Started By
Message

re: Lomachenko vs Lopez. Who do you pick?

Posted on 10/18/20 at 12:06 am to
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
88765 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 12:06 am to
quote:

Loma was beating his arse 7 through 11
Eh.

He landed bigger punches through 7.

But he never once put together back to back rounds where we thought he was beating arse.

I was very impressed by Lopez tonight. Loma was just as fun to watch for me. But he wasn’t as engaged imo.
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
86529 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 12:06 am to
quote:

No rematch clause for this fight bro -


Money talks
Posted by Arthur Bach
Member since Jul 2016
2919 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 12:07 am to
quote:

Beats me, I have no idea.

I've probably watched his last 5 or 6 fights. He starts slow, feels a guy out, then goes off.

He has a very unique style with his movement, and he has a lot of flair and is a bit cocky.

Tonight, we saw none of that. Not sure why. When he started fighting, he dominated winning 4 of the last 5 rounds. No clue why he didn't do it earlier.


This. I’ve watched a few Loma fights and the first few rounds he’ll give then turn it up.

Ward had it even after 10. Andre Ward. Then a 119-109 for Lopez? C’mon.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112624 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 12:07 am to
quote:

But he never once put together back to back rounds where we thought he was beating arse.

I agree here to.

I think Loma clearly won 8 through 11, but it wasn't "beating his arse" type of winning rounds. It was just 4 solid rounds won.

Lopez's 12th was by far the most dominant round of the night.
Posted by habz007
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2007
4795 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 12:07 am to
quote:

8-11, he was still asleep in round 7. He didnt' start fighting until round 8.


You’re absolutely right.

I just rewatched round 7. He didn’t do shite.

I think I was just anxious to give him a round and make it a fight. Rd 7 was garbage.
Posted by Shotime
Atlanta
Member since Oct 2009
523 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 12:09 am to
quote:

Why would there ever be a clause now allowing a rematch?

A rematch clause is usually in place in case the champion loses. It guarantees that they receive an immediate chance to win their belt back if they lose.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112624 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 12:09 am to
quote:

You’re absolutely right.

I just rewatched round 7. He didn’t do shite.

I think I was just anxious to give him a round and make it a fight. Rd 7 was garbage.
Yea, I wanted to go back and rewatch that round as well, good stuff.

I kinda think almost every round had a somewhat clearcut winner, or at least as close to it as a boxing match usually has. Loma took 2 and 8 through 11. I don't really see much of an argument for Loma taking any other round than those.
Posted by DownSouthCrawfish
Lift every voice and sing
Member since Oct 2011
40583 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 12:09 am to
quote:

@CompuBox
·
11m
A tale of two fights for Loma, who landed just 31 punches in the first 7 rounds. Lopez fought a disciplined fight, landing an avg. of 15/55 punches per rnd. Loma came on in rnds 8 thru 11, but Lopez closed the show by landing a fight high 50 punches, the most ever by a Loma foe.


Loma was smoked in the 12th
This post was edited on 10/18/20 at 12:10 am
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112624 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 12:09 am to
quote:

A rematch clause is usually in place in case the champion loses. It guarantees that they receive an immediate chance to win their belt back if they lose.

So it's not really a "no rematch" but really just more of the loser can't guarantee a rematch next fight?

That makes sense
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
88765 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 12:10 am to
quote:

I've probably watched his last 5 or 6 fights. He starts slow, feels a guy out, then goes off.

He did that tonight.
quote:

He has a very unique style with his movement, and he has a lot of flair and is a bit cocky.
No doubt. I picked that up and he probably didn’t even come close to showing it like he typically does. I feel like he miscalculated something with his strategy.

I’d guess he felt things out a little bit too long into the fight. Then when he realized he needed to go HAM Lopez was truly better than he figured.

I thought the fight was enjoyable.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112624 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 12:12 am to
quote:

He did that tonight.
Well he usually does it in like round 3 or 4 then is completely dominant the rest of the way, not waiting til round 8 but still getting rocked in round 12.

Posted by Shotime
Atlanta
Member since Oct 2009
523 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 12:12 am to
quote:

So it's not really a "no rematch" but really just more of the loser can't guarantee a rematch next fight?

That makes sense


Correct. It's just weird in this situation bc they both have the same promoter (Bob Arum) and there was no rematch clause for the fight.
Posted by Arthur Bach
Member since Jul 2016
2919 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 12:14 am to
quote:

Money talks


My first thought
Posted by sms151t
Polos, Porsches, Ponies..PROBATION
Member since Aug 2009
140708 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 12:15 am to
Shakur Stephens will be PFP best now. Spence will be up there also.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
88765 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 12:15 am to
I made a comment to my girlfriend after round 8 that he was shockingly not out of breath at the end of the round.

I don’t know his style(outside of you describing it to me). But I thought he was 1. Insanely fit. And 2. Not using it to his advantage.
Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
28283 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 12:17 am to
quote:

they both have the same promoter (Bob Arum)


Oh. Well, this explains a lot.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
88765 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 12:20 am to
To add onto my last post, the announcers would have us believe Lopez has a devastating right but I never saw proof of it. Not even close.

I don’t really know about how long heavy favorites should slow play a fight but it surely looked like Lomachenko could have won if he came out using his superior ability early on. Like, in round 2 probably.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112624 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 12:21 am to
quote:

To add onto my last post, the announcers would have us believe Lopez has a devastating right but I never saw proof of it. Not even close.
Yea, they were ridiculously over the top most of the night in favor of Lopez.
Posted by emanresu
Member since Dec 2009
9810 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 12:21 am to
A "rematch clause" give the loser an automatic entitlement to a rematch. The absence of a rematch clause does not mean that the fighters can't agree to do it anyway.

There will be a rematch of this fight.
This post was edited on 10/18/20 at 12:23 am
Posted by DownSouthCrawfish
Lift every voice and sing
Member since Oct 2011
40583 posts
Posted on 10/18/20 at 12:25 am to
Jump to page
Page First 18 19 20 21
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 20 of 21Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram