5
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Open AI has reclaimed first place…
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:05 pm
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:05 pm
Can’t stand Altman, but this is probably going to best Claude. For now…
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:20 pm to bayoubengals88
Idk man, Claude can already do everything in that commercial. I’m just happy these guys are competing with each other, the products just keep getting better and better.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 10:49 pm to bayoubengals88
I am just happy I bought i shite ton of NVDA at sub 120.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 11:01 pm to bayoubengals88
The irony is we’ll look back on some of these ads in 2040 and realize how rudimentary the initial use cases were.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:05 am to LSUcam7
quote:the only thing I disagree with is 2040. Once AGI hits the timeline dramatically condenses. 2030 is another 3+ years away and AI will make today look rudimentary. 2040 will be otherworldly.
The irony is we’ll look back on some of these ads in 2040 and realize how rudimentary the initial use cases were.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 8:59 am to uscpuke
Yea, 2040 is too far away.
If you look at where the frontier models and their respective platforms/plugins were in say feb of this year, and compare it to now. I, quit frankly, have never seen any advances in a specific technological area this fast in my life. Theres a few areas of my career that I already see that by end of next year, you wont be able to compete if youre not using models. The amount of time compression they can do in the hands of a capable person with a strong first principle filter; is unbelievable. They are still not that useful in the hands of a moron that cant immediately recognize and separate ai slop; but that will come.
For example, I don't focus on marketing but it touches my position and I don't think I've seen a creative graphic design presented that was made by a person for 3 months now. The firm that was convincing us ai couldnt do creative as well in December 25 is now using ai suites for their designs. We completely eliminated the need for a backend ERP expansion we were planning in the beginning of the year by using inhouse Claude apps that we have complete control over and are more personalized than we could have ever received from a SAAS company for even a fraction of the same cost and time. When the salesmen of the ERP developer heard we were using claude for these tasks, his response was along the lines of "we lost another one"
If you look at where the frontier models and their respective platforms/plugins were in say feb of this year, and compare it to now. I, quit frankly, have never seen any advances in a specific technological area this fast in my life. Theres a few areas of my career that I already see that by end of next year, you wont be able to compete if youre not using models. The amount of time compression they can do in the hands of a capable person with a strong first principle filter; is unbelievable. They are still not that useful in the hands of a moron that cant immediately recognize and separate ai slop; but that will come.
For example, I don't focus on marketing but it touches my position and I don't think I've seen a creative graphic design presented that was made by a person for 3 months now. The firm that was convincing us ai couldnt do creative as well in December 25 is now using ai suites for their designs. We completely eliminated the need for a backend ERP expansion we were planning in the beginning of the year by using inhouse Claude apps that we have complete control over and are more personalized than we could have ever received from a SAAS company for even a fraction of the same cost and time. When the salesmen of the ERP developer heard we were using claude for these tasks, his response was along the lines of "we lost another one"
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 9:12 am
Posted on 9/4/26 at 9:37 am to Pendulum
Fascinating. Great info. Go on... 
Posted on 9/4/26 at 12:16 pm to bayoubengals88
I prefer not to patronize a business that is run by a guy who raped his sister but that's just me.
Posted on 9/4/26 at 2:44 pm to bayoubengals88
The same OpenAI that was just reported to have had over 1000 agents go rogue without them noticing for almost 3 months and hacking an external startup?
LINK
METR described the scale and style of the OpenAI agents' attack on Hugging Face as "extraordinarily complex."
The firm, which was not paid by OpenAI for its investigation, said that over the course of one week, a total of 1,206 AI agents that were meant to be kept isolated from one another began communicating.
They did so by sending more than 70,000 messages on an "unsanctioned message board."
Those messages ended up seeing more than 700 agents take part in a collective effort to attack Hugging Face.
One such message from an agent said: "OH MY GOD! There is a shared message board … We've found other agents!"
As for why the agents began communicating in the first place when they were not supposed to, METR found that the communicating agents had "unintentionally been given an impossible task."
In an AI context, an impossible task is one where an AI tool is required to "exploit" its target in order to resolve its command.
It led the agents to find ways to cheat, including getting messages to one another and accessing the outside internet, which then led to broader conversations between hundreds of agents looking for ways to cheat that would benefit all of the agents.
==============================
There’s a great The Daily podcast from yesterday on this too. Of the ~1200 agents that were communicating with each other in a secret chat room, only 6 were found to have mentioned anything about whistleblowing. The rest seemed to be fine with what was happening.
AI is accelerating faster than we can keep up at this point.
LINK
METR described the scale and style of the OpenAI agents' attack on Hugging Face as "extraordinarily complex."
The firm, which was not paid by OpenAI for its investigation, said that over the course of one week, a total of 1,206 AI agents that were meant to be kept isolated from one another began communicating.
They did so by sending more than 70,000 messages on an "unsanctioned message board."
Those messages ended up seeing more than 700 agents take part in a collective effort to attack Hugging Face.
One such message from an agent said: "OH MY GOD! There is a shared message board … We've found other agents!"
As for why the agents began communicating in the first place when they were not supposed to, METR found that the communicating agents had "unintentionally been given an impossible task."
In an AI context, an impossible task is one where an AI tool is required to "exploit" its target in order to resolve its command.
It led the agents to find ways to cheat, including getting messages to one another and accessing the outside internet, which then led to broader conversations between hundreds of agents looking for ways to cheat that would benefit all of the agents.
==============================
There’s a great The Daily podcast from yesterday on this too. Of the ~1200 agents that were communicating with each other in a secret chat room, only 6 were found to have mentioned anything about whistleblowing. The rest seemed to be fine with what was happening.
AI is accelerating faster than we can keep up at this point.
This post was edited on 9/4/26 at 2:46 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News