Started By
Message

re: Saints vs. Seahawks

Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:14 pm to
Posted by JJ27
Member since Sep 2004
61883 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:14 pm to
You think he throws for 147 again?
Posted by TTsTowel
RIP Bow9den/Coastie
Member since Feb 2010
92639 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:15 pm to
Pure domination.
Posted by TulaneTigerFan
Seattle
Member since Sep 2005
35856 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:15 pm to
I think that was indicative of the Saints lack of receiver talent vs Seattle's by far best secondary in the L. He's not going to suddenly light it up in Seattle
Posted by Overbrook
Member since May 2013
6369 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:15 pm to
quote:

I don't think the Saints have much talent at all on offense outside of Brees and Graham.

LOL
Who exactly are those 49 offensive studs?
Good lord they couldn't get 200 yards against the Saints, a game the Saints dominated for the most part.
Posted by TDawg1313
WA
Member since Jul 2009
12440 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:15 pm to
I think he throws for less than 200. He took care of the ball though as far as INTs. If he turns the ball over, it could get bad.
Posted by bamafan425
Jackson's Hole
Member since Jan 2009
25638 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:16 pm to
Seahawks open up as a 7.5 point favorite at some offshore books.
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile, AL.
Member since May 2008
35399 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:16 pm to
don't care right now.

honestly.

just tired of hearing all the media blowhards talk about how the Saints won't win on the road.

and how we don't have a running game.

same thing on this board. A bunch of media driven opinions. It is really sad actually.
This post was edited on 1/4/14 at 11:17 pm
Posted by benhamin5555
Member since Oct 2009
2368 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:20 pm to
quote:

Seahawks by double digits

eta: This was my preferred scenario for my beloved Hawks


The smart money is on the Seahawks in this one, but saying that you'd prefer to play the 11-5 Saints rather than the 8-7-1 Packers is stupid and comes off as trolling, tbh.
Posted by D011ahbi11
Member since Jun 2007
13679 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:21 pm to
At some point or another TTF has been a fan of about 10 teams b/w NFL and NBA.
Posted by TulaneTigerFan
Seattle
Member since Sep 2005
35856 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:22 pm to
The Packers lost 5 of those games while Rodgers was out. They have the talent on offense to threaten Seattle's D. Much more explosive receivers and an actual play maker at RB
Posted by Forkbeard3777
Chicago
Member since Apr 2013
3841 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:24 pm to
Seattle - 31
New Orleans - 20
Posted by Overbrook
Member since May 2013
6369 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:24 pm to
Smart money will be on the Saints. Seahawks are the obvious choice here, with their record, Saints road record, results of last game. Seahawks obvious public choice.

The Saints also played a tougher schedule than Seattle. They'll be ready.
This post was edited on 1/4/14 at 11:28 pm
Posted by LSU Piston
The 313
Member since Feb 2008
3844 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:24 pm to
quote:

Smart money will be on the Saints.


wut
Posted by TDawg1313
WA
Member since Jul 2009
12440 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:25 pm to
quote:

but saying that you'd prefer to play the 11-5 Saints rather than the 8-7-1 Packers is stupid and comes off as trolling, tbh.

I'd disagree with that. The Packers are 6-2 with Rodgers. They are kind of an unknown. I could see them making a run. I would rather play the Saints since we already saw that match up and it was our most lopsided game this year outside of maybe Jacksonville.
Posted by SaintCajun
Pacific Northwest
Member since Apr 2012
4294 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:25 pm to
Saints got this.

quote:

#fist pumping


Nobody fist pumps anymore, we shuffle
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
68762 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:25 pm to
If the Saints win @ Seattle, they will win the shite outdoor New York Super Bowl.
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45219 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:32 pm to
What if I told you that teams ran on Seattle 422 times for 1,626 yards for an average of 3.9 yards per carry?

What if I also told you that teams ran on Philly 443 times for 1,668 yards for an average of 3.8 yards per carry?
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
153956 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:34 pm to
quote:

What if I told you
wtf you auditioning for 30 For 30?
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
68762 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:36 pm to
quote:

What if I told you that teams ran on Seattle 422 times for 1,626 yards for an average of 3.9 yards per carry?

What if I also told you that teams ran on Philly 443 times for 1,668 yards for an average of 3.8 yards per carry?


That sounds like a 30 for 30
Posted by Sophandros
Victoria Concordia Crescit
Member since Feb 2005
45219 posts
Posted on 1/4/14 at 11:36 pm to
I wonder if there has ever been an example in or around 2010 of one team blowing out another team in the regular season only to lose to that team in the playoffs...

Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram