- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/14/13 at 12:48 pm to KingRanch
quote:
theres no "possibly" about it, he got favorable and preferential treatment
Yep, but he's probably the only one that would have been caught doing this crap. Do you honestly think anyone would have called and ratted them out if it had been, say, Rory? No.
Posted on 4/14/13 at 12:48 pm to threeputt
quote:
Is rule 33 the tv rule? If it is does not apply here .. I can not believe they used it. by using it here it sets a terrible example. I can not wait for someine to just go out there and cheat like a mutha fricker. If he gets caught just claum the tv rule ..
As I've said before, this was the Augusta rules committee going CYA. They fricked up by determining that Tiger acted appropriately without thoroughly investigating by asking him what happened and letting him sign his card when they knew there was an issue. They definitely improperly invoked rule 33-7 to save their own arse. And I agree the precedent is awful.
Posted on 4/14/13 at 12:50 pm to iheartlsu
quote:
No one would have seen the drop and he wouldn't have a post round interview
This.
...and if there is favoritism - and there is - I don't know why people are just cluing into this - sports is entertainment and entertainment is big business. They're not going to DQ the guy everyone is tuning in to see over some ticky-tack. This isn't amateur sports and even amateur sports are now so rife with TV money it's about profit.
CBS isn't paying the Masters X amount of dollars to showcase people not named Tiger. Lawsuit.
Posted on 4/14/13 at 12:51 pm to RileyTime
quote:
Do you honestly think anyone would have called and ratted them out if it had been, say, Rory? No
yes, they get hundreds of calls each week on players that you've never heard of, however, they should not have cited rule 33 because it was tigers comments after the round that led to his 2 stroke penalty that should have been a DQ
Posted on 4/14/13 at 12:53 pm to lsugolf1105
Mad at both .. The conmittee a little more than tiger because I expected them to do the correct thing. Tiger, not so much
Posted on 4/14/13 at 12:54 pm to threeputt
quote:
Tiger, not so much
yeah, we know he doesn't do the right thing
Thug POS
Posted on 4/14/13 at 12:56 pm to KingRanch
Why do you just try and stir the pot?
Posted on 4/14/13 at 12:56 pm to threeputt
Thats way I could give a frick about the masters this year and not really watching
Posted on 4/14/13 at 12:59 pm to Fruitcake
quote:
“It would have never been brought up,” former LSU golfer John Peterson said after his round.
FIFY
Posted on 4/14/13 at 12:59 pm to Hook Em Horns
quote:
Why do you just try and stir the pot?
i like to cook
Posted on 4/14/13 at 1:07 pm to Fruitcake
Peterson needs to shut up.
Posted on 4/14/13 at 1:07 pm to KingRanch
kingranch and threeputt, do you guys believe venturi that palmer cheated in the 1958 masters? or do you believe palmer? which one of these guys is a thug POS?
Posted on 4/14/13 at 1:09 pm to lsugolf1105
quote:
kingranch and threeputt, do you guys believe venturi that palmer cheated in the 1958 masters?
i'm 27 years old, i have no clue wtf you're talking about
Posted on 4/14/13 at 1:13 pm to KingRanch
I really dont either but in golf historically it falls on the player. this time tiger admitted to cheating thus not signing a correct scorecard and not only did he not WD or get DQ like he should have he us allowed to continue to play. Im telling you its like the WWE 
This post was edited on 4/14/13 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 4/14/13 at 1:17 pm to threeputt
quote:
this time tiger admitted to cheating thus not signing a correct scorecard and not only did he not WD or get DQ like he should have he us allowed to continue to play.
it really is a shame
Posted on 4/14/13 at 1:18 pm to threeputt
If Tiger finishes more than 2 strokes off the lead will,people be upset with how much of their lives they wasted talking about something that ended up not mattering at all?
Posted on 4/14/13 at 1:19 pm to threeputt
Enough with the WWE stuff. And Palmer was involved in a rules controversy. His ball was embedded and the official didn't give him the relief he thought he entitled to. Palmer made double bogey, then decided to drop as he felt he was entitled to and made par with a second ball. They ended up counting the 2nd score and Palmer won. Venturi claimed that Palmer could play a 2nd ball, but he had to do so concurrently with the first and announce that is what he was doing.
Popular
Back to top



1





