- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/17/21 at 3:32 pm to TheWalrus
quote:
I really don’t get the hate for the rule
It's really a situation where there isn't a good rule to make to deal with it. If it's anywhere else on the field the offense would get the ball back where the ball went out of bounds. However should a team be rewarded with a touchdown for fumbling out of bounds? If they are teams will intentionally try to fumble the ball through the end zone ala Dave Casper if they are at the end of a close game and a player is getting tackled short of the end zone and the offense doesn't have a time out. On the other hand if you put the football back at the spot of the fumble when the ball goes through the end zone why is the ball put at the spot the fumble went out of bounds anywhere else on the field? There is just no way to have a consistent principle behind the whole situation.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 3:32 pm to BFANLC
quote:the Browns have run 23 plays. 8 of them (35%) were for Chubb.
Browns need to get Chubb involved.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 3:33 pm to hashtag
The Browns D has been a trash can all year - not sure if they can do anything either way.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 3:33 pm to BFANLC
quote:
They won't win it without him.
Only chance is for Mahomes to develop late onset Downs at halftime.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 3:34 pm to 88Wildcat
quote:every fumble that goes out of bounds prior to a recovery is placed back to the spot of the fumble and given to the team who fumbled. Works everywhere on the field.
There is just no way to have a consistent principle behind the whole situation
Posted on 1/17/21 at 3:34 pm to BOSCEAUX
That’s obvious he hit him with hat.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 3:35 pm to Bham Bammer
quote:
Romo thinking the Browns should have called a timeout is idiotic. The chiefs cost themselves 25 seconds right there.
Chiefs were straddling the fence at that moment. Outside of field goal range on 3rd and relatively long. You don't want to stop the clock in case you don't make the first down but you don't want to eat clock in case you do make the first down.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 3:35 pm to lsupride87
quote:I will say that, by rule, it shoulda been called. However, I think I know the MSB well enough to know what the reaction would be with a few changes in circumstance.
Pretty sure I would always say the refs should throw the flag when you fly in with the crown of your helmet and your hands by your side
Posted on 1/17/21 at 3:35 pm to lsupride87
I just think that if the offensive player wasn't diving himself, we wouldn't even notice because guys tackle like that all the time
the replay does look like a more clear helmet to helmet than I remember in real-time, though
the replay does look like a more clear helmet to helmet than I remember in real-time, though
Posted on 1/17/21 at 3:36 pm to 88Wildcat
quote:Make the rule the exact same as every other fricking time a player fumbles it forward out of bounds
It's really a situation where there isn't a good rule to make to deal with it
It’s extremely easy and logical
Posted on 1/17/21 at 3:36 pm to G The Tiger Fan
quote:
will say that, by rule, it shoulda been called.
agreed
the second look sold me
Posted on 1/17/21 at 3:36 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
At least it's still a two possession game
Was thinking the same. Could’ve been way worse.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 3:36 pm to 88Wildcat
quote:just. rule. it. like. we. do. every. other. time. forward. fumbles. go. out. of. bounds
It's really a situation where there isn't a good rule to make to deal with it.
This post was edited on 1/17/21 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 1/17/21 at 3:36 pm to hashtag
quote:
every fumble that goes out of bounds prior to a recovery is placed back to the spot of the fumble and given to the team who fumbled. Works everywhere on the field.
No, it doesn't, only on 4th down is that the case. Any other time it is where the ball went out of bounds.
Posted on 1/17/21 at 3:37 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:I disagree guys tackle by flying parallel with their heads down and hands at their side nailing the offensive players head
I just think that if the offensive player wasn't diving himself, we wouldn't even notice because guys tackle like that all the time
Posted on 1/17/21 at 3:37 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
just. rule. it. like. we. do. every. other. time. forward. fumbles. go. out. of. bounds
see I disagree
the endzone has different rules, and it should
Posted on 1/17/21 at 3:37 pm to lsupride87
quote:
nailing the offensive players head
that's not what I said at all
Posted on 1/17/21 at 3:38 pm to NawlinsTiger9
then why stop at fumbles? if we agree the endzone is special and should be ruled differently, then why doesnt that apply to incompletions?
Posted on 1/17/21 at 3:38 pm to 88Wildcat
quote:
On the other hand if you put the football back at the spot of the fumble when the ball goes through the end zone why is the ball put at the spot the fumble went out of bounds anywhere else on the field?
It’s not. You can’t fumble the ball forward to advance it. It comes back to the spot of the fumble.
Page 19 of 110
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News