- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: inspired by the tiger woods athletic thread (soccer)
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:51 pm to St Augustine
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:51 pm to St Augustine
I think yes. Not necessarily because the top NFL/NBA guys would be good, (though they could be, or not. It's possible that Lebron could be good at soccer, but also possible he wouldn't be good) but I'm sure there are some guys that, for example are good athletes that play, say, D-3 level football, or lower D-1 basketball and would be amazing at soccer, but are never exposed to it, because it's "not cool", it isn't available in their area they grew up in, they don't think the opportunities in soccer would be as good as other sports, etc. So I guess what I'm saying is if soccer was the CLEAR #1 sport in this country, then yes we'd be WC contenders, though not necessarily just from proffessional athletes (though I'm sure there are a few of them that would be good, too.)
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:51 pm to TheCaterpillar
That doesn't change the answer. You are all assuming great athleticism automatically will translate to success in soccer if they are trained that way. It's not that easy, and in the end people really have no idea what the skill required to play soccer at a high level is. Being a physical freak like LeBron doesn't mean you will be able to play soccer. Even if you are raised playing it, doesn't mean you will be good at it.
Athletic ability does not equal success in sports. It can be a precursor and help, but there is much more to soccer than most Americans apparently seem to realize.
Using your feet to control a ball is completely different from running with it in your hands, catching it, etc. Even with practice, all the athleticism in the world doesn't do a lick of good for some people.
Athletic ability does not equal success in sports. It can be a precursor and help, but there is much more to soccer than most Americans apparently seem to realize.
Using your feet to control a ball is completely different from running with it in your hands, catching it, etc. Even with practice, all the athleticism in the world doesn't do a lick of good for some people.
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:53 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
quote:
i would pick cristiano in a race against lebron.
Might be interesting... I would venture to say he might edge LeBron in the 40 but LeBron would take him in the 100 by a decent margin.
quote:
cristiano ronaldo is a world class athlete, and he would not be successful in the nba. same goes for lebron and soccer.
So you're saying given LeBron's skillset, it's absurd to assume that if he ate, slept, and drank soccer from early childhood he couldn't share the same success as some of the best keepers in the world?
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:53 pm to GeauxBob
this is pretty much what i was trying to say. lebron is a better athlete than cristiano, that was a bad example, but cristiano is still a world class athlete.
that does not translate to success in soccer and im pretty sure soccer is the one major world sport that people in america have no fricking clue about being good at it.
that does not translate to success in soccer and im pretty sure soccer is the one major world sport that people in america have no fricking clue about being good at it.
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:56 pm to GeauxBob
quote:
That doesn't change the answer. You are all assuming great athleticism automatically will translate to success in soccer if they are trained that way. It's not that easy, and in the end people really have no idea what the skill required to play soccer at a high level is. Being a physical freak like LeBron doesn't mean you will be able to play soccer. Even if you are raised playing it, doesn't mean you will be good at it.
Athletic ability does not equal success in sports. It can be a precursor and help, but there is much more to soccer than most Americans apparently seem to realize.
Using your feet to control a ball is completely different from running with it in your hands, catching it, etc. Even with practice, all the athleticism in the world doesn't do a lick of good for some people.
I picked Lebron to be a goalie.
I think Bo Jackson, if trained from an early age, could be an all-star in any sport he wanted. Same with Deion Sanders, Jason Williams (white boy), Charlie Ward, Allen Iverson, etc.
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:57 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
I can appreciate what you guys are saying. But to be honest with you, every sport requires more than athleticism. I mean, if we were having the same conversation about the "best" athletes playing baseball, there would be baseball purists screaming bloody murder that there are so many other aspects to the game besides speed, strength, and size.
But it sure as hell don't hurt.
ETA: I don't think either of you would argue that if we took a large enough subset of any population and trained them all equally to play soccer, the best athletes (the strongest, fastest, and most explosive) would on average be better players than their counterparts who may be only above-average athletes.
But it sure as hell don't hurt.
ETA: I don't think either of you would argue that if we took a large enough subset of any population and trained them all equally to play soccer, the best athletes (the strongest, fastest, and most explosive) would on average be better players than their counterparts who may be only above-average athletes.
This post was edited on 5/14/09 at 10:00 pm
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:58 pm to Stagg8
Keeper may be the only position that it could translate too since upper body reflexes and length are much more key.
People love to make this argument as an excuse for US soccer sucking. In fact, it has absolutely nothing to do with it. Stop the bullshite set up of the developmental programs and give the best players we have now to develop instead of little rich kids and their families, and maybe you'll have a shot.
People love to make this argument as an excuse for US soccer sucking. In fact, it has absolutely nothing to do with it. Stop the bullshite set up of the developmental programs and give the best players we have now to develop instead of little rich kids and their families, and maybe you'll have a shot.
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:58 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
ronaldo is an amazing athlete no doubt, but lebron can jump higher, is naturally stronger, and faster.
its absurd to think you couldnt replace guys like alexi lalas and landon donovan with dwayne wades, lebron james, and cp3s.
our american elite all-time soccer stars are slow turds compared to some nba superstars.
its absurd to think you couldnt replace guys like alexi lalas and landon donovan with dwayne wades, lebron james, and cp3s.
our american elite all-time soccer stars are slow turds compared to some nba superstars.
This post was edited on 5/14/09 at 9:59 pm
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:59 pm to Stagg8
Well, I don't think football players would be great soccer players besides receivers or DBs. Most Center Backs aren't giant bodies same with LB/RB. That said our athletes get the best training and if the game was popularized in urban areas, we would wreck.
KG: Shut down goalie
Kobe: Winger
KG: Shut down goalie
Kobe: Winger
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:59 pm to Stagg8
I feel like it parallels to white people in the 50s and 60s saying black people, just because they are bigger, faster, stronger, aren't better basketball players because they don't have skills. Well after decades of young black men and women focusing on basketball, we have our current NBA and WNBA dominated by them.
Posted on 5/14/09 at 10:02 pm to Stagg8
to clarify things a little I'm not necessarily saying that it has to be the present pro athletes in our country...I'm talking about elite US athletes as a whole picking soccer over the traditional american sports.... also assume that coaching/developmental programs are all the same
Posted on 5/14/09 at 10:02 pm to Stagg8
quote:
LeBron would take him in the 100 by a decent margin.
this is hilarious, especially given your previous statement. if you reversed them, you might have some credibility here.
Posted on 5/14/09 at 10:03 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
quote:
this is hilarious, especially given your previous statement. if you reversed them, you might have some credibility here.
Say huh?
Tall guys do better in intermediate sprints (see Usain Bolt). Shorter guys do much better in shorter sprints (see Trindon Holliday).
This isn't exactly a bold statement.
Posted on 5/14/09 at 10:03 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
quote:
this is hilarious, especially given your previous statement. if you reversed them, you might have some credibility here.
I agree with him. Ronaldo is probably quicker, but Lebron's strides would take the 100 M.
Posted on 5/14/09 at 10:03 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
our american elite all-time soccer stars are slow turds compared to some nba superstars.
Jozy Altidore begs to differ.
Posted on 5/14/09 at 10:03 pm to Stagg8
Basically, yes. I have seen what good training in soccer can do for a young, athletic black kid in this country
Posted on 5/14/09 at 10:04 pm to Stagg8
I sure as hell can argue it. You assume that being a great athlete and excelling at one sport means it will translate to another. This is utter bullshite. Not only is there completely different skillsets involved. You develop skills, you have athletic ability. They are not the same thing.
Worst of all you claim that being the biggest, strongest, fastest automatically makes these guys a cut above. That's bullshite and in soccer evenmoreso is useless. Soccer is as much mental as it is physical. Basketball compares in no way to it. all other sports have timeouts. All other sports have chances for the coaches to tell you what to do (see football) between each play.
Soccer is much more cerebral and thus your claims are stupid. This isn't to say that Lebron and others listed aren't smart enough for soccer, but its a totally different style of game. Even those who live and breath it, don't get it 90% of the time. It takes a very special player to have both the skill and intellect to play soccer. Its not to take away anything from other sports, I just thinks its retarded to try and compare these sports to each other purely on athleticism.
Worst of all you claim that being the biggest, strongest, fastest automatically makes these guys a cut above. That's bullshite and in soccer evenmoreso is useless. Soccer is as much mental as it is physical. Basketball compares in no way to it. all other sports have timeouts. All other sports have chances for the coaches to tell you what to do (see football) between each play.
Soccer is much more cerebral and thus your claims are stupid. This isn't to say that Lebron and others listed aren't smart enough for soccer, but its a totally different style of game. Even those who live and breath it, don't get it 90% of the time. It takes a very special player to have both the skill and intellect to play soccer. Its not to take away anything from other sports, I just thinks its retarded to try and compare these sports to each other purely on athleticism.
Posted on 5/14/09 at 10:04 pm to St Augustine
quote:
to clarify things a little I'm not necessarily saying that it has to be the present pro athletes in our country...I'm talking about elite US athletes as a whole picking soccer over the traditional american sports
Yeah, that's kind of what I was saying.
Posted on 5/14/09 at 10:06 pm to GeauxBob
quote:
Soccer is much more cerebral and thus your claims are stupid.
You're right. The U.S. soccer team isn't moving toward more and more athletic guys... Oguchi Onyewu and Jozi Altidore probably don't owe most of their success to raw athleticism.
ETA: U.S. Soccer for years (and commentators have routinely agreed) has tried to drive home the fact that the game has to grow nationally to the point where elite athletes are playing it in order for the U.S. to join the upper crust of international soccer. I don't really see how this is such a revolutionary opinion.
This post was edited on 5/14/09 at 10:10 pm
Popular
Back to top


0



