- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SEC and ACC expansion
Posted on 6/8/10 at 11:15 am to molsusports
Posted on 6/8/10 at 11:15 am to molsusports
quote:
ISU can expect Ramen for a long time I'd think
Nom...Nom....Nom....Oodles of Noodles
Posted on 6/8/10 at 11:16 am to molsusports
SEC needs to try and pry TAMU out of the Big-12, asap. After that, add Miami and be done with it.
Posted on 6/8/10 at 11:19 am to Solo
Miami has nothing in common with the SEC members. Add Rutgers to the Big 10
Posted on 6/8/10 at 11:23 am to Palm Beach Tiger
quote:
Adding a team like Miami would increase revenue
for the SEC?
quote:
All of their games would be televised.
our television deal is already set
Posted on 6/8/10 at 11:35 am to SlowFlowPro
SEC doesn't need expansion. We get enough national exposure as is without adding an additional 4 teams to split up our current profit. It would be cool from a fan's perspective, but I want LSU to bring in as much money as possible
Posted on 6/8/10 at 11:38 am to SlowFlowPro
Renegotiate with ESPN.
Conf shake-ups are coming. I'm sure the SEC powers that be will get ahead of the 8-ball.
Conf shake-ups are coming. I'm sure the SEC powers that be will get ahead of the 8-ball.
Posted on 6/8/10 at 11:40 am to Solo
quote:
Renegotiate with ESPN.
why would they renegotiate? they signed a FIFTEEN year deal with the SEC
the more the SEC adds, the better the deal ESPN gets
what is the SEC going to do, tell ESPN to frick off and get left in the cold? no
the SEC has no leverage
Posted on 6/8/10 at 11:52 am to SlowFlowPro
Slo, you are acting as if renegotiation is a dirty word. The value of the contract would not change by much, and ultimately ESPN/SEC want to be in business with each other. The SEC would get some more jack and ESPN would be in the Texas/So. Florida markets. It's a win-win. We aren't talking about gobs of money here, this is peanuts.
Posted on 6/8/10 at 12:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
VT adds the Beltway TV market which is huge. They'd probably be 1st choice of SEC and I rarely ever see them mentioned.
Posted on 6/8/10 at 12:05 pm to Solo
quote:
you are acting as if renegotiation is a dirty word.
it's not
ESPN just has all the leverage
quote:
and ultimately ESPN/SEC want to be in business with each other.
if the pac16 happens, ESPN may want to be in business with the pac16
Posted on 6/8/10 at 12:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
15 years isn't infinity dude. And obviously there would be playoffs that increase the revenue sharing pot by over a billion a year.
If SEC16 has 5 schools in the new NCAA 16 team playoffs that's like $275 million shared by all SEC schools (on top of regular season TV deals).
So yeah you want more good teams regardless of current deal (which would be redone anyway).
If SEC16 has 5 schools in the new NCAA 16 team playoffs that's like $275 million shared by all SEC schools (on top of regular season TV deals).
So yeah you want more good teams regardless of current deal (which would be redone anyway).
This post was edited on 6/8/10 at 12:11 pm
Posted on 6/8/10 at 12:11 pm to AlejandroInHouston
quote:
And obviously there would be playoffs that increase the revenue sharing pot by over a billion a year.
a. that revenue # is too high
b. i don't think playoffs will occur anytime soon b/c there will not be a way to divide the money up well
c. 4 teams in a playoff will make the #s even harder
quote:
If SEC16 has 5 schools in the new NCAA 16 team playoffs that's like $275 million shared by all SEC schools
see: (b) and (c) from above
This post was edited on 6/8/10 at 12:12 pm
Posted on 6/8/10 at 12:13 pm to AlejandroInHouston
For everybody talking about Duke and UNC making us a bball conference - forget it. There's NO money in bball.
If SEC expands it will go after football schools like FSU, VT, Clemson. Programs that could be perennial contendersfor the playoffs and an extra cut of that huge billion dollar pie.
If SEC expands it will go after football schools like FSU, VT, Clemson. Programs that could be perennial contendersfor the playoffs and an extra cut of that huge billion dollar pie.
Posted on 6/8/10 at 12:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
Playoffs are inevitible SFP. And a billion is not too high at all.
Posted on 6/8/10 at 12:16 pm to AlejandroInHouston
quote:
Playoffs are inevitible SFP.
i wouldn't say that
quote:
And a billion is not too high at all.
i think the NFL's REGULAR SEASON deals, other than MNF and SNF, is a little over a bil/year
tell me how the conferences would agree to split up the playoff money, and how much of a cut teh NCAA would demand first
Posted on 6/8/10 at 12:27 pm to Pilot Tiger
quote:
I'd love to add Ga Tech back and then maybe UNC, Duke, Miami
radio in Los Angeles said they hear the SEC would go after Clemson, GT, FSU, and Miami IF they expand.
But, said they may not expand depending on how the TV money looks like it will be allocated.
Posted on 6/8/10 at 12:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
SEC wont and doesnt need to change shite
Posted on 6/8/10 at 12:36 pm to redneck
The SEC would be foolish if they don't take a run at Texas, OU or TAMU.
Posted on 6/8/10 at 12:46 pm to Solo
quote:
The SEC would be foolish if they don't take a run at Texas, OU or TAMU.
problem is it to get Texas and A&M you prob have to take Baylor and TTech.
Who is better? those 4 or GT, Clemson, FSU, and Miami.
i like the Texas TV markets, but getting a stranglehold on the ATL and all of Florida is not bad either.
eta: plus, all 4 of the ACC schools already have natural rivals in the SEC.
This post was edited on 6/8/10 at 12:47 pm
Popular
Back to top


0




