Started By
Message

re: Official Week 4 NFL Bet Thread

Posted on 9/30/15 at 6:49 pm to
Posted by jac1280
Member since Dec 2007
5380 posts
Posted on 9/30/15 at 6:49 pm to
Anyone like Piitsburgh +3 at home vs the Ravens?

Posted by Kill Switch
Miamisburg, OH
Member since Sep 2010
2387 posts
Posted on 9/30/15 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

Anyone like Piitsburgh +3 at home vs the Ravens?


Not with Vick starting.
Posted by bloupe2
Member since Apr 2011
2857 posts
Posted on 9/30/15 at 7:21 pm to
Hard to go against Pitt with all those skills position players. But Vick is garbage now idk. Might not play this one
Posted by ChemE in the OP
The Flats
Member since Apr 2011
6382 posts
Posted on 9/30/15 at 8:52 pm to
Full Week 4 Card ~

Bucs +3.5
Redskins +3.5 (2x Normal Bet)
Niners +9

Good luck!

Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66509 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 10:29 am to
Redskins +3 Locked in


Thursday Leans

Pitt +3
KC +4
STL +7
TB +3


quote:

Niners +9


I see where you're coming from, I just dont have the balls
Posted by ChemE in the OP
The Flats
Member since Apr 2011
6382 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 1:09 pm to
It meets all the criteria... Buy low on Niners, sell high on Pack, letdown and look-past spot for Pack, books need Niners. Etc, etc, etc.

I know it's disgusting but gotta roll with what has worked for me over the years.
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66509 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 1:19 pm to
yup.

i think public gets buried this weekend in nfl
Posted by dcrews
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2011
30237 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 3:19 pm to
Only on Was +3.5 & Tampa +3.5 so far. Not sure what else I want.
Posted by Howyouluhdat
On Fleek St
Member since Jan 2015
7533 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

It meets all the criteria... Buy low on Niners, sell high on Pack, letdown and look-past spot for Pack, books need Niners. Etc, etc, etc



Chem can you explain what exactly you mean by this for the novice bettors? Are you playing both?
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
82782 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 3:59 pm to
I feel like these factors are baked into the numbers just like sharps think things like "Aaron Rodgers homecoming, snubbed by 49ers, 0-3 against 49ers" are baked into the numbers. He's the best QB in NFL history and he's going to have a massive chip on his shoulder the difference between a 7 point spread and a 9.5 spread is negligible at best.

All this overthinking and graphing... "One team will cover and one team will not" is true of every sporting event ever played - NFL favorites have covered more games than NFL underdogs this season.

The guys who consistently bet on nothing but underdogs or fade the public are no better than Joe Schmoe who consistently bets only on favorites. The people who win the LVSupercontest bet on favorites and dogs alike. The guys who get profiled on "60 minutes" or on Bill Simmons bet on favorites and underdogs and steam alike.

We also have a clear hierarchy of the top 8 or so teams: NE, GB, SF, healthy Dallas, healthy Denver, Arizona, maybe Atlanta maybe Seattle, etc. also 8 crap teams like NO, TB, Cle, Jax, Ten, Chi, SF, etc.

This hierarchy coupled with super tight NFL lines makes Wong teasers (or variations thereof) a good play.
This post was edited on 10/1/15 at 4:18 pm
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
78096 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 4:24 pm to
Locked
Pitt+3
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
82782 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

It meets all the criteria... Buy low on Niners, sell high on Pack, letdown and look-past spot for Pack, books need Niners. Etc, etc, etc.


This is as subjective as anything squares say. Who's to say the Packers have played their best football yet? Who's to say they are going to have a "letdown" playing in a new NFL stadium for the first (maybe 2nd - did they play there last year?) time in their careers and on the National FOX broadcast with Aikman and Buck? Who's to say that the 49ers and Kaep haven't hit rock bottom yet? That's all fluff masquerading in "sharp" lingo.

I'm not disagreeing with your pick, if I had a gun to my head I might take the points as well, but if this is your method you're just good at picking games or getting lucky so far - you're using a system that (from what I can tell) isn't really superior to "buy what you know" which is what sums up my strategy.
This post was edited on 10/1/15 at 4:58 pm
Posted by ChemE in the OP
The Flats
Member since Apr 2011
6382 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 5:10 pm to
Obviously those are just generic screens to identify where perception may have created value... There's more work to do to hone in on good spots. Your use of language is so abrasive.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
82782 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 5:51 pm to
Sorry I'll try to do better.
Posted by bayoucracka
Member since Sep 2015
6830 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:05 pm to
Colts/Jags Over 48.
Posted by ChemE in the OP
The Flats
Member since Apr 2011
6382 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:13 pm to
No worries... How long have you followed these threads for?
Posted by dcrews
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2011
30237 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

Anyone like Piitsburgh +3 at home vs the Ravens?


Yep. I'm on em at +3

Go Steelers
Posted by Zipfer2022
Member since Nov 2011
3736 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 7:06 pm to
Pitt +3

1-5 YTD
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158822 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 7:09 pm to
Anyone got the public #s on tonight ?
Posted by Carson123987
Middle Court at the Rec
Member since Jul 2011
66509 posts
Posted on 10/1/15 at 7:11 pm to
59-41 Balty. Had some RLM earlier in the week

Just locked in PITT +3
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram