- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

D1 4-year Transition Rule - Conference Tournaments
Posted on 3/8/25 at 11:38 pm
Posted on 3/8/25 at 11:38 pm
How has this dumb rule not gone away yet? Because St. Thomas is in transition mode from D2 to D1, they are ineligible for the NCAA Tournament. They are now playing in the Summitt League Championship game tomorrow which means Omaha, who they will play, now gets the automatic bid regardless of the result tomorrow night
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This post was edited on 3/8/25 at 11:39 pm
Posted on 3/9/25 at 12:04 am to cardswinagain
One of the dumbest rules in college sports and there’s a lot of them. I can understand going D1 to D2 but there’s no advantage going D2 to D1. This has happened a few time the last few years and it’s BS. They need to change this rule.
This post was edited on 3/9/25 at 12:24 am
Posted on 3/9/25 at 5:27 am to cardswinagain
quote:
Because St. Thomas is in transition mode from D2 to D1
The Tommies are in the unprecedented transition from D3 directly to D1. Their goal is apparently to get an invite to the Big East in the future, and they are off to a great start.
Posted on 3/9/25 at 7:43 am to cardswinagain
Agreed it sucks for them and on a side it's crazy they were D3 about 5 years ago and went straight to D1.
This post was edited on 3/9/25 at 7:45 am
Posted on 3/9/25 at 7:59 am to Bernie Bierman
quote:
Their goal is apparently to get an invite to the Big East in the future, and they are off to a great start.
I guess Minnesota does fit in the geographic footprint of the new Big East. Not that geography matters anymore for conferences anyway.
Posted on 3/9/25 at 9:24 am to cardswinagain
If they aren't eligible for the NCAA tournament, don't let them play in the conference tournament. If they're good enough to win the conference tournament, let them into the Big Dance.
This shite isn't that hard.
This shite isn't that hard.
Posted on 3/9/25 at 9:27 am to cardswinagain
Hate this rule, they should allow these teams to compete to make the tournament!
Posted on 3/9/25 at 9:30 am to SWLA92
quote:
One of the dumbest rules in college sports and there’s a lot of them. I can understand going D1 to D2 but there’s no advantage going D2 to D1. This has happened a few time the last few years and it’s BS. They need to change this rule.
The eligibility requirements for D1 and D2 are different. All D1 athletes would be eligible for D2 but not the reverse isn't true.
The rule is to keep teams from winning with players who wouldn't be eligible to play if they weren't on a transitional team.
The eligibility differences aren't just academic. There are differences in age limits and playing timelines. For instance, in D2 football, a player has 10 semesters to play five seasons.
Posted on 3/9/25 at 3:06 pm to New Money
quote:
The eligibility requirements for D1 and D2 are different. All D1 athletes would be eligible for D2 but not the reverse isn't true.
The rule is to keep teams from winning with players who wouldn't be eligible to play if they weren't on a transitional team.
The eligibility differences aren't just academic. There are differences in age limits and playing timelines. For instance, in D2 football, a player has 10 semesters to play five seasons.
None of this justifies the rule.
Posted on 3/9/25 at 3:54 pm to KosmoCramer
quote:
None of this justifies the rule.
I mean if they didn’t like it they could have just stayed D2
Posted on 3/9/25 at 4:03 pm to cardswinagain
They call it the Randy Moss rule
Back when you could transfer to I-AA without sitting out a year, Marshall loaded up on a lot of I-A transfers and then moved up to I-A and dominated. The rule was to prevent gaming the system like that
Back when you could transfer to I-AA without sitting out a year, Marshall loaded up on a lot of I-A transfers and then moved up to I-A and dominated. The rule was to prevent gaming the system like that
Posted on 3/9/25 at 4:11 pm to goldennugget
But since that’s not the case anymore why don’t they adapt?
Posted on 3/9/25 at 4:12 pm to chalmetteowl
That doesn't justify the rule either.
The NCAA can't get out of their own way. They are a relic and will be extinct in the near future.
The NCAA can't get out of their own way. They are a relic and will be extinct in the near future.
Posted on 3/9/25 at 4:20 pm to goldennugget
quote:
Back when you could transfer to I-AA without sitting out a year, Marshall loaded up on a lot of I-A transfers and then moved up to I-A and dominated. The rule was to prevent gaming the system like that
And now that’s how the entire system operates by loading up on transfers. The NCAA is so retarded.
Posted on 3/9/25 at 4:26 pm to cardswinagain
The rules exist to stop the manipulation. Timing your moving up when you know you have a good team so that you can cash in quickly.
FCS and Division 2 had much more lax eligibility standards, so the phase in rules would stop a team from recruiting a bunch of ringers and then moving up and cashing in; they can still recruit ringers and move up, but they can't cash in.
The rules may be obsolete at this point; I'm not sure there are any eligibility standards anymore.
FCS and Division 2 had much more lax eligibility standards, so the phase in rules would stop a team from recruiting a bunch of ringers and then moving up and cashing in; they can still recruit ringers and move up, but they can't cash in.
The rules may be obsolete at this point; I'm not sure there are any eligibility standards anymore.
Posted on 3/9/25 at 5:15 pm to cardswinagain
ncaa is gayer than west coast pole smoker?
Popular
Back to top

8









