Started By
Message

re: How much life insurance do you have?

Posted on 5/9/23 at 6:51 am to
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14227 posts
Posted on 5/9/23 at 6:51 am to
Around $750k. I have two teenage boys and that should be enough to pay off the house and get them through school. Wife would probably have to get a job but she should do that anyway.
Posted by dat yat
Chef Pass
Member since Jun 2011
4320 posts
Posted on 5/9/23 at 9:18 am to
My kids are grown, it's just me now and I have no debt, so the 1x-salary policy at work is all I need.

If you have 3 kids and are THE provider, you need $1MM or more depending on y'alls budget.
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27103 posts
Posted on 5/9/23 at 9:27 am to
Married, house, no kids. $1M 30 year term that started in my early to mid 30s and will run to my early to mid 60s.
Posted by SM1010
Member since Oct 2020
761 posts
Posted on 5/9/23 at 10:54 am to
250k and 1x work salary. Everything is paid off and no kids so no need for more than that.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32559 posts
Posted on 5/9/23 at 12:28 pm to
2 million, 20 year term privately
350k through work

I'll probably add another in the next 5 years that should get me to retirement age. By that time, if I die my wife should be able to live off of retirement investments.

Posted by ned nederlander
Member since Dec 2012
4284 posts
Posted on 5/9/23 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

got a 325k life policy that's cheap. $335 a year but thinking I want to get another one to increase it.

I have 3 kids but I'm the only provider at the current time. I don't think 325 would be enough if I was gone. Sizeable equity in 6-7 houses that could be sold but those would only be a stop gap.


my opinion of course, but I don’t think that’s nearly enough. The real estate assets are great, but a three child household losing their primary income needs more than $325. You don’t want your wife to have to look to offload real estate while burying you.

We have three young kids, both wife and I work and each have $2,000,000. I wish we had $3,000,000 and may look to increase it. My thinking is if one of us dies, the household is likely losing both incomes at least for a while.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39589 posts
Posted on 5/9/23 at 1:03 pm to
I'm kind of confused why a parent would insure a child. A child costs money and doesn't create income. It feels morbid, but as a cost issue your finances would improve on thr death of a child over time, so the insurance doesn't make sense to me. It's completely different than if I die and my policy is used to take care of my kids.

I've read that perhaps a better rate for the kid when they become an adult, but I doubt that's hugely beneficial considering all other factors.
This post was edited on 5/9/23 at 1:07 pm
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25669 posts
Posted on 5/9/23 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

I've read that perhaps a better rate for the kid when they become an adult, but I doubt that's hugely beneficial considering all other factors.


Lots of people are uninsurable.
Lots of people are expensive to insure.

Once you've checked off your top 50 financial goals, guaranteeing the insurability of your kids is not a bad thing.

My brother smokes, has had DUIs, and is underweight.
A policy when he was a kid would have significant value now that he has children of his own (he has coverage, but some carriers have declined him).

I agree. There should be little to no priority on it.

I don't have life insurance on my kids (other than the $25,000 provided by my employer for about $20/yr). I don't quite max out my HSA per year. I haven't hit that priority level financially speaking to do that for my children.
This post was edited on 5/9/23 at 1:35 pm
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32559 posts
Posted on 5/9/23 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

I'm kind of confused why a parent would insure a child. A child costs money and doesn't create income. It feels morbid, but as a cost issue your finances would improve on thr death of a child over time, so the insurance doesn't make sense to me. It's completely different than if I die and my policy is used to take care of my kids.

I've read that perhaps a better rate for the kid when they become an adult, but I doubt that's hugely beneficial considering all other factors.

I have a 25k policy on my daughter, at age 26 she can convert it to a 100k policy without having to pass any sort of health screening. So in the event that something occurs before then and she's uninsurable, at least she has this 100k policy.
Posted by concrete_tiger
Member since May 2020
6031 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 9:17 am to
Any recs on current best places to compare offers?

I definitely need to up what we have, and I don't think the rates thru USAA are the best I've seen.

I have enough to pay off all debt, but they'd be stuck on a teacher's income after that.
Posted by Popths
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
3969 posts
Posted on 5/10/23 at 4:52 pm to
Zero. Been retired and debt free for years. See no need for life insurance anymore. Am considered self insured.
Posted by CISO
ATX
Member since Nov 2021
1082 posts
Posted on 5/11/23 at 12:09 pm to
1 kid and 1 million
Posted by LSUtoOmaha
Nashville
Member since Apr 2004
26580 posts
Posted on 5/11/23 at 12:33 pm to
1.5 million on a 30 year term.
Posted by Spasweezy
Unfortunately, Louisiana
Member since Jan 2014
6621 posts
Posted on 5/11/23 at 1:21 pm to
2 million on a 20 year term. It’s cheap. Wife has 1 million on a 20 year term.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram