Started By
Message

re: LHSAA’s definition of “Select” taken to court - playoff picture blurry

Posted on 8/22/23 at 12:10 pm to
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
36611 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

There has never been a definition of "select" voted on by the LHSAA membership.



im pretty damn sure too that its not in the by laws that they have to either. pretty sure it could be done by the EC. and EC could make changes so long as those changes were sent by email and you had certain number of days to challenge

i believe it was something like 80% of emails about the change over before last year, that were sent to principals, went unread.

well at some point thats on the principals.

and last years playoffs were the best they have been in a long long time in all sports

keep it
get rid of districts
get rid of 1a, 2a 5a etc and go div 1/2/3/4/5 and select/non select and try to have even numbers in all classes.

playoffs for top 16 or 32 depending on class size.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53617 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

There has never been a definition of "select" voted on by the LHSAA membership.


Maybe but it definitely wasn’t random
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49053 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

Maybe but it definitely wasn’t random


How so?
Posted by RGJ18
Collierville, TN
Member since Feb 2010
9213 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

Catholic has benefited greatly from having "feeder" schools from everywhere.

How? You can count on one hand the number of kids that have played and contributed to any varsity sport at Catholic their freshman year. The first kid that Coach Weiner even allowed to dress out varsity as a freshman was CEH in 2013 and that was only because Clyde went to Catholic as an 8th grader.

The "play varsity your first year so we can cheat the system" isn't a thing at Catholic like you are trying to make it out to be.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53617 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

Maybe but it definitely wasn’t random How so?


Maybe I have the lowest standard, but the whole Catholic League was select. St Paul’s and Catholic BR were select. John Curtis and Evangel were select

One more question… they ruled that we go back to 21’s definition of select and nonselect. Do we stay with the four equal divisions for select and nonselect in the playoffs?
This post was edited on 8/22/23 at 1:14 pm
Posted by LCLa
Member since Apr 2017
4382 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 1:14 pm to
There aren’t very many schools in your second category.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49053 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

they ruled that we go back to 21’s definition of select and nonselect.


FYI, that is not what was ruled.
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81417 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

Never really thought about it. But I guess that explains why there weren't freshmen on the varsity team. I always thought it was a Weiner/Athletic Dept thing.


Travis Minor played as a frosh. He only grew up 45 minutes away though
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108243 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

Travis Minor played as a frosh
Nope

He played 94,95,96

Clyde was the first and only player to play as a freshman under Dale. And like someone else mentioned, he attended 8th grade Catholic. The Catholic attendance zone was extremely small

We thought I would be eligible my freshman year because Riverbend is in McKinley’s zone. It got denied b/c apparently it’s only part of McKinleys zone that was eligible for Catholic.
This post was edited on 8/22/23 at 2:46 pm
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
40200 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 3:42 pm to
It's time for this split to come to the eventual conclusion.

One of two things need to happen, and at this point, I could care less which one is chosen.

1) The split is permanent. We go with 8 classes - 4 select, 4 non-select, much like what we saw last year. However, the classes are set for the entire season, not just playoffs. SO we redistrict the state into new districts for each class. Crossover games are allowed, so Chalmette and Holy Cross, etc could continue to meet in non-district.

2) We get rid of the split completely and go back to the old system.

Either option would be far better than what we have now.
Posted by choupiquesushi
yaton rouge
Member since Jun 2006
33723 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 4:04 pm to
quote:

One more question… they ruled that we go back to 21’s definition of select and nonselect. Do we stay with the four equal divisions for select and nonselect in the playoffs?
. The traditional public schools were fed up with charters, magnets and open enrollment schools , the EC and the membership in general will fix this -
Posted by donut
Face, USA
Member since Jan 2004
3122 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

I couldn’t play varsity my freshman year at Catholic because I wasn’t in district


That's not why you didn't play varsity your freshmanyear
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108243 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

That's not why you didn't play varsity your freshmanyear
Yes, yes it was

Football isn’t the only sport that exists
This post was edited on 8/22/23 at 5:12 pm
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53617 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 5:12 pm to
So as of right now we’re back to 5 classes and 4 select divisions?

Posted by blueboxer1119
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2013
9560 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 5:17 pm to
quote:

How
?

According to Antonio Moss, this is how.

quote:

In the past, there was the Same School System exception to residential eligibility. If a kid matriculates from a feeder school within the same school system, then they are granted full eligibility.


What schools are in the feeder system for Catholic High and where are they located?
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
49053 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 5:36 pm to
Somehow Catholic High benefits from a rule that applies to everyone.

Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
108243 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

blueboxer1119
You have ignored me this entire thread

Lived in riverbend, went to st. Aloysius, not eligible freshman year

Nola- lived near Highland, went to st. Jude, not eligible freshman year

I could go on and on. I can’t even remember a single freshman ever getting eligible unless they went to 8th grade Catholic

There was no feeder school anything from 2003-2006, and I know there wasn’t any available either until at least 2012
Posted by AtlantaLSUfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2009
26651 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 6:00 pm to
There has to be a better way to stop play transfers for sports. Public schools are getting destroyed for recruiting but private schools, for some reason, take players from the hood and place their paying students on the bench. All for a stupid trophy.
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
42368 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

ublic schools said those "white Christian private schools" were cheating by legally recruiting players to attend their schools.


Recruiting players has been against LHSAA rules for as long as I can remember. That's back into the 70s. Of course, it always happened to some degree.

Posted by HighRoller
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2011
5379 posts
Posted on 8/22/23 at 6:30 pm to
It’s funny that people think the private schools are the only cheaters. Public schools are just as bad or worse.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram