Started By
Message

re: Getting paid "under-the-table"

Posted on 11/23/11 at 10:44 am to
Posted by Cold Cous Cous
Bucktown, La.
Member since Oct 2003
15049 posts
Posted on 11/23/11 at 10:44 am to
quote:

Humans respond to incentives.

Of course. But not all incentives are economic. Some are internally generated, and they are particularly relevant to this discussion because the income tax is, to a large extent, self-reported.

The argument about the toddler is a red herring. I have no idea what you're talking about, but I assume it has something to do with a risk that helping the toddler would get you in trouble with the secret police or something. Obviously moral values are not some absolute trump card that overrides every other potential incentive, and the risk of getting in trouble with the Party is a serious incentive indeed. But those moral values are part of the equation, more, I think, than you're giving them credit for.
Posted by Tiger JJ
Member since Aug 2010
545 posts
Posted on 11/23/11 at 10:56 am to
quote:

because the income tax is, to a large extent, self-reported.




Are you referring to the OP or to the average taxpayer?

quote:

The argument about the toddler is a red herring. I have no idea what you're talking about, but I assume it has something to do with a risk that helping the toddler would get you in trouble with the secret police or something. Obviously moral values are not some absolute trump card that overrides every other potential incentive, and the risk of getting in trouble with the Party is a serious incentive indeed. But those moral values are part of the equation, more, I think, than you're giving them credit for.


It's not a red herring - it's exactly applicable. It's very easy to morally grandstand when the cost of being "immoral" is very high (in some cases in this country you can make money off the "moral" action as you can perhaps cash in on 15 minutes of Good Samaritan fame).

What you are saying is more true for acts inflicted directly on specific individuals. And I mostly agree with you. But not paying taxes is viewed in a different light by most people because the "victim" is much more nebulous than one guy who had his money stolen from him. That's why the Madoff example isn't comparable to even the shoplifting example that was proffered.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 11/23/11 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

I guess you got the idea from me to laugh at the other idiot.

Now that Rivers is banned, you're the only idiot I laugh at on this board.
Posted by Tiger JJ
Member since Aug 2010
545 posts
Posted on 11/23/11 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

Now that Rivers is banned, you're the only idiot I laugh at on this board.


I consider it a high compliment coming from the ultimate POS.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 11/23/11 at 5:33 pm to
You're welcome!
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124142 posts
Posted on 11/23/11 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

quote:

Now that Rivers is banned, you're the only idiot I laugh at on this board.



I consider it a high compliment coming from the ultimate POS.
Now, now children Behave yourselves!
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 11/23/11 at 5:34 pm to
But daddy, he started it!
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 11/23/11 at 7:56 pm to
quote:

But the reason you go 65 instead of 79 is because you don't want a speeding ticket.


Speaking for myself, I rarely exceed 10mph over the speed of surrounding traffic because that isn't terribly safe. I almost never travel under the speed of surrounding traffic b/c that poses an even more serious road hazard.

Fear of a speeding ticket has nothing to do with it. In practice, cops tend to pick out those who stand out from the crowd and the posted limit has little to do with their target selection.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 11/23/11 at 8:00 pm to
quote:

quote: I did look at her green card. Wow


Yep. I'll admit that she was eager to show it, I guess she had her own incentives.
Posted by CP3LSU25
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
51150 posts
Posted on 11/24/11 at 9:46 pm to
Lots of coaches in high school get paid under the table, should they report it.
Posted by olgoi khorkhoi
priapism survivor
Member since May 2011
14886 posts
Posted on 11/26/11 at 12:14 am to
I talked to my CPA and he straightened me out. Like most of you, he was a little bit of an a-hole about it.

Now call Shanequia and let her know her welfare check is safe.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 11/27/11 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

I talked to my CPA and he straightened me out. Like most of you, he was a little bit of an a-hole about it.


That's b/c he could lose his license if he didn't. If you tried to do it he could not have signed the paperwork. That is not being an a-hole, that's just being smart. Why would he risk his livelihood over a client's desire to hide income?
Posted by ProbyOne
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2004
1915 posts
Posted on 11/28/11 at 9:41 pm to
quote:

I am trying to hide the profit
quote:

Any ideas on how to keep it as clean as possible


does not compute
Posted by kfizzle85
Member since Dec 2005
22022 posts
Posted on 11/28/11 at 11:48 pm to
This thread is generally terrible with everyone trying to act all high and mighty, but please let's not lose sight of the fact that you are in fact a gigantic tool.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram