- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Scary Terry McLaurin requests trade from Commies
Posted on 8/1/25 at 7:05 am to Ostrich
Posted on 8/1/25 at 7:05 am to Ostrich
quote:
Washington has him locked up for the next three seasons if that want him. He has zero leverage
Looking at Sportrac, he's a UFA next year? So this is basically a Hendrickson situation?
0
Posted on 8/1/25 at 7:21 am to UnluckyTiger
Washington’s going to have an explosive offense with one of the best young QBs in the NFL and an offensive mind calling plays.
Pittsburgh is going to be……Pittsburgh lol. With a dinosaur as a QB.
Pittsburgh is going to be……Pittsburgh lol. With a dinosaur as a QB.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 7:31 am to TackySweater
I’m great with Terry getting 2/30 or 3/90, maaaybe match DK’s terms for 2 to 3 years but anything above him is high. He isn’t better than Lamb. Sure as hell isn’t close to Chase or Jefferson.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 7:34 am to UnluckyTiger
quote:
I’m great with Terry getting 2/30 or 3/90, maaaybe match DK’s terms for 2 to 3 years but anything above him is high. He isn’t better than Lamb. Sure as hell isn’t close to Chase or Jefferson.
This all stems from DK being way overpaid anyway.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 7:35 am to UnluckyTiger
quote:
I’m great with Terry getting 2/30 or 3/90, maaaybe match DK’s terms for 2 to 3 years but anything above him is high. He isn’t better than Lamb. Sure as hell isn’t close to Chase or Jefferson.
But we all know that isn't how the NFL works. If you are top 10ish at your position you will be paid like the overall #1 guy until that guy's contract is up for renegotiation
Top 5 paid players are Dak, Allen, Burrow, Love and Lawrence. I think you could make a damn good argument only 2 of them are top 5 QBs
Posted on 8/1/25 at 7:41 am to The Pirate King
quote:
No, you want to put yourself in a position where you are paid what you think you're worth, not what the market says you're worth.
Well, he’s not worth what Jamarr, JJ, or CeeDee are worth. To be honest, I’m not sure if he is necessarily worth what DK is worth.
These people and their agents are clowns.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 7:43 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
quote:
He’s a good player but giving Top 5 money to a receiver that has never broken 1200 yards is not going to be a move championship teams make
He’s played his whole career with the likes of Sam Howell, Taylor Heineke, and the ghost of Alex Smith
And? Malik Nabers got 1200 yards last year playing with Da bell Jones, Tim Boyle, and Tommy Cutlets
Posted on 8/1/25 at 8:57 am to Tiger in NY
quote:great point
And? Malik Nabers got 1200 yards last year playing with Da bell Jones, Tim Boyle, and Tommy Cutlets
And Terry would have a lot more leverage if he wasn’t nearing old as dirt territory in NFL terms. If Terry were 27 like DK, he would’ve been inked already.
This post was edited on 8/1/25 at 8:58 am
Posted on 8/1/25 at 9:18 am to Buckeye06
quote:This list is insane to me. Burrow and Allen I get, but the others? Sheesh.
Dak, Allen, Burrow, Love and Lawrence
Posted on 8/1/25 at 9:19 am to grizzlylongcut
quote:
Well, he’s not worth what Jamarr, JJ, or CeeDee are worth. To be honest, I’m not sure if he is necessarily worth what DK is worth. These people and their agents are clowns.
Exactly. Sounds like he wants top WR money. Washington would be stupid to pay him that. He's definitely a really good player, but JD made most of those plays for him by making some insane throws in tight windows last year.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 9:52 am to The Pirate King
quote:
Sounds like he wants top WR money. Washington would be stupid to pay him that
That’s how the league works. All they need to do is front load the deal while Daniels in on a rookie deal.
quote:
but JD made most of those plays for him by making some insane throws in tight windows last year.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 10:03 am to red sox fan 13
On the one hand, my immediate thought is to not pay him that kind of money as he isn't in the same tier as the others.
On the other hand, the Commanders find themselves in the highly coveted position of having your franchise QB on a rookie contract. The window to win is now before you have to pay JD5.
On the other hand, the Commanders find themselves in the highly coveted position of having your franchise QB on a rookie contract. The window to win is now before you have to pay JD5.
This post was edited on 8/1/25 at 10:04 am
Posted on 8/1/25 at 6:31 pm to Veritas
quote:If the owners would get together and grow a pair the league would be better off. Players want to sit out, let them sit out and not get paid. You don’t play you lose that year and the contract is still the same. Players are employees on a contract and I guarantee the owners stand firm those players would get in line.
It’s not 1980
Posted on 8/1/25 at 6:32 pm to UnluckyTiger
Trade him to the Pats.
Page 3 of 3
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News