Started By
Message

re: Pretty amazing Brady/Patriots stat

Posted on 1/14/14 at 10:33 pm to
Posted by shaqfu33
Member since May 2007
200 posts
Posted on 1/14/14 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

Rushing yards per attempt:

NE - 4.4

Den - 4.1


Defense points allowed per game:

NE - 21.2

Den - 24.9




Ouch.


Now this man knows how to show some facts.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80520 posts
Posted on 1/14/14 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

The only time the 2 teams played head-to-head the Patriots won, so forgive me for not thinking that the Broncos are clearly the better team.


The Patriots only won because Brady >>>>> Manning and it's not even close.









































/sarcasm
Posted by Colonel Flagg
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2010
23483 posts
Posted on 1/14/14 at 10:57 pm to
Posted by BoardReader
Arkansas
Member since Dec 2007
7391 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 12:06 am to
I know this is a favorite MSB topic, but I saw this gif and could not keep it to myself.

This post was edited on 1/15/14 at 12:07 am
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 12:09 am to
quote:

because Brady's success is actually a camcorder's success.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116159 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 12:28 am to
Your schtick is tired
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 12:38 am to
No more camcorder, no more Super Bowls. I'm sure it's a coincidence.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116159 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 12:48 am to
Yeah, they just lucked into all those division and AFC titles too :/
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 12:50 am to
Never said they weren't good. Never even said they weren't great. But they've never proven on the field that they can win it all without a little extra help.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116159 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 12:54 am to
Yeah youre probably right. They wouldve deffinitly won in 08 if they had videoed a practice and saw how much stickem was on Tyrees helmet or how much holding the refs would allow on that play


And they deffinitly wouldve won in 11 if theyre camcorder wouldve told them that Julian Edleman probably wouldnt have been able to defend the giants recievers and to make the defense less terrible that year. Yeah thats logical
Posted by jg8623
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2010
13533 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 1:00 am to
The stick em on tyrees helmet is sarcasm right?
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 1:02 am to
None of your rhetoric amounts to anything. We know the Patriots were cheaters, and we know that they haven't won anything since they've stopped cheating.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116159 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 1:03 am to
Yes. Heavy coated
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116159 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 1:03 am to
Oh well, stay ignorant, makes no difference to me

Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 1:10 am to
quote:

Your schtick is tired
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116159 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 1:11 am to
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
76373 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 7:28 am to
When you first started posting, at least you had interesting points of view. It's sad that you've just turned into a troll.

Oh, and you better hate you some Jimmy Johnson's Cowboys teams, because he did the same thing.
Posted by gamecocks22
SC
Member since Dec 2012
4913 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 8:08 am to
quote:

Yeah youre probably right. They wouldve deffinitly won in 08 if they had videoed a practice and saw how much stickem was on Tyrees helmet or how much holding the refs would allow on that play And they deffinitly wouldve won in 11 if theyre camcorder wouldve told them that Julian Edleman probably wouldnt have been able to defend the giants recievers and to make the defense less terrible that year. Yeah thats logical



Logical or not you can not ignore the fact that "spygate" was a real thing and they have not been as dominant since. Still very good but not dominant like they were.

And maybe he is right. Maybe if they had the cameras out they would have had a bigger lead, the games might not have even been within one possesion for them to come back. This arguement is just as valid as yours. They cheated and it was a real thing. It does not mean Brady is not a good QB, but facts are facts. They did what they did and if anyone wants to question them or doubt the previous accomplishments, that is no ones fault but the Patriots for doing it in the first place. I know I have my doubts and am not naive enough to say "aw hell it didn't make a difference". That is bullshite, if it didn't matter then why do it in the first place.
This post was edited on 1/15/14 at 8:10 am
Posted by lsutigers1992
Member since Mar 2006
25317 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 8:13 am to
I'd go to the Super Bowl every year if the quarterback of the other team threw 50 percent of his the INT total he threw all year against me. And then my RBs ran for 409 yards and 5 touchdowns.

Or my kicker missed a 25 yard FG at the end of the AFC Championship Game.
This post was edited on 1/15/14 at 8:16 am
Posted by lsutigers1992
Member since Mar 2006
25317 posts
Posted on 1/15/14 at 8:22 am to
The Brady Super Bowl Years:

2001--Brady injured, Bledsoe wins AFCCG
2003--Peyton Manning throws 4 INTs in AFCCG
2004--Roethlisberger 3 INTs
2007--Tomlinson injured
2011--Cundiff misses chip shot to take game to OT after Lee Evans drops game winning TD
This post was edited on 1/15/14 at 8:24 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram