Started By
Message

re: Salt Lake City MLB

Posted on 5/29/26 at 6:50 am to
Posted by TDawg1313
WA
Member since Jul 2009
12468 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 6:50 am to
quote:

Metro Area (MSA): ~1.3 million residents (comprising Salt Lake and Tooele Counties).

Why would you include Tooele County which is basically a small town and a vast desert?

Salt Lake, Davis, and Utah Counties are where people would come from for the games and that's about a 2.4 million. A team there would be in the same metro population bucket as Pittsburgh, St Louis, and Baltimore. But it is one of the fastest growing areas in the country. It would be a better market than Milwaukee, Kansas City, and Cleveland.
Posted by LSUTIGER in TEXAS
Member since Jan 2008
13690 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 7:13 am to
I think one of the biggest problems SLC has is altitude. They are approx 4300 feet above sea level. Baseball in Colorado has been weak, in part bc the elevation hurts the pitching staff and manipulates the field dimensions. 8 winning seasons since 93 and ZERO division titles.


Best case scenario you get a Tampa rays type organization that wins with less. they’ll never be a free agent destination and always on the prospect dread list.

I just don’t think baseball is better with Utah. Leave them as a minor league destination— adding Utah just dilutes the product.
Posted by nola tiger lsu
Member since Nov 2007
7400 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 7:28 am to
quote:

they’ll never be a free agent destination


I would disagree. It's a beautiful place and low tax environment. A star could have a place in Park City and be at the park in 30 mins.
Posted by IamNotaRobot
OKC
Member since Nov 2021
1879 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 7:39 am to
Baseball markets are different. Biggest reason why the A’s left Oakland. MLB wants to expand its footprint not oversaturate its existing markets. Hence why Nashville and SLC are the leading candidates for expansions.
Posted by Turftoe
Denver
Member since Mar 2016
4394 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 8:04 am to
quote:

I think one of the biggest problems SLC has is altitude. They are approx 4300 feet above sea level. Baseball in Colorado has been weak, in part bc the elevation hurts the pitching staff and manipulates the field dimensions. 8 winning seasons since 93 and ZERO division titles.


The Rockies suck because of shite ownership
Posted by ShaneTheLegLechler
Member since Dec 2011
63428 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 8:17 am to
Yes, the Rockies support and attendance is actually incredible considering how poorly run they’ve been. If anything they prove the opposite
Posted by RolltidePA
North Carolina
Member since Dec 2010
5655 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 8:43 am to
quote:


Nashville is already a shoe-in. The second team will probably be SLC. They will just be easier to deal with business wise than Montreal. Portland maybe but do we really want/need another West coast team? Austin and OKC are already in large MLB markets so they’re out. Charlotte makes sense but not going to expand two teams in the east.


I wouldn't be so sure about Nashville. Raleigh may end up being the spot in the east. They already have an owner and money in place. The owner of the Hurricanes and Trailblazers has committed. They have land and location for a stadium and local and state politicians are supporting it as well.

There are a couple other surprising things that can sway it to Raleigh as well. Raleigh is the nations largest TV market without an MLB team in its footprint. The TV market is larger than Nashville, Raleigh is 22nd and Nashville is 26th (Charlotte is 21st). The MLB uses a 60 mile radius for population. Raleigh has 2.4 million people in that radius and Nashville has 2.1. Raleigh has a faster growth rate as well. 1.68% vs. 1.19%. Raleigh would come into the league with a market bigger than 10 cities with teams. Maybe most importantly for owners is that Raleigh currently sits outside of any of the current TV market area. They would have to carve out of the Braves TV market to accommodate a team in Charlotte and Nashville would have to carve out of both the Braves and Cardinals markets.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
54894 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 9:33 am to
quote:

Biggest reason why the A’s left Oakland.
they left Oakland because they were never gonna get a new stadium there
Posted by IamNotaRobot
OKC
Member since Nov 2021
1879 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 10:52 am to
That was certainly a factor but playing in the shadow of the Giants market always hindered their bottom line. They would’ve moved to San Jose but MLB blocked it. When Vegas became a thing it was a no-brainer.
Posted by IamNotaRobot
OKC
Member since Nov 2021
1879 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 10:58 am to
Ya that’s a good point. Nashville seems like the bigger draw from a marketing standpoint but both would be solid options.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
81070 posts
Posted on 5/29/26 at 11:34 am to
quote:

It will be interesting whether the MLB moves to 4 8-team divisions or 8 4-team divisons.


4 divisions of 8 teams would be better so Manfred will definitely do 8 divisions of 4 teams.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram