- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:15 pm to JJ27
I think that was indicative of the Saints lack of receiver talent vs Seattle's by far best secondary in the L. He's not going to suddenly light it up in Seattle
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:15 pm to TulaneTigerFan
quote:
I don't think the Saints have much talent at all on offense outside of Brees and Graham.
LOL
Who exactly are those 49 offensive studs?
Good lord they couldn't get 200 yards against the Saints, a game the Saints dominated for the most part.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:15 pm to JJ27
I think he throws for less than 200. He took care of the ball though as far as INTs. If he turns the ball over, it could get bad.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:16 pm to TDawg1313
Seahawks open up as a 7.5 point favorite at some offshore books.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:16 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
don't care right now.
honestly.
just tired of hearing all the media blowhards talk about how the Saints won't win on the road.
and how we don't have a running game.
same thing on this board. A bunch of media driven opinions. It is really sad actually.
honestly.
just tired of hearing all the media blowhards talk about how the Saints won't win on the road.
and how we don't have a running game.
same thing on this board. A bunch of media driven opinions. It is really sad actually.
This post was edited on 1/4/14 at 11:17 pm
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:20 pm to TulaneTigerFan
quote:
Seahawks by double digits
eta: This was my preferred scenario for my beloved Hawks
The smart money is on the Seahawks in this one, but saying that you'd prefer to play the 11-5 Saints rather than the 8-7-1 Packers is stupid and comes off as trolling, tbh.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:21 pm to Brettesaurus Rex
At some point or another TTF has been a fan of about 10 teams b/w NFL and NBA.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:22 pm to benhamin5555
The Packers lost 5 of those games while Rodgers was out. They have the talent on offense to threaten Seattle's D. Much more explosive receivers and an actual play maker at RB
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:24 pm to benhamin5555
Smart money will be on the Saints. Seahawks are the obvious choice here, with their record, Saints road record, results of last game. Seahawks obvious public choice.
The Saints also played a tougher schedule than Seattle. They'll be ready.
The Saints also played a tougher schedule than Seattle. They'll be ready.
This post was edited on 1/4/14 at 11:28 pm
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:24 pm to Overbrook
quote:
Smart money will be on the Saints.
wut
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:25 pm to benhamin5555
quote:
but saying that you'd prefer to play the 11-5 Saints rather than the 8-7-1 Packers is stupid and comes off as trolling, tbh.
I'd disagree with that. The Packers are 6-2 with Rodgers. They are kind of an unknown. I could see them making a run. I would rather play the Saints since we already saw that match up and it was our most lopsided game this year outside of maybe Jacksonville.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:25 pm to tigerpimpbot
Saints got this.
Nobody fist pumps anymore, we shuffle
quote:
#fist pumping
Nobody fist pumps anymore, we shuffle
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:25 pm to JS87
If the Saints win @ Seattle, they will win the shite outdoor New York Super Bowl.
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:32 pm to TulaneTigerFan
What if I told you that teams ran on Seattle 422 times for 1,626 yards for an average of 3.9 yards per carry?
What if I also told you that teams ran on Philly 443 times for 1,668 yards for an average of 3.8 yards per carry?
What if I also told you that teams ran on Philly 443 times for 1,668 yards for an average of 3.8 yards per carry?
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:34 pm to Sophandros
quote:wtf you auditioning for 30 For 30?
What if I told you
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:36 pm to Sophandros
quote:
What if I told you that teams ran on Seattle 422 times for 1,626 yards for an average of 3.9 yards per carry?
What if I also told you that teams ran on Philly 443 times for 1,668 yards for an average of 3.8 yards per carry?
That sounds like a 30 for 30
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:36 pm to bamafan425
I wonder if there has ever been an example in or around 2010 of one team blowing out another team in the regular season only to lose to that team in the playoffs...
Popular
Back to top


2







