2026
230 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 11:06 am to
they need to make SOS the top ranking factor. Since you can lose more games and still get in, incentivize teams to schedule them. This shite is supposed to be entertainment.
Posted by Tiger Prawn
Member since Dec 2016
26938 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 11:11 am to
But is it really any better when you can have a tough schedule with 5 really quality opponents and lose 4 of those games, but still make the playoff because you went 7-0 against your conference's JV teams and a couple of G5 or FCS non-conference games? There's no stakes in the big games against a top 10 opponent because you can lose all of those games and still make the CFP
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
62106 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 11:29 am to
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
62106 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 11:43 am to
Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
53861 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

. 5 conference champs


Only 4 conferences and some years the ACC and Big 12 champ wouldn’t deserve it.
Posted by RollTide1987
Baltimore, MD
Member since Nov 2009
72433 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

and some years the ACC and Big 12 champ wouldn’t deserve it.


Like last year.

In the proposed format, an 8-5 Duke squad would have gotten in over a 12-1 James Madison (not that they would have had a chance anyway).
Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
53861 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 3:17 pm to
So in this 24 team playoff are the top 4 teams getting a double bye? What’s the proposed format?
Posted by RunningJacket
Member since Dec 2008
1221 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 4:59 pm to
I love this stuff. Somebody actually said they’ll stop watching - and was an LSU fan. Yet, you guys acted like a game in September was the biggest game of the decade. The rest of the country was and is laughing. And last week we had 70,000plus pile into a stadium to watch a meaningless game.

You guys may not like a playoff but the country will absolutely watch in huge numbers. And you’ll still watch Bama-LSU type regular season games because they are fun to watch. Just because a loss in September or October doesn’t end your season doesn’t make the regular season worthless. If that ps the case 90% of fanbases wouldn’t exist.

I’m going to the GT-VT game tomorrow and it’s sold out. And these are 2 mid tier teams with no hopes at any playoff spot yet their fans will enjoy every minute of a fun 4 hour fall afternoon. That’s the real college football not the garbage you guys believe.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
62106 posts
Posted on 10/16/26 at 5:19 pm to
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram