- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 11/29 CFB Playoff Rankings | 1. Alabama 2. tOSU 3. Clemson 4. Washington
Posted on 11/29/16 at 6:36 pm to TH03
Posted on 11/29/16 at 6:36 pm to TH03
It is pretty amazing how many retards there are on this board the keep screaming about conference championships when they have cleary stated multiple times that they only serve as tie breakers.
Ohio State played a brutal schedule this year and are getting rewarded for it like the committee has said teams would. It is really not that hard to understand.
Ohio State played a brutal schedule this year and are getting rewarded for it like the committee has said teams would. It is really not that hard to understand.
3
Posted on 11/29/16 at 6:36 pm to TH03
quote:
Tom VanHaaren ?@TomVH 2m2 minutes ago
Judging by what Hocutt is saying, you get the sense he's prepping you for Michigan's potential bump up.
Posted on 11/29/16 at 6:36 pm to ballscaster
Well you people should take a look at my posting history. I basically said exactly what people are saying now about the mandate for the last week in probably 50 different threads. OSU is a lock.
My only concern today was they would drop Nebraska (which they did) add Pitt and Iowa (only added Pitt so didn't give PSU a 2nd top 25 win).
My only concern today was they would drop Nebraska (which they did) add Pitt and Iowa (only added Pitt so didn't give PSU a 2nd top 25 win).
Posted on 11/29/16 at 6:37 pm to Woopigsooie20
If one of them wins it all, it'll look like the committee did their job.
How bad would the melt be if we get a rematch of The Game for the NC.
How bad would the melt be if we get a rematch of The Game for the NC.
Posted on 11/29/16 at 6:37 pm to TH03
quote:...over the course of 12 or 13 games, not just one.
We need to get you nerds out of football. Determine it on the field.
Posted on 11/29/16 at 6:37 pm to bucknut15
quote:OSU and Michigan would have likely gone undefeated with PSU's schedule.
Ohio State played a brutal schedule this year and are getting rewarded for it like the committee has said teams would.
Playing OSU at night in Happy Valley is a huge advantage that should be taken into account.
Posted on 11/29/16 at 6:38 pm to Prowler888
quote:
With a Washington and Clemson loss this weekend, we could possibly see 3 Big 10 schools in the playoffs. #2 Ohio State #5 Michigan #6 Wisconsin/ #7 Penn St. Winner
and then Colorado rightfully freaks out. 2 loss pac 12 champion is behind 3 big ten teams?
Posted on 11/29/16 at 6:38 pm to ballscaster
Same record, 43 point win. Pretty clear to me. Leave the other stats for nerds
Posted on 11/29/16 at 6:38 pm to Prowler888
quote:
With a Washington and Clemson loss this weekend, we could possibly see 3 Big 10 schools in the playoffs.
#2 Ohio State
#5 Michigan
#6 Wisconsin/ #7 Penn St. Winner
I mean, seems likely if that scenario plays out.
If Washington loses and Wisconsin wins, does Wisconsin jump Michigan? Wisconsin and Michigan have to have similar strength of schedules, I would imagine. Wisconsin would have one more win. If you're looking at "tie-breakers," Michigan won the head-to-head, but Wisconsin would be a conference champion.
Would be close. I think they'd jump Wisconsin ahead.
Posted on 11/29/16 at 6:39 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
quote:
and then Colorado rightfully freaks out. 2 loss pac 12 champion is behind 3 big ten teams?
Well they would have Michigan 4, and they did beat colorado head to head
Posted on 11/29/16 at 6:40 pm to Buckeye06
quote:
Well they would have Michigan 4, and they did beat colorado head to head
Head-to-head is only one of the "tie-breakers." Another would be conference championships, which Colorado would have and Michigan wouldn't.
But, I do agree, Michigan would be ahead of Colorado.
This post was edited on 11/29/16 at 6:40 pm
Posted on 11/29/16 at 6:40 pm to bucknut15
quote:
It is pretty amazing how many retards there are on this board
Louisiana is 49th ranked in literacy, its not that amazing
Posted on 11/29/16 at 6:40 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
quote:...two of whom have better records and tougher schedules, one of whom has a half game disadvantage, tougher schedule, and a head to head win over Colorado.
and then Colorado rightfully freaks out. 2 loss pac 12 champion is behind 3 big ten teams?
Buffs won't have much of an argument.
This post was edited on 11/29/16 at 6:42 pm
Posted on 11/29/16 at 6:40 pm to rockchlkjayhku11
quote:
rightfully
Don't get carried away.
Posted on 11/29/16 at 6:40 pm to TH03
quote:You just aren't informed enough to discuss this with me. Sorry.
Same record, 43 point win. Pretty clear to me. Leave the other stats for nerds
Posted on 11/29/16 at 6:41 pm to BayouBengals03
quote:Wisconsin. I'd bet on it.
If Washington loses and Wisconsin wins, does Wisconsin jump Michigan? Wisconsin and Michigan have to have similar strength of schedules, I would imagine. Wisconsin would have one more win. If you're looking at "tie-breakers," Michigan won the head-to-head, but Wisconsin would be a conference champion.
Would be close. I think they'd jump Wisconsin ahead.
Posted on 11/29/16 at 6:42 pm to hendersonshands
So the different scenarios look like they'll play out like this (with all the usual caveats about huge blowouts or something similar):
Clemson and Washington win this weekend:
1) Alabama
2) Ohio State
3) Clemson
4) Washington
Washington loses. Clemson wins. Wisconsin wins:
1) Alabama
2) Ohio State
3) Clemson
4) Wisconsin
Washington wins. Clemson loses. Wisconsin wins:
1) Alabama
2) Ohio State
3) Washington
4) Wisconsin
The chaos scenario...Washington loses. Clemson loses. Penn State wins:
1) Alabama
2) Ohio State
3) Colorado?
4) Michigan? Penn State?
That's the one I can't figure out. I think Michigan is pretty close to being locked out in just about any scenario. Wisconsin would definitely jump them, as would most Colorado most likely. I don't know what they'd do with Penn State in that scenario.
Clemson and Washington win this weekend:
1) Alabama
2) Ohio State
3) Clemson
4) Washington
Washington loses. Clemson wins. Wisconsin wins:
1) Alabama
2) Ohio State
3) Clemson
4) Wisconsin
Washington wins. Clemson loses. Wisconsin wins:
1) Alabama
2) Ohio State
3) Washington
4) Wisconsin
The chaos scenario...Washington loses. Clemson loses. Penn State wins:
1) Alabama
2) Ohio State
3) Colorado?
4) Michigan? Penn State?
That's the one I can't figure out. I think Michigan is pretty close to being locked out in just about any scenario. Wisconsin would definitely jump them, as would most Colorado most likely. I don't know what they'd do with Penn State in that scenario.
Posted on 11/29/16 at 6:43 pm to ballscaster
So why aren't you on the committee, nerd?
Posted on 11/29/16 at 6:43 pm to Buckeye06
quote:
Well they would have Michigan 4, and they did beat colorado head to head
the irony is dripping
Posted on 11/29/16 at 6:43 pm to AbuTheMonkey
Ohio State is not going to keep the #2 spot, under most situations
they are a lock for top 4, but they will not stay #2
they are a lock for top 4, but they will not stay #2
Page 6 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News