- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: CHC Thread | Schwarber Smash | CLE (Bauer) @ CHC (Arrieta)
Posted on 6/18/15 at 3:19 pm to Toula
Posted on 6/18/15 at 3:19 pm to Toula
quote:I just don't see the Cubs making a big trade for a top pitcher this year...not when they can get that done in the winter using just monetary resources instead of giving up players they think can help long term.
I've been team Hamels all year. His contract fits perfectly with our window.
I do think Baez and/or Castro would be the first ones out the door, but the likelihood of them doing that considering the big free agent pitching class for next season seems slim. Just my crap opinion.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 3:20 pm to Toula
Yep
When you start weeding out small market teams and teams lacking top end prospects, you're only left w a few teams imo
Baez isn't Corey seager, but if you sweeten the pot with 2 other top 100 guys, you could be working with something
You see what we got for Samardjiza and then what TB got for price (lol)..granted they are slightly different circumstances, so It's really hard to call. It only takes 1 GM to like a guy though. Amaro is all over the place so who knows what that guy wants to do. The fact that a deal hasn't been done tells me he's asking too much
When you start weeding out small market teams and teams lacking top end prospects, you're only left w a few teams imo
Baez isn't Corey seager, but if you sweeten the pot with 2 other top 100 guys, you could be working with something
You see what we got for Samardjiza and then what TB got for price (lol)..granted they are slightly different circumstances, so It's really hard to call. It only takes 1 GM to like a guy though. Amaro is all over the place so who knows what that guy wants to do. The fact that a deal hasn't been done tells me he's asking too much
Posted on 6/18/15 at 3:22 pm to The Sad Banana
I can't believe us and the Mets haven't reached a deal yet. It's jsut such a good fit. Young bats for young pitching.
Maybe their pitching is a tab better than our bats..? IDK
I think the point here is the top SPs in the market are going to run you a Lester sized contract. Do wew really want another one of those?
No 30 year old SP is going take a 3 to 4 year deal.
I hate trading the prospects too, but that's the cost of doing business.
Maybe their pitching is a tab better than our bats..? IDK
quote:
not when they can get that done in the winter using just monetary resources instead of giving up players they think can help long term.
I think the point here is the top SPs in the market are going to run you a Lester sized contract. Do wew really want another one of those?
No 30 year old SP is going take a 3 to 4 year deal.
I hate trading the prospects too, but that's the cost of doing business.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 3:29 pm to The Sad Banana
You're looking at a dealing a prospect vs signing another FA which will likely cost 80-100mil in extra money(compared to Hamels), and 2-4 years of a bad contract at the end of said pitchers career.
Sounds like a better trade off to me, considering we already know Lester will be an albatross late in his career
Sounds like a better trade off to me, considering we already know Lester will be an albatross late in his career
Posted on 6/18/15 at 3:53 pm to Lester Earl
Hold for this season. No reason to make any big trades as Cub fans aren't clamoring for a division title right now. Everyone knows this team is not there yet and are willing to wait and are having fun watching these kids grow in front of us. Don't trade away the future for short term results (a WC spot this season).
Buy the SP we need in the off-season. In the meantime, scour the earth for some middle relievers. Also, need to start taking some fliers on some pitching prospects. The player pool is built up, time to go heavy on the arms and stock up the system. It only takes one phenom arm to emerge in the next two seasons to fill a rotation hole.
Buy the SP we need in the off-season. In the meantime, scour the earth for some middle relievers. Also, need to start taking some fliers on some pitching prospects. The player pool is built up, time to go heavy on the arms and stock up the system. It only takes one phenom arm to emerge in the next two seasons to fill a rotation hole.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 4:09 pm to SoDakHawk
The Cubs are hot and only getting better, two games out of the WC. STL is reeling and are beat up. Conceivably they are catchable. You can play for now and the future
I don't think you are sacrificing the future by trading what ifs for 4 years of an ace in his prime.
Greinke could opt OUT of a contract already paying him $20m+
he's going to cost a shite ton over his last long term deal
Price has had this date circled for awhile too. This will be his career deal for Scherzer money.
4 years of Hamels in the $20s at the expense of prospects who could or could not turn out, at positions we are set at
7 years of 30+ yo price or Greinke in the $30m range? Tie up near $60m per year fir awhile for 2 pitchers on the wrong side of 30
Interesting scenario
I don't think you are sacrificing the future by trading what ifs for 4 years of an ace in his prime.
Greinke could opt OUT of a contract already paying him $20m+
Price has had this date circled for awhile too. This will be his career deal for Scherzer money.
4 years of Hamels in the $20s at the expense of prospects who could or could not turn out, at positions we are set at
7 years of 30+ yo price or Greinke in the $30m range? Tie up near $60m per year fir awhile for 2 pitchers on the wrong side of 30
Interesting scenario
Posted on 6/18/15 at 4:18 pm to SoDakHawk
that doesn't make a ton of sense, but im not going to start to dissect it
Posted on 6/18/15 at 4:20 pm to GynoSandberg
Heck, I'm not even saying we should break the bank by signing Price or Greinke. In fact, avoid those albatross contracts. There are diamond in the rough pitchers out there for the signing. St. Louis seems to always be able to scrape together a solid rotation. Heck, the Twins have put a decent staff together out of nothing this season. Cubs could do that too.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 4:37 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
that doesn't make a ton of sense, but im not going to start to dissect it
Please do disect. All I am saying is I don't want to trade good prospects away to just make the WC. I'm looking to next season and years down the road where this team will contend for WS titles.
I'd rather we played the season out, maybe make some minor trades to find some middle relief help, and try to sign some SP in the off season. Also, I'm not into overpaying for guys on the flip side of 30. I'd rather spend reasonable money on guys that can be solid rotation guys, not ace money that will bite us on the back end of the contract. Also, start stockpiling every arm you can find in the minor system. Somebody will pan out eventually.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 4:46 pm to SoDakHawk
quote:
All I am saying is I don't want to trade good prospects away to just make the WC. I'm looking to next season and years down the road where this team will contend for WS titles.
well a trade for Hamels wouldnt just be for this year, but through 2018, with a 2019 team option.
Financially, it makes more sense to go with him through his age 34 year, then to pay a 30 or 31 year old pitcher for 6-7 years at $20mil or so, even if it means we give up a prospect or 2.
In an ideal world we wait for our own pitching to come up, but we cant do that if we are competing right now. We need more pitching ASAP to keep up with the rest of the team.
You say we need middle infielders, but we actually have a surplus. Which is why a guy like Baez or even Starlin Castro can be expendable. Trade one of them, and you still have Addison Russell, Ian Happ(our 2015 1st RD pick), Gleyber Torres. We have a nice stockpile of talent there.
quote:
Also, I'm not into overpaying for guys on the flip side of 30. I'd rather spend reasonable money on guys that can be solid rotation guys, not ace money that will bite us on the back end of the contract.
Ace's win championships. Lester is a nice start, and yes, im kind of against signing another aging ace for 6-7 years, which is why Hamels would be perfect to put next to Lester. He's expensive, but he's likely to be really good through the end of his contract.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 4:48 pm to Lester Earl
with all that said, why can't we win now?
trading a prospect or 2 isn't going to hinder our future.
not when we already have young guys in the show like Bryant, Russell, Schwarber, Soler, with young vets like Rizzo and Castro.
You can only play 8 guys.
trading a prospect or 2 isn't going to hinder our future.
not when we already have young guys in the show like Bryant, Russell, Schwarber, Soler, with young vets like Rizzo and Castro.
You can only play 8 guys.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 4:50 pm to Lester Earl
The guy doesn't want to trade for another TOR guy to have a chance to win the World Series?
And it doesn't matter if you're just a Wild Card if you have hitting and horses in the rotation come October.
And it doesn't matter if you're just a Wild Card if you have hitting and horses in the rotation come October.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 5:00 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
The Cubs are hot and only getting better, two games out of the WC
???
Cubs are in the wild card right now.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 5:16 pm to Lester Earl
It depends which prospect ot two. If you can get Philly to part with hamles for baez and mendy or voglebach then sure. but I don't see them doing that. And the idea of just throw another guy in completely misses what the phils want. They want to pay money to buy more prospect return For at or almost major league ready players. So the question would be better asked are you OK with dealing schwarber and mendy for hamels?
When faced with that I'd rather buy a pitcher in the offseaso. It's not my money and I think the cubs are in a place where we are going to have plenty of it.
When faced with that I'd rather buy a pitcher in the offseaso. It's not my money and I think the cubs are in a place where we are going to have plenty of it.
This post was edited on 6/18/15 at 5:19 pm
Posted on 6/18/15 at 5:28 pm to piggidyphish
Joe maddon in any possibility schwarber stays up after this week
"No unless we move to the American league"
"No unless we move to the American league"
Posted on 6/18/15 at 5:29 pm to piggidyphish
The idea of a "throw in" is letting them name whoever they want outside of our big dogs. It's not like we would throw in a Baxter or someone.
I don't think anyone would trade Schwarber in a deal for Hamels or many other players at that
Would a FO hung up on the extra year of control on Bryant then go out and sign two older pitchers to 7 year deals?
I don't think anyone would trade Schwarber in a deal for Hamels or many other players at that
Would a FO hung up on the extra year of control on Bryant then go out and sign two older pitchers to 7 year deals?
Posted on 6/18/15 at 5:32 pm to GynoSandberg
Yea. I think that's exactly what they are going to do. If we don't trade for hamels you don't think ww will sign one of price grinke Zimmerman or cueto?
Ive never thought the bryant decision was driven by money. (Assuming that's the insinuation. If not my fault)
Didn't theo say at the end of last year their plan was to add impact starting pitching over the next 18 months? Ww made a decent push for sheilds and it's not like we aren't getting more money from being competitive and advertising.
Ive never thought the bryant decision was driven by money. (Assuming that's the insinuation. If not my fault)
Didn't theo say at the end of last year their plan was to add impact starting pitching over the next 18 months? Ww made a decent push for sheilds and it's not like we aren't getting more money from being competitive and advertising.
This post was edited on 6/18/15 at 5:38 pm
Posted on 6/18/15 at 5:40 pm to piggidyphish
The Cubs aren't going to deal schwarber and I wouldn't want them to.
If Baez and a few other guys can't work, then move on. Im not that hung up on it.
If Baez and a few other guys can't work, then move on. Im not that hung up on it.
Posted on 6/18/15 at 5:40 pm to piggidyphish
Well the control = mkney long term. Probably won't matter in the long run I guess
Now Zimmerman is an interesting option. Not as many miles and has stuff that should be effective as he ages. Should be a tad cheaper too.
I cannot back a long term deal for Cueto w his injury history. I do think Greinke could be effective well into his 30s. I'd want him over price, who I think relies on velo more. Anyway you cut it you're probably looking at a 4-5 year window for most of those guys. The back end of that potential deal and lesters could be ugly, which is why I'm hung up on Hamels I think
Now Zimmerman is an interesting option. Not as many miles and has stuff that should be effective as he ages. Should be a tad cheaper too.
I cannot back a long term deal for Cueto w his injury history. I do think Greinke could be effective well into his 30s. I'd want him over price, who I think relies on velo more. Anyway you cut it you're probably looking at a 4-5 year window for most of those guys. The back end of that potential deal and lesters could be ugly, which is why I'm hung up on Hamels I think
Popular
Back to top



2




