Started By
Message

re: RG 3 being called "smart"

Posted on 2/29/12 at 7:20 am to
Posted by Jumbeauxlaya
LSU
Member since Jan 2011
18083 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 7:20 am to
quote:

and know way more than I do, though.



Yep, and not because I was unmotivated to "look them up"
Posted by TGHub
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2008
2262 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 9:11 am to
quote:

You can't tell someone intellect by their speech.
It's a pretty good indicator. I haven't met too many bright people who don't speak well.
Posted by OBUDan
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
40723 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 9:20 am to
I haven't read through the thread, but this always drives me crazy around this time of year. There are two predominant biases/stereotypes that are almost ALWAYS put forth.

1) The black athlete lacks intelligence
2) The white athlete lacks athleticism

Here are two premium examples of said stereotypes:

1) Cam Newton

Last year, there were A LOT of criticisms thrown about with Cam. Questions about how he would transition to a pro-style offense were completely valid, IMO. A lot of people said he "can't throw," which I thought was plainly untrue just by watching him in college (great arm strength and he had a good feel for the passing game), but he wasn't really asked to shoulder the load as a passer, so some of that is understandable.

But the biggest myth was that he lacked intelligence. Critics further used a 2-minute interview with John Gruden to support the myth. "See he can't he draw up a play!" In a recent interview with George Whitfield, Cam's QB coach leading up to the draft, he commented that a lot of criticisms were thrown out about Cam, and he would often hear them and essentially say, "What? Are they talking about the same guy." He worked with him daily, always seeing his drive, his intelligence... his desire to be great. Yet, all these things were questioned. Whitfield went on to say, the criticisms were coming from guys who never met him, never shook his hand, and would have no idea about any of these things.

Cam's intelligence was routinely questioned. It struck me. Especially considering the year before you had a far bigger project in Tim Tebow, and that was never a criticism for him. He had plenty of other criticisms sure, but I never heard people say, "Well I don't know if he can learn an NFL offense."

2) Luke Kuechly

I spent a decent amount of time reading about him from a variety of mock drafts to Eagles bloggers, because he seemed a natural fit for the Eagles. The critiques were ALWAYS the same: "Highly productive, concerns about athleticism." Over and over and over you'd see it. It was puzzling. The kid shows up at the combine sculpted like a greek god, blazes a couple of 4.5 40s at 250 pounds, tests out well in every measure of explosiveness and completely dispels any myth that he isn't athletic.

To me, both are examples of people simply having stereotypes based on skin colors. The perception is that black athletes aren't intelligent, but "instinctive, natural and athletic" and white athletes aren't athletic but "intelligent, hard working and crafty."

ETA: And to stay on point about Griffin, I didn't need to see him break down a play to know he was intelligent. He graduated from Baylor in 3 years. If he was going to come back to school, they were going to have to find a way for him to juggle being a student athlete that was also in Law School.
This post was edited on 2/29/12 at 9:26 am
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 9:24 am to
quote:

boom or bust imo, stay healthy he's a star. can he take the hits?


You don't say
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 9:30 am to
quote:

What? This statement is dumb. I know plenty of people whom speak well , but are dumbasses. You can't tell someone intellect by their speech.

Amen! Most people are gullible and easily manipulated by someone who is glib and articulate. That's why good con men will always a good living. For the most part, a person's speech is determined by the environment they grew up in. If you take someone with average intelligence who was raised in an upper-middle class environment by two parents who make their living with their mouthes (eg. English professor, trial lawyer, TV news anchor, politician, etc), the/she will likely be articulate without even trying.
Posted by JBeam
Guns,Germs & Steel
Member since Jan 2011
68377 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Amen! Most people are gullible and easily manipulated by someone who is glib and articulate. That's why good con men will always a good living. For the most part, a person's speech is determined by the environment they grew up in. If you take someone with average intelligence who was raised in an upper-middle class environment by two parents who make their living with their mouthes (eg. English professor, trial lawyer, TV news anchor, politician, etc), the/she will likely be articulate without even trying.

are we really going to debate whether or not Griffin is intelligent or not. Seriously people...find something else to talk about.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116206 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 9:53 am to
So the same people complaining at people assuming RGIII is smart because he speaks well, are now assuming RGIII's Baylor degree is a worthless indicator because he is an athlete? Did i gather that right?
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
41221 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 10:24 am to
"sneaky fast" for white athletes = "articulate" for black athletes
Posted by AlexLSU
Member since Jan 2005
25341 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 10:44 am to
He's the same size as Rodgers and bigger than Brees; they seem to be doing fine.
Posted by Helo
Orlando
Member since Nov 2004
4806 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 12:23 pm to
Both Luck and Griffin are pretty bright and seem to be the total package. These 2 are being very scrutinized and neither seem to have any deficiencies. I hate using the term "can't miss" but both seem to have everything it will take including the intangibles.

It is going to be fun watching them in the NFL.
Posted by bama my heart
Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Member since Mar 2007
1293 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Nobody was stupid enough to say "smart for a black guy." Was this a national topic? After him breaking down plays on NFL network with Marriuchi.


I understand you were not saying this, but some people will be quick to assume that these guys were not trying to say that. Why have we gotten to this stage? We're so quick for wanting justice for someone making a remark. We want people fired, like that helps. We need to get a little thicker coat of skin, and not be so sensitive. With that being said, I wonder if this had been about a female sports star, would we have wonder if they meant "she's smart for a woman". Hey it happens.
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
35940 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 12:31 pm to
Baylor isn't exactly a community college is it?
Posted by lenlews
NoMiss
Member since Apr 2011
709 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

I love that people use Vince Young as an example of why the wonderlic is important. He may have scored bad but i would say his dick sucking had more to do with it than his wonderlic.


fify
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
56416 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 1:36 pm to
The liberal media is making Griffin seem more intelligent than he really is because they want to finally see a black QB succeed.
Posted by JBeam
Guns,Germs & Steel
Member since Jan 2011
68377 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

The liberal media is making Griffin seem more intelligent than he really is because they want to finally see a black QB succeed.
Lord I love the mindset of some of the "simple folk" in this region of the country
Posted by steelreign
Deridder
Member since Jan 2009
11086 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Lord I love the mindset of some of the "simple folk" in this region of the country


It is pretty stupid. You can listen to RG3 talk and tell he's educated. He's well spoken and eloquent.
This post was edited on 2/29/12 at 1:53 pm
Posted by JBeam
Guns,Germs & Steel
Member since Jan 2011
68377 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

hat is pretty stupid. You can listen to RG3 talk and tell he's educated. He's well spoken and eloquent.


But no no....its the liberal media that's hyping up RG3's intelligence.....
Posted by chinese58
NELA. after 30 years in Dallas.
Member since Jun 2004
33852 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 2:07 pm to
He's more than "smart for a black guy", he's smart for a football player period.

People being impressed by his intelligence for something he did on TV with Mooch is like people learning Tebow is a Christian because he prayed on the field. You would think the national media would have caught on by these guys last season in college.

quote:

He is intelligent because he is a decent guy and from what I hear raised well


No, he's smart because he was born that way and he used it to educate himself. He got a degree in three years at Baylor. He made the Big XII Commissioner's Honor Roll eight times. He may go to law school still too.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 11:23 pm to
quote:



are we really going to debate whether or not Griffin is intelligent or not. Seriously people...find something else to talk about.

I'm not saying that he's not smart. I'm a big RGIII fan. I just reject the superficial assessment that he's smart because he's glib and articulate.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 2/29/12 at 11:26 pm to
quote:

they want to finally see a black QB succeed.

Finally succeed? Is that you Rush Limbaugh?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram