- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Haynesville Shale North of Benton??
Posted on 8/12/08 at 3:48 pm to Checkmateking2
Posted on 8/12/08 at 3:48 pm to Checkmateking2
Yeah, I'd say they have either seen something nobody else has noticed yet or they bought a speculative lease. Maybe they got access to some tighthole data on some recent wells in the area. Either way the landowners would have got a nice chunk of change.
Posted on 8/12/08 at 3:49 pm to TigerDog83
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/18/08 at 9:54 pm
Posted on 8/12/08 at 4:02 pm to Checkmateking2
My best friends aunt has a 900 Acre spread in Bethany, I am trying to get her to adopt me lol. What are the chances there could be shale which is disconnected from the core. Basically a rogue play, its hard to tell exactly where certain mudholes were 150 million years ago? I know it sounds impossible, but it could happen?
This post was edited on 8/12/08 at 4:11 pm
Posted on 8/13/08 at 3:20 pm to Checkmateking2
new group for Benton/Plain Dealing and surrounding areas. cpa-mineralrightsgroup.com
Posted on 8/13/08 at 4:04 pm to MILR22
From that website...
Even land in north Desoto, south Caddo, and south Bossier has yet to hit $35,000 per acre bonus, what on Earth makes them think they can get even close to that in north Bossier. They should count their lucky stars if they can even get 15-20k per acre and 25% royalties.
quote:
Intended purpose of this group
To negotiate:
a bonus payment on a per acre basis (starting negotiations at $35,000);
the primary lease term and / or optional extension period;
the royalty percentage and terms (starting negotiations at 30%);
and other relevant and necessary lease terms.
Even land in north Desoto, south Caddo, and south Bossier has yet to hit $35,000 per acre bonus, what on Earth makes them think they can get even close to that in north Bossier. They should count their lucky stars if they can even get 15-20k per acre and 25% royalties.
This post was edited on 8/13/08 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 8/13/08 at 4:45 pm to GeneralLee
Since the cities of Bossier and Shreveport got absolutely NO BIDS today at the state lease sale, I doubt they get anything. They had a minimum of 27,500/acre and 27% but got no bids. They found out they aren't going to push the big boys around.
Posted on 8/13/08 at 7:02 pm to pittboss33
Pessimistic Pittboss again???? 
Posted on 8/13/08 at 9:17 pm to Flop
Hey Flop...thought PB said he wasn't going to post here anymore? Last I saw of him he was keeping the ARK. people depressed! 
Posted on 8/14/08 at 12:11 am to countryboy
If that is true abuot that website it is really somewhat ridiculous, he has to be joking?, I stand corrected, I cannot believe that, I mean come on, no one has fought as hard as I have to push this play north and come up with legitinate information. What I have said is the gospel truth,That is really ridiculous, they will never get a nibble now
35000 acre?
This post was edited on 8/14/08 at 12:16 am
Posted on 8/14/08 at 9:52 am to Checkmateking2
I've talked to someone who is one of the founders of the group, and he said that of course we are not going to get 35,000 and acre, we know that but its just our starting point. I would think, even though it sounds CRAZY, that starting high is better than starting low...
Posted on 8/14/08 at 10:20 am to pittboss33
PB, it's interesting that Desoto Parish got $27K and a 1/3 Royalty.
This post was edited on 8/14/08 at 10:21 am
Posted on 8/14/08 at 10:27 am to gingles
quote:
PB, it's interesting that Desoto Parish got $27K and a 1/3 Royalty.
Wrong. They got 30% (Not 1/3) on a .14 acre tract. Other than that most of the bids were in the 25% - 27.5% range. 1/3 would equate to 33.3%.
Posted on 8/15/08 at 9:21 am to TigerDog83
Tiger Dog,
Any recent info on where the NE limits of the play appear to be solid? In particular, on the border of Webster/Lincoln Parishes, due east of Minden.
Have friends with acreage now starting to get offers in the $5,000 range (up from $1,500 last month), which appears to be the only area that I'm hearing where prices are getting a bit stronger.
Any recent info on where the NE limits of the play appear to be solid? In particular, on the border of Webster/Lincoln Parishes, due east of Minden.
Have friends with acreage now starting to get offers in the $5,000 range (up from $1,500 last month), which appears to be the only area that I'm hearing where prices are getting a bit stronger.
Posted on 8/15/08 at 1:57 pm to TigerStuckinOkieland
Petrohawk doesn't consider the shale to be present in Terryville, and I would be inclined to believe them. They have drilled a ton of wells to the smackover gray sand and would have drilled through the Haynesville section on every one of them. It will probably take some drilling to see what is productive in southern Webster. From what I have seen there is no basis for Lincoln and Caldwell parishes to be included in the Haynesville shale area as the Louisiana conservation map indicates. Of course the LOC is usually a lot slower in finding out what's going on than everybody else.
This post was edited on 8/15/08 at 1:59 pm
Posted on 8/18/08 at 9:59 pm to TigerDog83
A noted geologoist has said it is present in Terryville field, Petrohawk? They are liars when it comes to Haynesville Shale? This has been proven by log? I mean when millions of dollars are at stake why lie?

This post was edited on 8/19/08 at 9:10 am
Posted on 8/18/08 at 10:02 pm to Checkmateking2
Do not listen to Petrohawk or their employees when your mineral rights are on the line, they are in the business to make money, I guess Tigerdog wasnt privy to that log? If Petrohawk doesnt consider HS to be anywhere I guess they could lease all the land for dirt cheap and screw everyone huh? Tigerdog said the zone does not exist in Terryville and another noted Geologist does, shame shame shame, we are talking about poeples living not making money for big gas, I am for the landowner,a noted geologist has read a log and says there is a Haynesville Shale zone in the Terryville field, if Tigerdog knows so much why would he go with what "Petrohawk says" They are the ones who want to lease the land and drill. Insider trading is insider trading, the US attorney general is already reviewing cases. You have thousands of poeple who have worked their arse off for decades to own a tiny piece of America and now we have thousands of sharks ready to screw them out of it, do not be eaten!
This post was edited on 8/19/08 at 9:10 am
Posted on 8/19/08 at 8:34 am to Checkmateking2
I certainly don't work for Petrohawk. And if the shalegeo you are talking about is the one on the rumor mill site known as gohaynesvilleshale.com be careful. I've seen him post some statements most people don't agree with. And I never said the zone didn't exist in Terryville, although in my opinion it's rather unlikely. There haven't been any Haynesville shale completions over there, not even from a vertical well. Petrohawk isn't the only operator over there either.
This post was edited on 8/19/08 at 9:38 am
Posted on 8/19/08 at 9:12 am to TigerDog83
Well I am sure geologist's have differences of opinion, but as you have stated on here time and again log's and other types of hard evidence are hard to argue with. Sorry about the earlier rant.
Posted on 8/19/08 at 9:34 am to Checkmateking2
Yes, but I've seen the log in question and I don't follow where he comes up with the supposed shale zone. For one thing it appears to be located too deep to be Haynesville. It's also a very old log which really doesn't give you a whole lot to work with. Without a porosity log it is impossible to tell. Lots of opinions, but his opinion is not shared with many of the operators in that area. Also people don't read logs, they interpret logs. Keep in mind that although many people think these public companies are lying about all kinds of things, they have an obligation to keep their shareholders informed about what they are doing. They can't spend these kinds of dollars without justifying it to shareholders. If they were spending money to drill for the Haynesville shale in Terryville, they would have to acknowledge this to their shareholders. This hasn't happened.
This post was edited on 8/19/08 at 9:44 am
Posted on 8/19/08 at 9:54 am to TigerDog83
well theyve only drilled a million or so gray sand wells in that area, no recent logs?
Popular
Back to top


1


