- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:37 pm to bigt41
quote:Why should that matter? Ball didn't have a Trent Richardson to split carries with.
Ball
Ingram wasnt even the best running back on his team
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:38 pm to SprintFun
quote:
I find it incredibly predictable thatallthe saints fans are picking Ball...
Fify
LSU fans are mostly saints fans as well
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:38 pm to theebuckeyenut
Ball. But both players are a product of the system. Wisconsin was four yards away from having three 1000 yard rushers in 2010. In the last 10 seasons, Wisconsin's had four different RBs (Anthony Davis, Brian Calhoun, PJ Hill, and John Clay) put up 1500 yard seasons. Wisconsin has always puts up monstrous rushing numbers no matter who was running the ball.
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:38 pm to SprintFun
quote:
I find it incredibly odd that all the LSU fans are picking Ball...
Plus most LSU fans equal Saints fan.
And any saints fan will tell you Ingram is a fricking joke.
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:42 pm to Bench McElroy
What ever happened to John Clay? That dude was an animal
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:42 pm to Gingersnap
quote:
Plus most LSU fans equal Saints fan.
quote:
Better college RB... Monte ball or Mark Ingram
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:43 pm to Bench McElroy
quote:
Ball. But both players are a product of the system. Wisconsin was four yards away from having three 1000 yard rushers in 2010. In the last 10 seasons, Wisconsin's had four different RBs (Anthony Davis, Brian Calhoun, PJ Hill, and John Clay) put up 1500 yard seasons. Wisconsin has always puts up monstrous rushing numbers no matter who was running the ball.
None of them have 82 touchdowns in their career
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:45 pm to VerlanderBEAST
quote:
None of them have 82 touchdowns in their career
doesn't that just mean that he played more games, most likely?
plus he got a year of russell wilson at QB
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
doesn't that just mean that he played more games, most likely?
There have been hundreds of 4 year starting runningbacks. Ball barely played as a freshman(4 tds)
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:49 pm to VerlanderBEAST
3+ years starting on a running system team with an expanded schedule (12 games + CCG + bowl games)
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:51 pm to theebuckeyenut
Ball. Heck, Gerhart was a better college RB than Ingram.
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:53 pm to ToesOnTheNose213
quote:Got robbed big time
Gerhart
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
3+ years starting on a running system team with an expanded schedule (12 games + CCG + bowl games)
Ball has 900 career carries I think its safe to say MANY MANY runningbacks have had more and don't have half as many tds
Posted on 1/1/13 at 6:57 pm to SprintFun
quote:
Better college RB... Monte ball or Mark Ingram
It doesn't matter Bro Beans, distaste for him in Nola will cloud their judgement.
It's Ball anyway, better stats and like someone else said Ingram wasn't even the best back on his team.
Posted on 1/1/13 at 7:06 pm to SprintFun
Ball and it's not really close.
Popular
Back to top



0







