re: Let’s talk weed stocks in this thread

quote:

---

which tripled.

---

I hate pump and dump scammers so much it's just downright dishonest to mislead people

The SCF says it was issued with the debt …. you know the debt that theoretically doesn't have a stated conversion term but everyone and their dog knows it will be converted…. there are hundreds of millions of CSEs out there, if not in name.

Hell the one note they borrowed in Q1 for $500K already matured... we all know that will settle in equity eventually but folks like Dad can be tricked with no dilution in the meantime.

Here we are on day 2 of LVVV revenue extravaganza. The longs on IH still haven’t figured out that the price won’t move because they are all trading with each other

quote:

---

price won’t move

---

42% in 2 hours and 50% since yesterday’s open isn’t exactly “not moving”.

Hit .0185 so far today.

Anyone else in Valens? What’s been going on with it the past month?

Come on $0.02! I'm out of that happens, will take my loss and move the frick on.

quote:

---

Come on $0.02! I'm out of that happens, will take my loss and move the frick on

---

Yes! Now that they he company is actively in business and beginning to produce revenue, it’s time to bail!

That’s my long strategy too - invest on what I hope they will do, then bail when they actually start doing what I invested for.

I do the same when I bet on LSU games - I lay down my money, but once they start scoring touchdowns I beg for my money back.

quote:

---

That’s my long strategy too - invest on what I hope they will do, then bail when they actually start doing what I invested for.

---

Was that your strategy with the stock you have bragged about several times where you ultimately went from $800 to $0.05 currently... yet somehow that is a bragging point of yours? "If you weren't gullible like me, you could have made money at some point". Sounds so different then your argument with LVVV

Or is this you diversifying your brilliance?

Any thoughts on the fact that no cash seemed to come with the revenue? Any thoughts of that with no cash and comparable COGS that is seems like a bit of a gross up? Any thought on the missing $6 million asset? Any thought they have haven't had revenue survive an audit since 2015? Any thoughts... at all... while you take a shot at someone who is thinking?

Oh yes, you don't care about any of that... as long as Bill pinky promises the sales occurred that is good enough for you.

As for your football analogy, I just heard LSU put on 49 against Bama last year. Trust me they did.

quote:

---

Was that your strategy with the stock you have bragged about several times where you ultimately went from $800 to $0.05 currently... yet somehow that is a bragging point of yours? "If you weren't gullible like me, you could have made money at some point". Sounds so different then your argument with LVVV

---

I put $800 in that stock and treated it like a slot machine.

When I go to the casino, I’ll put a few hundred bucks in the slot machines. At some point I’ll usually be up, but I don’t play slot machines to win a few hundred bucks. I play for the enjoyment and the chance to hit the jackpot. I plan on going home with $0 or a jackpot - nothing in between. Same thing with that penny stock. I didn’t care if I lost that $800 because I could afford to - I bought that stock for the chance at hitting 10x that amount. That stock tip came from an uncle who made 25x his money on a company run by the same guy that stock was under. And that’s why I can laugh about it and post it on a message board. If I felt bad about losing that money, would I have posted about it on a public forum?

You can yuck it up all you want about this stock. After dropping to nearly subpenny in recent weeks, today it bounced to .0185 in a couple hours on news of modest revenue. And the question about the $6 million for the ranch was posted on ihub and newsflash: no one cared. Because the people buying and selling the stock are oblivious to the details. And that’s the “hard core” LVVV guys on ihub. Most investors are even more oblivious than they are. That’s why the share price reaction was minimal yeaterday after the 2nd quarter report hit ihub, but the reaction was immediate after the press release today. Today the news reached a larger audience, and that audience doesn’t even read the financials like the ihub guys sorta do. Investors are NOT that informed and do not know or do not care about the details of the financial statements - they only care about revenue.

That’s what you don’t get. It’s not that I don’t give validity to all the great points you bring up about the financials, and I’ve told you this before. It’s your conclusions that I don’t agree with. Will all the tomfoolery with the books affect the company 5 years down the line? Certainly. But the share price will pop long before then. You see the pop that yesterday’s revenue announcement caused. Now it will fizzle out. But then the 3rd quarter will be even higher, and by that time, despite Bill’s shenanigans, the Paso Robles nursery ought to be up and running. And if not, then it will by the next quarter. Or the next. But when you have quarterly statements showing significantly increasing revenue AND photos of a 25,000 sq. ft. nursery full of plants, that’s when it will really take off. Will it be a dollar, or 2, or 10? Doubtful, which is why we kept talking about this being a “lottery ticket”. But it WILL show 50 or 100 or 200 or 300% gains. And that will be more than enough to satisfy most people (including me since I invested more than just $800 in this one). And if they luck into a major partner on that $6 million dollar ranch that’s unaccounted for in the financials (which even the gung-ho investors don’t care about), THEN it might be that lottery ticket stock.

TL/DR: You’re applying far too much logic to a penny stock.

1). When you put a few hundred in a slot machine - and lose it - do you tend to brag constantly that You tripled? Because that is what you did here.

2). I said from day one this is a viable pump play ... ie details not important - shenanigans could win short term. You were the one that argued it was legit, done the right way, several dollars etc...

If your position was this is a bullshite pump and dump show - enjoy the ride - we would have been in the same parlor long ago.


But you have been vehement this is legit future billion dollar enterprise. That is what we have been debating - not whether your fellow longs on IHub can process a rationale thought - we know they can’t.