Started By
Message

re: ESPN - Let Zion Williamson choose where he wants to play next

Posted on 6/18/19 at 9:54 pm to
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
115519 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

It was stupid. It isn’t an apt comparison.

I’m not gonna continue w it.


You seem to be fine with someone choosing the military and the responsibility of being stationed where you are chosen

And yet don’t seem to grasp the same concept with the NBA.
Posted by Obi-Wan Tiger
Fulshear TX
Member since Jan 2004
8105 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

I’m not gonna continue w it.


Posted by ThePTExperience1969
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Apr 2016
13360 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

In the NBA, a first-round pick who shows promise is effectively under the control of the team that drafted him for the first seven seasons of his career. This means that in the most formative years of their professional development, the most talented young men in basketball are given no agency to decide what most of us take for granted: where we will live, work and put down roots in our adult lives.

As Anthony Davis was preparing to become the No. 1 pick in the 2012 NBA draft, I wrote a piece proposing the NBA ditch the draft. Though the idea was presented as a fix for tanking, I also wanted to emphasize the principle of fair labor. I suggested that among the effects stemming from the abolition of the draft "would be a likely uptick in retention. A young player who chooses his destination based on his personal criteria is far more likely to stick around long term."

Freedom of choice for players should be a sacrosanct principle, particularly in a league that claims to value meritocracy. Looking at the roster of NBA owners, it's hard to believe that these billionaire proprietors, many of them self-made, don't subscribe to that virtue. Can you imagine if Memphis Grizzlies owner Robert Pera -- who, upon graduating from UC San Diego with a master's in engineering, chose to take his skills to Apple -- was instead asked by some governing authority in big tech, "Where don't you want to go?" then promptly assigned there?


Does this idiot not know that David Griffin runs the Pelicans as opposed to the dumpster fire that is the Lakers organization? Dude's straight up acting as if Dell Demps is still the GM!
Posted by Melvin
Member since Apr 2011
23535 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

It is sad that conservative don’t have it.
Well what exactly are you advocating for in this situation?
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78004 posts
Posted on 6/19/19 at 12:55 am to
quote:

There is only one google. Or MS. Or top 30 tech companies.


Yeah there are thousands of tech companies

1 Basketball league

The mistake is comparing the teams to the different companies.

There is 1 company with franchises

The Pelicans May have their own owner but they’re nothing without the NBA.

The players can always play in Europe.

But if they want to play in the US we h fortunately have a monopoly with specific rules.

If Google said: we have a job opening in California, and no where else: either you move or you don’t get the job.

This post was edited on 6/19/19 at 12:57 am
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78004 posts
Posted on 6/19/19 at 1:06 am to
There is a downside to sporting Monopolies.

We accept the NFL, NBA NHL and MLB as the only industries in those sports.
Posted by EarlyCuyler3
Appalachia
Member since Nov 2017
27290 posts
Posted on 6/19/19 at 4:42 am to
I always think it's very amusing when staunch, anti-socialists are extremely pro-socialism when it comes to pro sports and athletes. Why should the worst performing and worst managed teams be rewarded with the best future talent? Shouldn't the opposite be true? These sort of people also usually are the ones that are very angry when someone holds out for more money or forces a trade, as if they wouldn't leave their company in a heartbeat for more money or a better job elsewhere if they could.

It's very ironic that the "socialist" euroleagues are completely capitalistic when it comes to athletes. Relegation is an excellent system, although of course its much easier to do in soccer than football.

The draft is a farce. Now Zion may have ended up in a decent spot with NO having new management,but we'll see. Kudos to athletes like Bo and Elways for telling bad organizations to shove it and using their leverage to make better deals elsewhere.
This post was edited on 6/19/19 at 4:43 am
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
11119 posts
Posted on 6/19/19 at 4:51 am to
It's strange when people try to act like a sports league is comprised of separate corporations. Its all the same organization. When you join whatever team you are still governed and monitored by the league offices. Teams are just branches or divisions of the parent organization. None of the teams can exist independently. They are all dependent on each other..
Posted by EarlyCuyler3
Appalachia
Member since Nov 2017
27290 posts
Posted on 6/19/19 at 5:10 am to
Uh, they are all separate organizations. They have individual owners.
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
11119 posts
Posted on 6/19/19 at 5:55 am to
They are shareholders and don't really own anything. They are no different than an owner of a McDonald's. They own a franchise and have rights. But it can be taken from them at any time and they have to operate under strict guidelines. Some McDonald's are in better areas, do much better business, better quality of food and more choices. But at the core, still a McDonald's.
Posted by EarlyCuyler3
Appalachia
Member since Nov 2017
27290 posts
Posted on 6/19/19 at 6:16 am to
Takes a 3/4ths vote from other owners.

But that's kind of beside the point I think. The main point is that other professional sports dont have a draft and function as well or even better than the American pro sports leagues.

American sports leagues have set themselves up as a monopoly that has far too much control over the players that actually make the league what it is.
This post was edited on 6/19/19 at 6:29 am
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
26770 posts
Posted on 6/19/19 at 6:18 am to
quote:

Not something anyone is entitled to.

I'm not saying they're entitled to it. I'm saying the athletes are in literally the only American industry where they have no choice on location, and that would be a drawback, which it undoubtedly is. I don't see what's so controversial about that.
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
26770 posts
Posted on 6/19/19 at 6:18 am to
quote:

If Google said: we have a job opening in California, and no where else: either you move or you don’t get the job.

Google wouldn't say that to their top candidate, realistically.
This post was edited on 6/19/19 at 6:19 am
Posted by BURASBOI
Member since Mar 2007
1827 posts
Posted on 6/19/19 at 7:02 am to
This is why you should not watch ESPN anymore. Unless it's a live game
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78004 posts
Posted on 6/19/19 at 7:45 am to
I thinknits Funny when people co fuse socialism with business practice.

Distributing talent to produce a better product within 1 business has nothing to do with socialism.
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
78004 posts
Posted on 6/19/19 at 7:54 am to
They’re Franchises.

They’re is 1 business and it is the NBA the NFL.

Google doesn’t need to compete with Amazon or Apple to exist. The Saints couldn’t do much without the other 31 teams.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
53426 posts
Posted on 6/19/19 at 8:07 am to
quote:

hear the Big 3 league is looking for talent. He’s free to sign there.

actually he'd need to be 27

quote:

So the NBA needs more teams?

they actually probably do
Posted by colorchangintiger
Dan Carlin
Member since Nov 2005
30979 posts
Posted on 6/19/19 at 8:14 am to
quote:

Can you imagine if Memphis Grizzlies owner Robert Pera -- who, upon graduating from UC San Diego with a master's in engineering, chose to take his skills to Apple -- was instead asked by some governing authority in big tech, "Where don't you want to go?" then promptly assigned there?


Didn't realize the tech sector was a government approved entertainment monopoly where only 30 companies are allowed to operate.
Posted by LB84
Member since May 2016
4342 posts
Posted on 6/19/19 at 8:17 am to
Only thing I would say is a player should be able to do what he wants after 3 years. The team that drafted him should be able to get some extra benefit to resigning him after 3 years but that's it. Controlling a guy for the first 7 years of his development is a bit extreme.

No way in hell should a guy get to pick where he gets to play from the beginning though. The league would fold.
Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
12541 posts
Posted on 6/19/19 at 8:17 am to
are they trying to ruin pro sports? because this is how you ruin pro sports.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram