Started By
Message

Soon to be in the housing market. A tough pill to swallow.

Posted on 7/4/20 at 10:51 pm
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
48942 posts
Posted on 7/4/20 at 10:51 pm
Love my house. Not a terrible school district, but I know a move is coming in the next couple of years.

I need a pep talk in justifying why I should pay at least double my current house value just for a school district. Most of the times these houses are about same square footage and lack yards.

Seriously considered getting better bang for buck somewhere rural and commuting to private school.

Thoughts appreciated.

Maybe I'm just a cheap bastard
Posted by lsuconnman
Baton rouge
Member since Feb 2007
2659 posts
Posted on 7/4/20 at 11:22 pm to
We have another concurrent thread discussing the thrill of children. I think your input would be priceless.
Posted by meeple
Carcassonne
Member since May 2011
9357 posts
Posted on 7/5/20 at 4:30 am to
Following. Our timetable for this is 1 year.
Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 7/5/20 at 5:47 am to
As someone who did what you are considering I advise against it, the kids will be gone sooner than you think and you will be moving again because the reason you chose to live there is gone.





Posted by hungryone
river parishes
Member since Sep 2010
11987 posts
Posted on 7/5/20 at 6:44 am to
quote:

I need a pep talk in justifying why I should pay at least double my current house value just for a school district. Most of the times these houses are about same square footage and lack yards.

Seriously considered getting better bang for buck somewhere rural and commuting to private school.


Rural living means you’re commuting for EVERYthing. Is a yard more important than the time you will spend driving back and forth for......Decent restaurants, anything more than basic shopping, work, socializing with friends, entertainment, etc.
Posted by OleWarSkuleAlum
Huntsville, AL
Member since Dec 2013
10293 posts
Posted on 7/5/20 at 7:24 am to
Move to Madison AL
Posted by SaintTiger80
Member since Feb 2020
449 posts
Posted on 7/5/20 at 8:32 am to
Why can’t your kids go to your current school district? What does “not terrible” mean?
This post was edited on 7/5/20 at 8:34 am
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
48942 posts
Posted on 7/5/20 at 9:36 am to
quote:

Why can’t your kids go to your current school district? What does “not terrible” mean?


They could. It's not terrible meaning not bad. I'd be okay with it.
Posted by SaintTiger80
Member since Feb 2020
449 posts
Posted on 7/5/20 at 10:10 am to
Ok then does that not answer your question? Why would spend so much more money on a “better” education when the current one meets your expectations?

Also, the money saved in not moving could be used to pay for more extracurriculars for your kids.
Posted by AUjim
America
Member since Dec 2012
3662 posts
Posted on 7/5/20 at 10:31 am to
Property/housing value appreciation > property/housing value stagnation
Posted by SpanishFortTiger
Spanish Fort, Alabama
Member since Dec 2014
1662 posts
Posted on 7/5/20 at 10:46 am to
I feel other factors are not being mentioned. No middle ground on school districts? How much is private?
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
17980 posts
Posted on 7/5/20 at 11:10 am to
quote:

need a pep talk in justifying why I should pay at least double my current house value just for a school district.


You shouldn't if your current one is safe.

A child's education depends on the parents way more than anything else. Just mediocre teachers are good enough if the child is happy and the parents are engaged.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19475 posts
Posted on 7/5/20 at 11:12 am to
One possibility for "not terrible" school is to pay for an academically rigorous after school program to augment what the public schools lack.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
48942 posts
Posted on 7/5/20 at 11:15 am to
quote:

I feel other factors are not being mentioned.


Oh yeah. A wife. THE factor

quote:

No middle ground on school districts? How much is private?



Private would essentially be what I'm already paying in daycare costs
This post was edited on 7/5/20 at 11:16 am
Posted by white perch
the bright, happy side of hell
Member since Apr 2012
7131 posts
Posted on 7/5/20 at 11:20 am to
Just move to the north shore
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
18384 posts
Posted on 7/5/20 at 1:41 pm to
It would help (especially those of us in Alabama) if you told us where you currently live versus what you're looking at.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
48942 posts
Posted on 7/5/20 at 1:52 pm to
Let's do this. Rank the following school districts

Hoover
Vestavia
Mountain Brook
Thompson (Alabaster)
Chelsea
Pelham
Oak Mountain
Posted by SECdragonmaster
Order of the Dragons
Member since Dec 2013
16204 posts
Posted on 7/5/20 at 2:09 pm to
It’s harder to rank school districts than you think.

Because the higher income districts (Mountain Brook and Vestavia) have much more involved parents and resources than the others. It does not mean your child will do better there - just that they have more resources if they are needed as less school funding is diverted to other areas of need.

For instance, Hoover has a very large business tax base to draw from. However, they spend so much money on ESL (English as a second language) services and behavioral services that less is available for the general curriculum.

The best school system is the best one for THAT particular family moving there. Do you have kids that are high achievers? Kids with Autism Spectrum? Kids with general learning disabilities? That can change the formula.


If you ask me to generally rank them:

MB
VH
Hoover
Chelsea

Thompson
Oak Mountain

Pelham
Posted by JayDeerTay84
Texas
Member since May 2013
9847 posts
Posted on 7/5/20 at 2:09 pm to
Homeschool.
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
18384 posts
Posted on 7/5/20 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

Let's do this. Rank the following school districts

Hoover
Vestavia
Mountain Brook
Thompson (Alabaster)
Chelsea
Pelham
Oak Mountain



Awesome. I have 14 years teaching experience in the Over the Mountain area, and I know plenty of teachers in most of those schools.

My personal rankings and why:

1. Vestavia

Wealthy, top-notch school system. Neighborhood feel. Enough wealth disparity though to be affordable. You need about $300k just to get in, and that's not going to get you much. Housing market is hot right now. $400k would be a good price. This school system gives your kids the chance to attend any school in the country if they are successful. Plenty of extracurricular opportunities.

2. Mountain Brook

It's actually a better school system than Vestavia, but I put it at #2 because you're not getting in if you're posting a thread about being worried about money. A friend of mine's sister is an internal medicine physician and her husband is a successful lawyer. They just bought a fixer upper for $490k. There are million dollar homes on the street. It's rich, rich. Because of that, if you aren't rich, rich, your kids probably aren't going to have a good experience going to school there.

3. Hoover

Similar to Vestavia and Mountain Brook in opportunities. I'd definitely vote Spain Park over Hoover. Problem with Hoover is that it's REALLY big, and your kid can get lost there. I mean, if they want to play football, they better be really really fricking good at football if they're going to Hoover High School. There are also some pockets of Hoover schools that aren't good. Green Valley Elementary for example has a pretty low rating and has a lot of low-income students. However, Hoover City does offer real diversity where Vestavia and Mountain Brook are primarily lily white and Asian.

4. Oak Mountain

I'm tempted to put Thompson here, but I'll still go with Oak Mountain. OM has lost some funding because Pelham and Thompson pulled out of Shelby County. (Don't forget Helena is an option too in Shelby County.) OM though has GREAT parent support and a strong student body. Lots of good teachers move into the OM system because it's an affordable area and close to a lot of affordable areas. Teachers can bring their kids to Shelby County Schools, so that's always going to attract good teachers. Vestavia and Hoover do as well, but it's hard to find affordable housing for teachers in and around Vestavia. Mountain Brook doesn't allow teachers to bring their kids to the district.

5. Thompson

It's a state-of-the-art facility, but it's in Alabaster. There's nothing fun about Alabaster. It used to be called the armpit of the Birmingham area. It's very suburban with some low-income areas. If you like strip malls and franchise chain restaurants, Alabaster is your friend. But Thompson has put a ton of money into extracurriculars. I can't speak for the quality of the education.

6. Pelham

I'm not hearing good things about Pelham. It used to be one of the larger schools in the area, but after splitting into Oak Mountain and Helena, it's now a small school. I have quite a few coworkers and friends who taught in the system and not one of them has good things to say about working there. Grad rates are good though, so I'm sure you'd be fine.

7. Chelsea

I don't know anyone who teaches there, but I know a few alum. It's like a rural suburb. You're way out there. I wouldn't even consider yourself Birmingham if you live in Chelsea.

As always, the quality of the school will be mostly determined by parental support and quality of student. Out of the entire list, Vestavia and Mountain Brook are at the top. Hoover is a close third. The other four are pretty far away in terms of quality.

Hope this helps.
This post was edited on 7/5/20 at 2:12 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram