- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Alabama quarterbacks in the NFL
Posted on 12/17/15 at 11:43 am to genro
Posted on 12/17/15 at 11:43 am to genro
quote:
Because an irrational LSU dislike of Bama is the only explanation for your unreasonable shite slinging
Im shite slinging??? Saying that it isnt an anomaly is shite slinging?
quote:
They are better quarterbacks than most other college quarterbacks.
That doesnt really mean anything. There are like 120 college teams. there are 32 Nfl teams. There are probably 5 jobs available every year. You have to be waaayyy better to be considered NFL talent. List off all of the SEC QBs to have wins in since 87. Then show me where Croyle, McElroy, AJ rank against those. Because Croyle having less wins than Jason Campbell is not an anomaly.
This post was edited on 12/17/15 at 11:44 am
1
Posted on 12/17/15 at 11:46 am to Hester Carries
quote:Now you're starting to get it.
There are like 120 college teams. there are 32 Nfl teams. There are probably 5 jobs available every year.
quote:Croyle is literally one guy. Jason Campbell is literally one guy. Think of the numbers you just brought up. The fact that we haven't been lucky enough to get just one guy, which is what most of the others on the list (AT BEST) is pretty meaningless.
Because Croyle having less wins than Jason Campbell is not an anomaly.
I mean seriously, the Chiefs could've intercepted some passes and ran a kick back, not even won because of Brodie, and this thread and stat doesn't exist. If Brodie went to the Packers and backed up Rodgers this thread doesn't exist. It's just a stupid crapshoot.
This post was edited on 12/17/15 at 11:47 am
Posted on 12/17/15 at 11:47 am to genro
quote:
The fact that we haven't been lucky enough to get just one guy, which is what most of the others on the list (AT BEST) is pretty meaningless.
Its not about luck. ALABAMA DOES NOT DEVELOP QBS WORTHY OF WINNING NFL GAMES.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 11:48 am to Hester Carries
quote:NO ONE DOES
ALABAMA DOES NOT DEVELOP QBS WORTHY OF WINNING NFL GAMES.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 11:49 am to genro
quote:
If Brodie went to the Packers and backed up Rodgers this thread doesn't exist.
Oh so Brodie would just have won that game no questions asked??? I mean frick, Flynn threw 2 less TD in one game than Brodie did in his ENTIRE CAREER.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 11:50 am to genro
quote:
NO ONE DOES
lolwut
Posted on 12/17/15 at 11:52 am to Hester Carries
What program is consistently churning out NFL qb's?
The only one I can really think of would be early 2000s USCw and that's over now.
The rest literally just have one guy or so, at best. OM has one guy, do you think they're not on this list because OM is so much better at developing qb's than Bama or do you think it's just because Eli Manning was born with talent?
The only one I can really think of would be early 2000s USCw and that's over now.
The rest literally just have one guy or so, at best. OM has one guy, do you think they're not on this list because OM is so much better at developing qb's than Bama or do you think it's just because Eli Manning was born with talent?
This post was edited on 12/17/15 at 11:52 am
Posted on 12/17/15 at 11:54 am to genro
quote:
What program is consistently churning out NFL qb's?
They dont have to do it consistently. Just do it...sometimes. My point is that in the time frame in question there have been no Bama QBs where an objective person would say "Well that guy should have definitely won at least one game."
Posted on 12/17/15 at 11:55 am to Hester Carries
quote:
They dont have to do it consistently. Just do it...sometimes.
If it only happens once in a blue moon, maybe it's not about development. Maybe it's about talent, maybe it's a total crapshoot. Ya think?
quote:McElroy DID win a game.
"Well that guy should have definitely won at least one game."
Posted on 12/17/15 at 12:02 pm to WalkingTurtles
quote:
Also LSU has the greatest backup QB of all time Matt Flynn!!!
David Woodley says hello
Posted on 12/17/15 at 12:06 pm to ReauxlTide222
as a college football fan - I would trade every sec title and national title they have for any nfl success of our former qb's.....
Posted on 12/17/15 at 12:15 pm to Will Munny
quote:
Jeremy Hill started 13
Nope, Bernard has been the starter since week 2.
Hill got benched for fumbles and never recovered the starting job.
Edit: I've followed the situation closely, because Hill was my first rounder in two fantasy leagues.
This post was edited on 12/17/15 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 12/17/15 at 12:34 pm to VaBamaMan
quote:
Nope, Bernard has been the starter since week 2.
Hill got benched for fumbles and never recovered the starting job.
Edit: I've followed the situation closely, because Hill was my first rounder in two fantasy leagues.
I don't follow the Bengals that closely so I had to look it up, but nfl.com says Hill started 13 games, Bernard started zero
Hill
Bernard
Posted on 12/17/15 at 12:38 pm to choupiquesushi
quote:
as a college football fan - I would trade every sec title and national title they have for any nfl success of our former qb's.....
Posted on 12/17/15 at 12:39 pm to Chadaristic
quote:
quote:
as a college football fan - I would trade every sec title and national title they have for any nfl success of our former qb's.....
wtf does NFL success of QB's have to do with college success?
Posted on 12/17/15 at 12:40 pm to choupiquesushi
nvmd
This post was edited on 12/17/15 at 12:41 pm
Posted on 12/17/15 at 12:52 pm to Will Munny
quote:
I don't follow the Bengals that closely so I had to look it up, but nfl.com says Hill started 13 games, Bernard started zero
Hill
Bernard
Hill's listed atop the Bengals depth chart. He also has more carries but Benard's the leading rusher.
MI and Lacy are still better than RB LSU has right now in the NFL.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:08 pm to VaBamaMan
quote:How do you determine who the starting RB is? Who gets the first carry? Who gets the first touch? Who gets the first snap? Who gets the most carries?
Nope, Bernard has been the starter since week 2.
Hill got benched for fumbles and never recovered the starting job.
Edit: I've followed the situation closely, because Hill was my first rounder in two fantasy leagues.
ETA: I just went and checked. Hill got the first touch in 12 of 13 games. No way to tell who was lined up at RB for the first play though.
This post was edited on 12/17/15 at 1:16 pm
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:11 pm to StrongBackWeakMind
I remember we had a game in 2009 where Ingram was officially recorded as the starting quarterback because our first play was from wildcat.
Posted on 12/17/15 at 1:18 pm to StrongBackWeakMind
quote:
How do you determine who the starting RB is? Who gets the first carry? Who gets the first touch? Who gets the first snap? Who gets the most carries?
This is a good question.
Hill was the starter put of camp, and Lewis never publicly said Bernard was the starter. But Bernard gets double the snaps Hill does, and is usually on the field before Hill.
Maybe it goes by the official team chart, which Lewis never changed.
Page 3 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News