Started By
Message

re: 2022 Formula 1 Season Thread

Posted on 9/13/22 at 6:34 pm to
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 6:34 pm to
They need to bring refueling back.

Added a lot of strategy.
Posted by TexasTiger33
United States of America
Member since Feb 2022
16128 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 6:49 pm to
quote:

They need to bring refueling back.


And V10s. And pit girls. And different tire manufacturers.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112846 posts
Posted on 9/13/22 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

Once you red flag and let drivers out they can go pee and that messes up post race weigh ins.
What does this even mean? Red flags exist right now in F1 today, so how is this an argument against the red flags in an end of race scenario?
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
78354 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 6:23 am to
quote:

They need to bring refueling back.

Added a lot of strategy.


Agreed. With the tire strategy and fuel loads it could open us up for more actual racing instead of hill climb type lap monitoring.
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
54442 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 6:45 am to
Not happening.
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
16879 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 6:53 am to
quote:

And V10s. And pit girls
This solves all problems for me. Endorse
Posted by EarlyCuyler3
Appalachia
Member since Nov 2017
27290 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 12:14 pm to
It's a safety decision though, is it not? I don't see them rolling back any of the stuff mentioned here.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
78354 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 12:31 pm to
Safety to a large extent. Also money.

This is the new penny pinching F1 so the financials of refueling systems likely will keep them prohibited for a while.
This post was edited on 9/14/22 at 12:42 pm
Posted by EarlyCuyler3
Appalachia
Member since Nov 2017
27290 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 12:41 pm to
I had to look it up, didn't realize F1 used gas. I was thinking more of the methanol fires that were terrifying.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
78354 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 12:43 pm to
They use some strange stuff. The rules that govern the fuel are extensive and each engine manufacturer develops their own fuel.

Shell has a lot of experience in biofuels and that is rumored to have given an edge to Ferrari in the fuel regs.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

It's a safety decision though, is it not? I don't see them rolling back any of the stuff mentioned here.



Indycars fuel just fine.
Posted by EarlyCuyler3
Appalachia
Member since Nov 2017
27290 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

Indycars fuel just fine.


Does the stacking play into it though? They don't do that in Indy.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
78354 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 1:24 pm to
No one wants another bbq Verstappen



Part of the issue is F1 pressurized their fueling systems, or at least force loaded. Indy did the same and had a bunch of invisible fires.

I definitely think there are options now to make refueling safe, but F1 will find a way to make it expensive.
This post was edited on 9/14/22 at 1:28 pm
Posted by TouchedTheAxeIn82
near the Apple spaceship
Member since Nov 2012
7369 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 1:57 pm to
Yeah the problem is that F1 insists on really fast pit stops, so to keep up with the three guys per corner tire changing, they need to do pressurized refueling. If they would go to gravity-fed refueling it would be safer. I don't see any reason for 3-sec pit stops except to say "look how fast we are compared to other race series!"

Also, IndyCar fuel is safer than F1. It used to be methanol, now it's E85, and I think next year they are going to 100% ethanol*. An alcohol-based fire is much easier to extinguish, just pour water on it. At every IndyCar refueling stop, when the hose it pulled out someone squirts water at the car to prevent any spilled fuel from igniting.



*They're going to have to protect their refueling trucks between races from robbers.
Posted by TouchedTheAxeIn82
near the Apple spaceship
Member since Nov 2012
7369 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 2:07 pm to
Alex Palou has settled his dispute with Chip Ganassi. Palou will race for Ganassi in IndyCar next year, while being free to test for McLaren in F1.

McLaren is already putting him to work. Palou and Pato O'Ward are in Barthelona this week testing last year's McLaren. The tweet only mentions Palou and O'Ward, but news reports say Colton Herta will also test this week.

https://twitter.com/McLarenF1/status/1570057471141773313

McLaren seems serious about eventually bringing an IndyCar driver over if a seat opens up in the next couple of years. 2021 IndyCar champion Palou has enough points for a superlicense. My understanding is that O'Ward had to finish 4th or higher this year to get enough superlicense points, but he finished 7th in the championship, so I don't think he has the points. Colton Herta also doesn't have enough points. The buzz is that AlphaTauri will sign Herta if he can get an exception to the points requirement, but so far it doesn't seem like the FIA is going to budge on that.
This post was edited on 9/14/22 at 2:18 pm
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 2:14 pm to
quote:

Yeah the problem is that F1 insists on really fast pit stops, so to keep up with the three guys per corner tire changing,


One guy per corner should be plenty. Frankly it's ridiculous that they need like 15 guys to do a pitstop.

Gravity fueling and two tire changers. Save on the budget.
This post was edited on 9/14/22 at 2:15 pm
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
16879 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 3:44 pm to
Endurance series forbid touching the car until the fueling is complete. This is the safest but F1 would never go for it. However it's done safely, I would love to see cars running light fuel and blasting out front trying to do the fuel undercut. Make those engineers earn their money.
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 4:59 pm to
I'm sure there are things they can do with the electronics and fuel nozzle to prevent the car from moving if it's still engaged. (Actually it seems like they already do this. Indy?)

Anyway, make the tire change take longer than the fueling and that would remove most of the issues that they have had in the past.

But yes, some dudes on low fuel blasting away at the start while the tankers run a different strat is interesting.

Ferrari (and Haas) would be so fricked...
Posted by lsulaker
BR
Member since Jan 2009
1475 posts
Posted on 9/14/22 at 8:51 pm to
I would love to see how all these Indy guys do in F1. I think they would all surprise people.
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
16879 posts
Posted on 9/15/22 at 7:08 am to
quote:

Actually it seems like they already do this. Indy?)
I'm not sure about now but I've seen plenty of clips of indy cars blasting away from the pits and dragging half the fueling rig with them until the nozzle shears off. Maybe they've addressed this by now though
Jump to page
Page First 532 533 534 535 536 ... 628
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 534 of 628Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram