Started By
Message

re: As a tiger fan, that targeting call was awful

Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:14 pm to
Posted by TallMan
Member since Jul 2014
360 posts
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:14 pm to
Bad rule that he gets ejected for it, but it's 100% the correct call by rule. They need to have an equivalent of soccer's yellow cards for those types of targeting that aren't malicious at all.
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47824 posts
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:14 pm to
I know by rule it’s correct, the rule sucks and needs heavy modification. The ejection thing is absurd. Changes entire football games.
Posted by Riseupfromtherubble
You'll Never Walk Alone
Member since Jun 2011
38378 posts
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:15 pm to
quote:

Wanting to protect player safety and prohibit hits using the crown of the head is fine.

The automatic DQ (at least for the 1st offense) needs to go.



Yep. As it stands right now the Stephens hit was the most dangerous one in the game, and it rightly wasn’t called. I hate looking for a flag when someone gets hit hard
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72129 posts
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:15 pm to
I mean, I understand the rule, but dammit, I hate that that player was ejected.
Posted by KillerNut9
Pearl Jam
Member since Dec 2007
33508 posts
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:16 pm to
There needs to be 2 levels. One with clear intent that results in an ejection. One that just happened because how fast the game is with no ejection.

The Oklahoma ejection against LSU was clear as day warranted.
Posted by Shooter
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
6377 posts
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:17 pm to
He's got the shoulder pads for targeting. frick that dude!
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
95375 posts
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:17 pm to
That was a clear call, and what the penalty is meant for. He put his head down, stared at the turf, and jumped at the ball carrier

That isn’t an example of a bad targeting call. Actually,what he did was spearing and had been a penalty since the 1960s
Posted by Billy Mays
Member since Jan 2009
25283 posts
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:17 pm to
Rules are rules.

If you don’t like the rules in place, that’s a different discussion.

The call wasn’t “awful” if you go strictly by the rulebook.
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
25945 posts
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:17 pm to
The purpose of the rule is to teach kids not to tackle with their head down. It needs to be harsh. We don’t need them paralyzing themselves cause they don’t know how to tackle correctly.
Posted by Eighteen
Member since Dec 2006
33881 posts
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:18 pm to
There just needs to be malicious intent for the ejection part. Shameful to kick a kid off the field in a championship game
Posted by A Menace to Sobriety
Member since Jun 2018
29108 posts
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:19 pm to
That is 100% the exact definition of targeting. OP is a mother fricking retard.
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47824 posts
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:19 pm to
frick that noise

Punish it harshly if there is clear intent to target; don’t eject a player for a split second mistake.

There is a night and day difference between that call and the targeting call against Oklahoma, for example.
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36660 posts
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:27 pm to
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84991 posts
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:33 pm to
Except for it being textbook launching and lowering the head, sure.

Posted by VABuckeye
Naples, FL
Member since Dec 2007
35563 posts
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:33 pm to
quote:

Changes entire football games.


Believe me. We know.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84991 posts
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:34 pm to
quote:

Punish it harshly if there is clear intent to target; don’t eject a player for a split second mistake.


Fine. Change the ejection call. I'm fine with that, but that was absolutely targeting.
Posted by VABuckeye
Naples, FL
Member since Dec 2007
35563 posts
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:35 pm to
It was absolutely helmet to helmet contact. You can’t presume to know intent when a kid is reacting.
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35536 posts
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:36 pm to
Basically you can't lower your head except for a RB, doesn't matter what your head hits.
Posted by TotesMcGotes
New York, New York
Member since Mar 2009
27875 posts
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:37 pm to
They should treat targeting like the NBA treats flagrants. Two different types: one egregious and an automatic ejection, one just the penalty.
Posted by stonedbegonias
Member since Jan 2010
11581 posts
Posted on 1/13/20 at 10:41 pm to
It’s meant to protect the defender as much as the offensive player. That’s how you break your neck, gotta teach the youngins.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram