Started By
Message

re: Better college RB... Monte ball or Mark Ingram

Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:34 pm to
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47827 posts
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:34 pm to
We don't like Alabama.
Posted by pvilleguru
Member since Jun 2009
60453 posts
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

Ball
Ingram wasnt even the best running back on his team
Why should that matter? Ball didn't have a Trent Richardson to split carries with.
Posted by T1gerWonder
Member since May 2011
4463 posts
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

I find it incredibly predictable thatallthe saints fans are picking Ball...


Fify

LSU fans are mostly saints fans as well
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
34684 posts
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:38 pm to
Ball. But both players are a product of the system. Wisconsin was four yards away from having three 1000 yard rushers in 2010. In the last 10 seasons, Wisconsin's had four different RBs (Anthony Davis, Brian Calhoun, PJ Hill, and John Clay) put up 1500 yard seasons. Wisconsin has always puts up monstrous rushing numbers no matter who was running the ball.
Posted by Gingersnap
Natchitoches
Member since Dec 2012
900 posts
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

I find it incredibly odd that all the LSU fans are picking Ball...


Plus most LSU fans equal Saints fan.

And any saints fan will tell you Ingram is a fricking joke.
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
116225 posts
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:42 pm to
What ever happened to John Clay? That dude was an animal
Posted by SprintFun
Columbus, OH
Member since Dec 2007
45842 posts
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

Plus most LSU fans equal Saints fan.



quote:

Better college RB... Monte ball or Mark Ingram


Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
19353 posts
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:43 pm to
quote:

Ball. But both players are a product of the system. Wisconsin was four yards away from having three 1000 yard rushers in 2010. In the last 10 seasons, Wisconsin's had four different RBs (Anthony Davis, Brian Calhoun, PJ Hill, and John Clay) put up 1500 yard seasons. Wisconsin has always puts up monstrous rushing numbers no matter who was running the ball.


None of them have 82 touchdowns in their career
Posted by memphstigers23
Fenway Pahk
Member since Mar 2012
10278 posts
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:44 pm to
Ball by a mile.
Posted by tgr4ever
Gwinnett, baw
Member since Jul 2011
16214 posts
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:45 pm to
Ingram
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
478293 posts
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:45 pm to
quote:

None of them have 82 touchdowns in their career

doesn't that just mean that he played more games, most likely?

plus he got a year of russell wilson at QB
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
19353 posts
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

doesn't that just mean that he played more games, most likely?


There have been hundreds of 4 year starting runningbacks. Ball barely played as a freshman(4 tds)
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
478293 posts
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:49 pm to
3+ years starting on a running system team with an expanded schedule (12 games + CCG + bowl games)
Posted by ToesOnTheNose213
The present
Member since Oct 2007
2028 posts
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:51 pm to
Ball. Heck, Gerhart was a better college RB than Ingram.
Posted by tgr4ever
Gwinnett, baw
Member since Jul 2011
16214 posts
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:53 pm to
quote:

Gerhart
Got robbed big time
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
478293 posts
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:54 pm to
colt mccoy got robbed
Posted by VerlanderBEAST
Member since Dec 2011
19353 posts
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:56 pm to
quote:

3+ years starting on a running system team with an expanded schedule (12 games + CCG + bowl games)


Ball has 900 career carries I think its safe to say MANY MANY runningbacks have had more and don't have half as many tds
Posted by Gingersnap
Natchitoches
Member since Dec 2012
900 posts
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

Better college RB... Monte ball or Mark Ingram


It doesn't matter Bro Beans, distaste for him in Nola will cloud their judgement.

It's Ball anyway, better stats and like someone else said Ingram wasn't even the best back on his team.
Posted by Cecil D Diesel
Shaolin
Member since Mar 2011
9269 posts
Posted on 1/1/13 at 7:00 pm to

Monte ball
Posted by RandySavage
9 Time Natty Winner
Member since May 2012
35642 posts
Posted on 1/1/13 at 7:06 pm to
Ball and it's not really close.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram