re: Big 12(texas10) really was hurt by the moves, in behind the scenes posturing

quote:

---

^^lulz

Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.

---

That definitely sounded like Mike Holder OSU's AD. Everything OSU has a taint of the lingering sell of old dirty vagine.

quote:

---

oh wait.

---

yes for one of them

that year the BE was pretty good 12 win Lville and WVU and Rutgers both had 11 wins

while Mizzou went 8-5 but they would have apparently wrecked house if they were in the BE that year

quote:

---

at the top with out a doubt but the middle to bottom tier programs where about the same not much of a diffence b/w KU and Uconn or Pitt and Iowa State

but this nonesne of you thinking the talent on 7 win mizzou teams would win 4 or 5 BE titles straight out right is fricking insane

---

So you forget the other Mizzou teams and just choose this one with a SO first year starting QB to judge that statement.

8-9-10 win Big 12 teams are much better than their counterparts in the Big East. I dont know how or why you try and argue that point.

I have never said thet WVU is "bad" you are a middling team in the Big 12...just like Mizzou was. I love how you ignore the 9-12 win Mizzou teams to fit your argument as well.

Whatever man. Your program can put up or shut up at this point. No more hiding behind the crappy Big East and rattling those sabres. You are going to have to earn it now.

quote:

---

StraightCashHomey21

---

quote:

---

kilo

---

at y'all's argument.

WVU: You've seen some impressive success in a terrible Conference.

Mizzou: You've seen very little success in a good conference and now you're going to an even better conference where you will see less success.

Good luck to y'all too. Believe me, I'll be rooting for Mizzou over all the traditional SEC schools.

quote:

---

middle to bottom tier programs where about the same not much of a diffence b/w KU and Uconn or Pitt and Iowa State

---

Don't you see the problem with this argument? You are comparing two of the 3 worst Big 12 programs to a couple programs that you say are "middle to bottom tier" but have both recently won championships in the Big East. Also your recruiting classes the last two years have been in the mid 40's, behind schools like Tech, Baylor and Oklahoma State.

I think West Virginia has potential in the Big 12 but to think there won't be some sort of adjustment is ridiculous. It's one thing to be one team in a single game, it's different to play them week after week.

quote:

---

quote: Big Kat said A&M will be ahead of OU in a few years and I responded to that, then you jumped in

---

Nope. I said in a few years we would have more money and nicer facilities which could lead to championships.

Now go shove a meth pipe up your arse

quote:

---

Nope. I said in a few years we would have more money and nicer facilities which could lead to championships.
Now go shove a meth pipe up your arse

---

Okay dude. Coming from a state with a significant drug crisis on the border, that comment is funny. I'm done trying to compare OU with A&M, because I really don't care enough.

quote:

---

Do you deny that Oklahoma wanted to be out of the B12 and in the PAC or SEC but was rejected by both because Ok St couldn't come too?

---

According to the article, Texas, Oklahoma, Texas Tech and Oklahoma State were rejected by the Pac 12 because of the LHN.

Look, all I'm saying, is that as a fan of OU, I don't care what conference we're in. If we stay in the Big 12, we'll most likely win the Conference title more years than not, as history suggests. That would be fun to watch as a fan. If we eventually move into the PAC or SEC, so be it. I don't care, because OU will be fine regardless.

quote:

---

Funny. But I was thinking Mexico, hombre

---