- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Next conference realignment predictions?
Posted on 7/1/22 at 8:36 am
Posted on 7/1/22 at 8:36 am
Now that UCLA and USC are plotting a move to the Big Ten, what are the next dominos to fall?
Here are what I see as the most attractive programs (football specifically) still out there that aren't in either the SEC or Big Ten. I've listed them in what I think is the order of attractiveness.
ACC:
Clemson (current performance and history)
Miami (history and TV market)
Florida State (history)
Big 12:
None
Pac 12:
Oregon (current performance)
Washington (history and TV market)
Independents:
Notre Dame (history and national following)
Others considered, but ruled out as not being as attractive as the others:
Stanford (attractive due to other sports and academics)
BYU (small market)
West Virginia (small market)
Oklahoma State (small market, and redundant to OU)
-I suspect that the Big Ten will push for Notre Dame and one of Oregon/Washington.
-I suspect that the SEC will push for Clemson and one of Miami/Florida State.
-I anticipate all of the others (including those schools not mentioned) will coalesce into another big conference and/or fall into a second tier of college football.
What are your predictions? Obviously, other sports may impact these decisions, as well as academic politics and intraconference dynamics (like Florida possibly not wanting FSU or Miami to join the SEC).
Here are what I see as the most attractive programs (football specifically) still out there that aren't in either the SEC or Big Ten. I've listed them in what I think is the order of attractiveness.
ACC:
Clemson (current performance and history)
Miami (history and TV market)
Florida State (history)
Big 12:
None
Pac 12:
Oregon (current performance)
Washington (history and TV market)
Independents:
Notre Dame (history and national following)
Others considered, but ruled out as not being as attractive as the others:
Stanford (attractive due to other sports and academics)
BYU (small market)
West Virginia (small market)
Oklahoma State (small market, and redundant to OU)
-I suspect that the Big Ten will push for Notre Dame and one of Oregon/Washington.
-I suspect that the SEC will push for Clemson and one of Miami/Florida State.
-I anticipate all of the others (including those schools not mentioned) will coalesce into another big conference and/or fall into a second tier of college football.
What are your predictions? Obviously, other sports may impact these decisions, as well as academic politics and intraconference dynamics (like Florida possibly not wanting FSU or Miami to join the SEC).
17
Posted on 7/1/22 at 8:44 am to kbroom
If the SEC's claim that schools like Clemson and FSU don't help their TV footprint then the BIG would probably like expanding their TV footprint into the South...
So the SEC either brings in Clemson FSU (may GA Tech, Miami, or UNC) to keep the BIG out of the South or see what happens
So the SEC either brings in Clemson FSU (may GA Tech, Miami, or UNC) to keep the BIG out of the South or see what happens
Posted on 7/1/22 at 8:47 am to kbroom
I know it's not relevant to the thread but I think Texas should play USC more often in football
Posted on 7/1/22 at 8:48 am to kbroom
we are gonna get the mother of all court battles if acc teams start bolting. that gor is brutal.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 8:51 am to kbroom
I wouldn't mind a Virginia Tech thrown in the mix. They seem to have an SEC feel to them
Posted on 7/1/22 at 8:54 am to kbroom
quote:Remember when Bowden was too cowardly to accept the SEC invite around 1992?
-I suspect that the SEC will push for Clemson and one of Miami/Florida State
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:01 am to kbroom
I'd expect Oregon/Washington to happen quickly and then a lull while the ACC schools try to figure out their legal situation.
I'd imagine Notre Dame takes their time. They'll always have a spot in the B1G if they want it.
I'd imagine Notre Dame takes their time. They'll always have a spot in the B1G if they want it.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:03 am to kbroom
If the Big10 is going to 20 like some suspect i think they would be wise to go after Colorado, Utah, Kansas and Notre Dame. The Colorado Utah and KS would help bridge that gap to CA and ND just makes too much sense for the Big. Big12 can take the scraps of the Pac12 and maybe the ACC can back fill with WV, Memphis, Cincy and UCF (if they would take it)
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:04 am to Cliff Booth
The Big 12 and PAC 12 might be well served to merge to salvage the league if that's even possible
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:07 am to kbroom
Oregon and Washington try desperately to join the big. If it succeeds, Pac-12 full collapses and we have chaos. If not, remainder of the Big12 and Pac12 merge.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:14 am to kbroom
Notre Dame to ACC or Big10 is the next big move. I think they'd need a partner though.
Maybe ND/USF or ECU to ACC?
Maybe ND/USF or ECU to ACC?
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:14 am to CU_Tigers4life
Big 12 is done.
What is left of the PAC12 will take Iowa State, Oklahoma State, Kansas, Kansas State and probably TCU.
No one want to touch Baylor.
UH, Cincy, UCF and BYU will have to get a new game plan….I guess go back to AAC?
The new super conferences will be 64 deep - if you ain’t in, you are screwed.
It makes the G look better - MWC, CUSA, AAC, Sunbelt, MAC - I think you will see some stabilization - but the dream to move up the chain is now over - the sharing of the wealth will be stopped.
NCAA is done.
What is left of the PAC12 will take Iowa State, Oklahoma State, Kansas, Kansas State and probably TCU.
No one want to touch Baylor.
UH, Cincy, UCF and BYU will have to get a new game plan….I guess go back to AAC?
The new super conferences will be 64 deep - if you ain’t in, you are screwed.
It makes the G look better - MWC, CUSA, AAC, Sunbelt, MAC - I think you will see some stabilization - but the dream to move up the chain is now over - the sharing of the wealth will be stopped.
NCAA is done.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:28 am to Cliff Booth
I am sure that ND wants to take their time, but I suspect that circumstances may force their hand. If teams start realigning, and ND starts losing some of their marquee matchups (namely due to expanded conference schedules), that may force their hand.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:40 am to kbroom
Houston might be able to make themselves appealing.
Major market, and the university has recently signaled a willingness to make major investments in athletics. On the strength of the basketball program, and with a commitment to continue investment in football, they could be appealing if the Big Ten wanted to fight their way into the Texas markets. Or if realignment snowballs into 20 team mega conferences, the SEC may make room for them if for no other reason than keeping the Big Ten out of the south.
Major market, and the university has recently signaled a willingness to make major investments in athletics. On the strength of the basketball program, and with a commitment to continue investment in football, they could be appealing if the Big Ten wanted to fight their way into the Texas markets. Or if realignment snowballs into 20 team mega conferences, the SEC may make room for them if for no other reason than keeping the Big Ten out of the south.
This post was edited on 7/1/22 at 9:43 am
Posted on 7/1/22 at 9:52 am to kbroom
I think Oregon is the next domino to fall maybe.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 10:00 am to funnystuff
quote:
Houston might be able to make themselves appealing.
Nope
It's a commuter school
I'm here in Houston, and they are barely a blip on the local radar. Everything is TAMU, LSU, UT on the college scene.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 10:23 am to kbroom
The SEC doesn't need Clemson or FSU. Miami, UNC and Colorado would give us new markets.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 10:35 am to AUCE05
quote:
The SEC doesn't need Clemson or FSU. Miami, UNC and Colorado would give us new markets.
I know the market aspect is a huge factor but you are overlooking the fact that certain matchup possibilities create their own market/ratings.
Adding Texas didn't put the SEC in the Texas market because the SEC already had Texas A&M. Oklahoma isn't a huge TV market but they have a huge following & a brand that will garner viewers.
Posted on 7/1/22 at 10:38 am to CU_Tigers4life
quote:
If the SEC's claim that schools like Clemson and FSU don't help their TV footprint then the BIG would probably like expanding their TV footprint into the South...
You do understand that the Big Ten would never take Clemson, right?
Posted on 7/1/22 at 10:40 am to kbroom
I'd be surprised to see anybody leave Big 12 or ACC. They seem like the next big conferences to add teams.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News