Started By
Message

re: Is Trout the next Babe Ruth?

Posted on 3/6/20 at 10:00 am to
Posted by CelticDog
Member since Apr 2015
42867 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 10:00 am to
quote:

I’d say that’s all time great



but not the babe ruth of era.

lead league in hr year after year.

mike schmidt did it and was elite fielder too.

mike schmidt was challenged by kingman. right there.

no one challenged ruth.

just a dumb thread.










i wont ask to pitch in ws.

just do something eye popping.
Posted by Speedy G
Member since Aug 2013
3984 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 10:01 am to
MLB average in high leverage was .254/.334/.429 (.763).

Trout’s career:
.315/.456/.574 (1.030).
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216119 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 11:06 am to
When Trout cones up with numbers like this....


.378 59 hr 177 rbi 171 runs


For a season we can talk. These numbers will never be matched
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 11:16 am to
Nobody can be Babe Ruth because the viewing public is a lot more fractured.

Hell, I don't see as much in terms of documentaries/long form stories on Michael Jordan as I do on Ruth and he is the closest in my lifetime to that sort of universal regard.
Posted by TheeRealCarolina
Member since Aug 2018
17925 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 11:17 am to
Because OPS was viewed the same in the 80s through the mid 90s as it is now, right?
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 11:17 am to
quote:

Hell, I don't see as much in terms of documentaries/long form stories on Michael Jordan as I do on Ruth and he is the closest in my lifetime to that sort of universal regard.


Jordan's life isn't over yet.
Once he dies he'll surpass. Especially since his brand is worth over a billion dollars.
Posted by beauchristopher
Member since Jan 2008
72227 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 12:07 pm to
Why was Babe Ruth only a 2 time all-star?

Did the all star game not exist until a certain season of his career?
Posted by Stretch Suba
Member since Jun 2019
1300 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 12:14 pm to
Not even close.
Posted by Stretch Suba
Member since Jun 2019
1300 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 12:15 pm to
There was no All-Star game until 1933.
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 12:24 pm to
quote:


Why was Babe Ruth only a 2 time all-star?


I ask the same thing about why Cy Young never won a Cy Young
Posted by Master of Sinanju
Member since Feb 2012
11890 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

Why was Babe Ruth only a 2 time all-star? 

Did the all star game not exist until a certain season of his career?


Yes. Also, in those days you could only win the MVP once. After that, you were not eligible.
This post was edited on 3/6/20 at 2:20 pm
Posted by McCaigBro69
TigerDroppings Premium Member
Member since Oct 2014
45289 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

Gallo is the ultimate 2 possible outcomes guy


I’m assuming you didn’t watch a single game of his last year.
Posted by beauchristopher
Member since Jan 2008
72227 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 1:11 pm to


Posted by Hot Carl
Prayers up for 3
Member since Dec 2005
62042 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

378 59 hr 177 rbi 171 runs


For a season we can talk. These numbers will never be matched



Bonds already shite all over those. In multiple seasons.
Posted by The Seaward
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2006
11514 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

Bonds already shite all over those. In multiple seaso


Bonds 2001-2004 numbers are still hard to wrap my mind around, but “shite all over” is a bit strong. Babe was throwing up slash lines like .376/.533/.849 and .378/.512/.846 after all.
Posted by GeauxtigersMs36
The coast
Member since Jan 2018
12440 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 1:26 pm to
LINK
Talks about causes that ended the “dead ball era” great read. I can’t imagine how many homeruns Ruth would have in ball parks today.
Posted by TheeRealCarolina
Member since Aug 2018
17925 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 1:46 pm to
Barry Bonds never had more than 137 rbis in a season nor did he ever have more than 129 runs in a season but yeah sure.

Babe had the second most RBIs in history and 4th most runs scored. He finished with 50 less runs scored than Barry in 2,000 less plate appearances.
Posted by BRIllini07
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2015
3180 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 1:47 pm to
“The next Babe Ruth” requires Trout to reach the Babe’s status as a legend as well as a ballplayer, which will never happen.

The “time machine” question where you drop each player into another’s era to determine the better player has too many variables to account for.

What happens if you take the liquor bottle from the Babe and give him modern training, and then drop him in 2020 and let him take his hacks against some 95+MPH Loogies from the 5th inning onward? Who knows?

Take Trout out of a modern training regimen and put him in the NY spot light, remove all access to scouring reports and video, but give him the chance to see the same gassed pitchers over and over again after they throw 20 straight complete games on 3 days rest.... what happens? Who knows...
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 1:50 pm to
Also won more
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
8147 posts
Posted on 3/6/20 at 2:05 pm to
When Babe Ruth hit 60 home runs in 1927, he hit 14% of all home runs in his league that year. For a player to hit 14% of all home runs today, he would have to hit over 300 home runs in one season.
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram