Started By
Message
locked post

inspired by the tiger woods athletic thread (soccer)

Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:22 pm
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
72093 posts
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:22 pm
If the top athletes in our country grew up playing and obsessed with soccer (deon sanders, reggie bush, Lebron, devon hester as examples) would we be in the top 3 perennial WC contenders...


not a big soccer fan but was interested in comparison of athletic ability
Posted by Froman
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2007
38902 posts
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:26 pm to
I think so, we have the best athletes in the world, and if someone like Barry Sanders or Walter Payton played Soccer, a lot of foreign mother frickers would have nursed some broken ankles and broken dreams.
Posted by Stagg8
Houston
Member since Jan 2005
13454 posts
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:28 pm to
This is true to a large extent. Even soccer seems to be getting bigger, but I can't help but think that guys like Jeff Demps or Noel Devine might be tough to hang with on a long run.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
104006 posts
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:29 pm to
quote:

If the top athletes in our country grew up playing and obsessed with soccer (deon sanders, reggie bush, Lebron, devon hester as examples) would we be in the top 3 perennial WC contenders...

I think we would be legit contenders at every level if soccer was the #1 sport locally.
Posted by lsutiger2486
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
6761 posts
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:31 pm to
I believe we would definitely be a power in soccer. I think that a lot of the elite basketball players are probably in the running for best athletes in the world. The majority are huge and nimble. They also have a lot of stamina with the constant up and down the court at a fast pace.

I could see a player like Wade being unbelievable in soccer had that been his passion.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:32 pm to
lebron james might make a pretty sick nasty goalie. talk about range and ball skills.
Posted by Stagg8
Houston
Member since Jan 2005
13454 posts
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

lebron james might make a pretty sick nasty goalie. talk about range and ball skills.


Yeah, I was thinking Dwight Howard.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
72093 posts
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:34 pm to
i was thinking Lebron would be a brutal striker if he grew up doing it

could you imagine Bo Jackson as a defenseman

someone who legitimately knows soccer should post a potential united states dream team of guys
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:35 pm to
that was my first choice, but then I got to thinking that there really is a point when you can be too tall for a goalie (i.e. too far from the ground for dives). I think lebron is MUCH faster and has better reflexes and hands too.
Posted by Stagg8
Houston
Member since Jan 2005
13454 posts
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

that was my first choice, but then I got to thinking that there really is a point when you can be too tall for a goalie (i.e. too far from the ground for dives). I think lebron is MUCH faster and has better reflexes and hands too.


True... I missed potentially one of the best guys... not as tall as LeBron but a pretty good leaper in his own rights and much better hands... Larry Fitzgerald.
Posted by GeauxBob
Member since Sep 2008
2904 posts
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:37 pm to
In a single word, No. People seem to think athletic ability and training are all that it takes to be great at a sport. Soccer is a completely different animal compared to almost another sport. Being big and fast would help, but it isn't going to catapult the US into soccer royalty.

Almost every other sport in the world focuses on a huge amount of hand eye coordination. Foot and leg coordination is completely different. It's not about power in soccer. It can help, but can hurt as much as it would improve things.

I really think that there is a completely different mentality to the game as well, which is why England's national team has sucked and not won in so long. The US would definitely still be a long-ball team and while their set pieces may improve, its not like football where brute force helps. Its not like hockey for the same reason. Forget baseball, the lazy sport. Basketball would not help with the endurance, but would help with an indoor type system.

In the end, it may improve the potential, but not by much. The problem the US has is that the better soccer players aren't the ones being brought onto the national team and its developmental sections. It's all little rich kids and that's the US' problem.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:37 pm to
great defenseman could be:

Ed Reed
Bo Jackson
Herschel Walker
Ronnie Lott

and many many more choices
Posted by Stagg8
Houston
Member since Jan 2005
13454 posts
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:39 pm to
Dude, the hypothetical is what if soccer was the #1 sport in the US.

ETA: Meaning if you could take guys with the athleticism of top American athletes and train them up from childhood like other countries have.
This post was edited on 5/14/09 at 9:40 pm
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:40 pm to
quote:

In a single word, No. People seem to think athletic ability and training are all that it takes to be great at a sport. Soccer is a completely different animal compared to almost another sport. Being big and fast would help, but it isn't going to catapult the US into soccer royalty.

Almost every other sport in the world focuses on a huge amount of hand eye coordination. Foot and leg coordination is completely different. It's not about power in soccer. It can help, but can hurt as much as it would improve things.

I really think that there is a completely different mentality to the game as well, which is why England's national team has sucked and not won in so long. The US would definitely still be a long-ball team and while their set pieces may improve, its not like football where brute force helps. Its not like hockey for the same reason. Forget baseball, the lazy sport. Basketball would not help with the endurance, but would help with an indoor type system.

In the end, it may improve the potential, but not by much. The problem the US has is that the better soccer players aren't the ones being brought onto the national team and its developmental sections. It's all little rich kids and that's the US' problem.


we are not saying get these athletes to convert to soccer players, but what if they had grown up focusing on soccer their WHOLE LIVES and had these god given bodies, speed, balance, etc.


ETA: if they had, we'd be bad arse in soccer internationally
This post was edited on 5/14/09 at 9:41 pm
Posted by NOLATiger86
New Orleans
Member since Oct 2005
8288 posts
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:40 pm to
quote:

In a single word, No


you dont know that. if they grew up playing soccer instead of playing bball or football... they would be some sick soccer players

ETA: youre an idiot
This post was edited on 5/14/09 at 9:41 pm
Posted by Stagg8
Houston
Member since Jan 2005
13454 posts
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:45 pm to
Granted an equally interesting hypothetical would be...

choose one country (and support your argument) that could legitimately compete with the U.S. in American football if their athletes were trained similarly to current American football players.
Posted by rockchlkjayhku11
Cincinnati, OH
Member since Aug 2006
36744 posts
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:45 pm to
there would be, but you people saying that lebron and company would be sick soccer players are equally as dumb.

fwiw, players like cristiano ronaldo and the elite players are equally as athletic as those guys, just in different ways.
Posted by Stagg8
Houston
Member since Jan 2005
13454 posts
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

fwiw, players like cristiano ronaldo and the elite players are equally as athletic as those guys, just in different ways.


In what non-sport-specific way is Cristiano Ronaldo a better athlete than LeBron James?
Posted by rockchlkjayhku11
Cincinnati, OH
Member since Aug 2006
36744 posts
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:50 pm to
i dunno i just meant different aspects. i would pick cristiano in a race against lebron. there are just different skills and talents. cristiano ronaldo is a world class athlete, and he would not be successful in the nba. same goes for lebron and soccer.
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41887 posts
Posted on 5/14/09 at 9:50 pm to
quote:

players like cristiano ronaldo and the elite players are equally as athletic as those guys, just in different ways.


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram