Started By
Message

re: Do you really believe the SEC would kick LSU out? MSB edition

Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:39 pm to
Posted by tylercsbn9
Cypress, TX
Member since Feb 2004
67376 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

I'm trying to avoid whataboutism, but I don't think any team was as blatant about it as LSU,


I mean bama actually played him
Posted by zzemme
Member since Nov 2008
10551 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:39 pm to
Online the overwhelming majority is definitely a mob mentality against LSU. I’m basing this off X and the Reddit cesspool
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
482343 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:39 pm to
quote:

You implied it by saying LSU should remedy their open roster spots


The implication was the exact opposite. I have been quite blatant with my stance.
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
80419 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

Chambliss in particular isn't really relevant, as he never had any association with any professional team.


There aren’t levels to ineligibility. It’s binary.
Posted by tylercsbn9
Cypress, TX
Member since Feb 2004
67376 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:40 pm to
quote:

Online the overwhelming majority is definitely a mob mentality against LSU. I’m basing this off X and the Reddit cesspool


Lane and LSU are a very easy villain target because they can potentially be a very good team.

If Rutgers was doing this no one would care
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 7:42 pm
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
80419 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:41 pm to
I’ve listened to a dozen national guys today. None are taking it serious.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
482343 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

There aren’t levels to ineligibility. It’s binary.


quote:

The specific nature of their relationship to NFL teams clearly crossed the rubicon for basically everyone other than LSU.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
482343 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

None are taking it serious.


Taking what, specifically, serious?

The situation in general or something specific (like expulsion)?
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
80419 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:41 pm to
I disagree. Ineligible is ineligible.
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
80419 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:42 pm to
Expulsion
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
482343 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:42 pm to
You clearly fall into the "LSU" portion of that statement
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
482343 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:42 pm to
quote:

Expulsion

My initial comment that started that digression was not about expulsion and was about the situation, generally.

Pro-LSU support is in the extreme minority about these 2 guys and our fight with the SEC
Posted by zzemme
Member since Nov 2008
10551 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:43 pm to
It must not be too blatant if no one knows wtf you are trying to say. What is your stance without saying “cut ties”

I’m genuinely asking what you think the solution is
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
80419 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:44 pm to
Not really. I think it’s ridiculous for pro players to come back, in general. RJ Luis should not play for LSU basketball and LSU basketball shouldn’t take him.

These football players do have a case, which is a different discussion. But I’m fine with painting with a broad brush.
Posted by tylercsbn9
Cypress, TX
Member since Feb 2004
67376 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:45 pm to
quote:

Chambliss in particular isn't really relevant, as he never had any association with any professional team.


Because Chambliss got a home judge to rule in his favor and the sec let it go. Surely if he was out of eligibility like the two lsu targets he would have gone pro but the sec let the ruling go and didn’t make a fuss about it
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
482343 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

What is your stance without saying “cut ties”

We need to sign a binding agreement with the SEC/NCAA that these players will never be rostered and are considered ineligible by LSU.
This post was edited on 9/8/26 at 7:47 pm
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
8682 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:48 pm to
quote:

Chambliss in particular isn't really relevant, as he never had any association with any professional team.


But he is playing as ineligible in the eyes of the NCAA, and the SEC follows NCAA rules.
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
80419 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:49 pm to
Make every sec school sign it
Posted by MikeD
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2004
8682 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:50 pm to
quote:

We need to sign a binding agreement with the SEC/NCAA that these players will never be rostered and are considered ineligible by LSU.


Agreed, but apply this standard across the board.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
216752 posts
Posted on 9/8/26 at 7:50 pm to
The biggest mistake the SEC COULD do is expel LSU.
Jump to page
Page First 12 13 14 15 16 ... 23
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 14 of 23Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram