Started By
Message

re: Pretty amazing Brady/Patriots stat

Posted on 1/15/14 at 8:26 am to
Posted by maburu2
Member since Mar 2008
4715 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 8:26 am to
Facts:
Patriots without Tom Brady = 11-5
Colts without Peyton Manning = 2-14
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 8:28 am to
Posted by Hoyas
Member since Sep 2013
2478 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 8:32 am to
quote:

Logical or not you can not ignore the fact that "spygate" was a real thing and they have not been as dominant since. Still very good but not dominant like they were.


First of all, what point are you trying to make by saying the Patriots are 0-2 since "spygate"?

If anything you are only reinforcing the fact that "spygate" had nothing to do with previous victories?

Your post might make sense if the Patriots never made the playoffs again. The Patriots have made every playoff except in '08 and made it back to 2 Super Bowls because they build great teams. People bring up "spygate" still as if they lucked their way to a 16-0 season and 13-3 season since the "incident".

It couldn't possibly be that the New York Giants just happened to have the Patriots number?

Posted by Hoyas
Member since Sep 2013
2478 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 8:34 am to
quote:

Facts:
Patriots without Tom Brady = 11-5
Colts without Peyton Manning = 2-14


Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161246 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 8:36 am to
Brady/Manning debate.... Where is KneeHigh to tell us the 98 Colts had the #2 defense that year
Posted by lsutigers1992
Member since Mar 2006
25317 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 8:37 am to
Tom Brady has 7 TDs and 9 INTs in 7 career AFC Championships.

The Patriots are 5-2 in those games.

SO CLUTCH
Posted by gamecocks22
SC
Member since Dec 2012
4913 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 8:43 am to
quote:

First of all, what point are you trying to make by saying the Patriots are 0-2 since "spygate"? If anything you are only reinforcing the fact that "spygate" had nothing to do with previous victories?




So only Super Bowl losses count. Not making it to the Super Bowl is not considered a loss. Look Brady is awesome, but spygate happened and they haven't won the Super Bowl since, before that they were winning what felt like every year. IMO Brady is a better QB after the rings than while he was winning them. Its been 10 years since they won one.
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 8:48 am to
quote:

So only Super Bowl losses count. Not making it to the Super Bowl is not considered a loss. Look Brady is awesome, but spygate happened and they haven't won the Super Bowl since, before that they were winning what felt like every year. IMO Brady is a better QB after the rings than while he was winning them. Its been 10 years since they won one.



I love the people that make a big deal about Spygate, because it's painfully obvious you don't know dick about defensive playcalls and how often callouts are changed up in a game. It is still, and always will be, assumed teams are stealing signals, so they will literally be changed half to half, hell sometimes play to play.

Teams also have access to the all-22s, which will inform you a billion times more the tendencies of a defense. The idea that Belichick/staffer would be able to read a play call/adjustment across the field, tell his own players about it, and have the perfect play set up for it is not only laughable, it's so incredibly ignorant on how the game works that your opinion is invalid.
This post was edited on 1/15/14 at 8:50 am
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
65376 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 8:56 am to
quote:

2001--Brady injured, Bledsoe wins AFCCG


Let's not forget the "tuck rule" and Adam "Most Clutch Kicker of All Time" Vinetari.

Manning had Vandershank.
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
88161 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 8:59 am to
Here is a pretty amazing Manning stat

If the Broncos win this Sunday, it will make his 3rd trip to the Super Bowl with his 3rd different head coach

This post was edited on 1/15/14 at 9:36 am
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 9:02 am to
quote:

If the Broncos win this Sunday, it was make his 3rd trip to the Super Bowl with his 3rd different head coach





This hasn't been said enough. Also the guy came back from neck surgery, completely changed his game on the fly with a new set of WRs, and there has been zero dropoff of play. I have gained so much respect for Peyton through these last two years, and what he has done is beyond remarkable. As far as pure stats and mechanics, it's not even a question for me that Peyton is better than Tom Brady. I personally believe Tom makes up that ground on intangibles, but Peyton has mentored this group of young WRs to become insanely productive.

People that constantly argue Peyton vs. Manning are completely missing the point. We are lucky to see two of the best football players to ever step on the same field compete against eachother.
This post was edited on 1/15/14 at 9:09 am
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
157207 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 9:09 am to
Here is a pretty amazing Manning stat

As a family the Mannings have a higher percentage SB record (3-1) than Tom Brady (3-2)

That's including Archie
Posted by barry
Location, Location, Location
Member since Aug 2006
51395 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 9:11 am to
Bill>>>>Brady
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 9:13 am to
Posted by gamecocks22
SC
Member since Dec 2012
4913 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 9:21 am to
quote:

love the people that make a big deal about Spygate, because it's painfully obvious you don't know dick about defensive playcalls and how often callouts are changed up in a game. It is still, and always will be, assumed teams are stealing signals, so they will literally be changed half to half, hell sometimes play to play.


Painfully obvious?? Sorry o great defensive mind of tiger droppings. Many coaches and players in the NFL have commented on this. Not just me. Hell it was mentioned on a pregame show just last Sunday when discussing Brady and Bellechecks legacy. I know you think you are more of a football mind than John Harbaugh, but you are not.

I did not say it defintitely decided a game. Who could ever know that. They did what they did and it was against the rules. They just kept on doing in for no reason since it had no benefit. I never said they were reading every play, but who is to say it did not impact one play in one game. One play can make a huge difference. For anyone to say 100% that it did or did not have an impact, and act like that is a black and white fact is naive. No one knows except a few people that aren't going to say.
Posted by Moustache
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
21657 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 9:22 am to
quote:

Which is why I can't even understand how people in the Brady Manning debate even think there's a question.

Brady at his best is much better.


I know. And Brady has had much less to work with. He hasn't had a RB even close to Edgerrin James or Marvin Harrison/Reggie Wayne duo.

Brady had a 30 year old Moss who was declining and all of a sudden had his best career year with Brady. wonder why that is?
Posted by Moustache
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
21657 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 9:28 am to
quote:

We know the Patriots were cheaters, and we know that they haven't won anything since they've stopped cheating.



You do realize they weren't the only team doing this. Just the one who got caught. Just like the saints and the bounty bullshite.
Posted by tduecen
Member since Nov 2006
161246 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 9:57 am to
Well for one it wasn't because he was "declining" he just hated Oakland and had Aaron Brooks/Andrew Walter as his QB the year before his move to NE. They combined for 6TD and 21 INT.... Had for any WR to care/look good with those two
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
32270 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 10:26 am to
quote:

Brady had a 30 year old Moss who was declining and all of a sudden had his best career year with Brady. wonder why that is?



Hmm...I don't know, maybe everyone and their mom knew that he didn't give a flying frick when he was stuck in the black hole of the nfl.

Even Rice said Moss was a physical marvel and if Moss put in the same amount of effort that Rice did, Moss would've blown away every record that Rice held. Physical marvels don't just happen to 'lose it all at 30' and is revitalized by a top 5 QB.

Since Moss was on the decline, how come Brady has never had a season comparable to his '07 season? Since Moss sucked so bad and Brady made him awesome again, how come Brady couldn't do that with another receiver when Moss left/quit on the team?
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 10:38 am to
He did help a college QB catch 100 passes and 1k yards. He also has put up disgusting numbers constantly with Wes Welker and Gronk.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram