- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Randy Livngston...When does his appeal get heard and what does everyone think will happen?
Posted on 1/18/24 at 12:33 pm to choupiquesushi
Posted on 1/18/24 at 12:33 pm to choupiquesushi
quote:
They lived in the penthouse condo long enough to be eligible in that district. Once eligible where they lived after that is not relevant
This rule needs to change. If a public school kid moves out of district, they can't stay in the same school.
So why should private school kids who move out of district keep eligibility?
This is one of the few legit complaints the publics have.
2
Posted on 1/18/24 at 2:28 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
If a public school kid moves out of district, they can't stay in the same school.
That’s what I did in Metairie the year I moved to Chalmette… we moved in November but I stayed going to my middle school in Metairie because we had family there
This post was edited on 1/18/24 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 1/18/24 at 2:29 pm to chalmetteowl
Word on the street is all clear and no sanctions.
Posted on 1/18/24 at 4:47 pm to Federal Tiger
quote:
Word on the street is all clear and no sanctions.
Wow.
Money wins. Always.
Posted on 1/18/24 at 4:53 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:m
Wow.
Money wins. Always.
Based on what I heard from the hearing, it had nothing to do with money and everything to do with the LHSAA’s inability to conduct an actual investigation.
Posted on 1/18/24 at 4:54 pm to Antonio Moss
They played the not enough evidence card.
This post was edited on 1/18/24 at 4:56 pm
Posted on 1/18/24 at 5:04 pm to csorre1
So does that mean it’s over or LHSAA just has to conduct more of an investigation?
Posted on 1/18/24 at 5:11 pm to whodat77
I have a meeting with my source in a bit, but I would assume it means Randy is in the clear.
Posted on 1/18/24 at 5:13 pm to csorre1
quote:
They played the not enough evidence card.
We heard two different things
Posted on 1/18/24 at 5:16 pm to Antonio Moss
That's fair. I haven't had a phone conversation yet. Just a couple word text.
Posted on 1/18/24 at 5:17 pm to csorre1
I basically heard that they were so many due process problems with the investigation that the judge just threw everything out and is not going to let the LHSAA bring it to the Executive Committee.
Posted on 1/18/24 at 5:23 pm to Antonio Moss
Makes sense. I'll find out exactly what happened in a couple hours.
Edit: You're right. The Nola.com article says they weren't given due process and they upheld the injunction until a proper hearing can take place. We'll see what my guy says.
Edit: You're right. The Nola.com article says they weren't given due process and they upheld the injunction until a proper hearing can take place. We'll see what my guy says.
This post was edited on 1/18/24 at 5:28 pm
Posted on 1/18/24 at 5:48 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
and everything to do with the LHSAA’s inability to conduct an actual investigation.
But I heard they had a rock solid source with receipts
Didn’t know a judge could interfere in a private organization’s operations like that
This post was edited on 1/18/24 at 5:54 pm
Posted on 1/18/24 at 6:00 pm to chalmetteowl
The article says that the school wasn't informed of the investigation until they were handed punishment. No due process. So now they get a new hearing date.
This post was edited on 1/18/24 at 6:01 pm
Posted on 1/18/24 at 6:59 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
Based on what I heard from the hearing, it had nothing to do with money and everything to do with the LHSAA’s inability to conduct an actual investigation.
Which only happens if you have enough money to take it to court.
Also sounds like a technicality, no?
Posted on 1/18/24 at 7:10 pm to csorre1
quote:
Barial said the LHSAA violated Livingston’s 14th Amendment right to due process when it suspended him without a chance to appeal.
Since when did the 14th amendment apply to a private member-based organization?
quote:
She said the LHSAA, even as a private organization, should be treated as a government agency because it oversees athletics for more than 400 schools, many of them public schools, out of about 440 in Louisiana.
Aaaaaannnnddddd... an Orleans Parish Civil Court judge just ripped off the entire top of Pandora's Box.
This is WILD and if allowed to stand will have far-reaching consequences.
quote:
Newman head of school Dale Smith said the LHSAA did not notify the school it was being investigated for possible violations before suspending Livingston on Dec. 14. LHSAA handbook rule 2.1.3 says the school principal “shall be required to appear before the LHSAA Executive Committee and the Executive Director to answer the allegations against his/her school.”
I always thought the process was a punishment was issued by the Exec Director, and then there is the option for an appeal to the Executive Committee. This seems to be how they have handled punishments in the past.
I don't ever remember a time where there was a hearing before the Exec Committee before a decision was made... it was always on appeal when the Exec Committee got involved.
Did the attorneys find that LHSAA isn't following their own policies? IF so... just about every punishment that LHSAA has handed out has a problem.
Again... money. Without the money to hire attorneys to fight and dig into this... none of this happens.
Posted on 1/18/24 at 7:15 pm to LSUFanHouston
LHSAA has been pretty toothless the last few years.
If this stands, they may as well close the doors and reopen as a brand new organization.
If this stands, they may as well close the doors and reopen as a brand new organization.
Posted on 1/18/24 at 7:28 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
She said the LHSAA, even as a private organization, should be treated as a government agency because it oversees athletics for more than 400 schools, many of them public schools, out of about 440 in Louisiana.
Just because she says it, doesn’t mean it’s so
The LHSAA being a private organization has been litigated and settled
This post was edited on 1/18/24 at 7:29 pm
Posted on 1/18/24 at 7:44 pm to chalmetteowl
It is a voluntary membership organization on top of that.
If a school doesn’t want to be in the LHSAA, they can join the MPSAA or form a new iteration of LISA.
If a school doesn’t want to be in the LHSAA, they can join the MPSAA or form a new iteration of LISA.
Posted on 1/18/24 at 7:58 pm to chalmetteowl
quote:
Just because she says it, doesn’t mean it’s so
The LHSAA being a private organization has been litigated and settled
Either the LHSAA appeals this, or just remove the rulebook and let schools do whatever they want.
I think this gets slapped back by the court of appeals, but who knows how long that takes.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News