- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Diving deeper on Standard Lithium?
Posted on 3/12/21 at 11:16 am to Drunken Crawfish
Posted on 3/12/21 at 11:16 am to Drunken Crawfish
A lil bump at mid day on a Friday seems different.
I like.
I like.
Posted on 3/12/21 at 11:41 am to Grassy1
Yep! It's time to make a move STLHF!!!! Let's Go!
Posted on 3/12/21 at 12:06 pm to Got Heeem
LOL back in this again. Lets go!
Posted on 3/14/21 at 2:58 am to My2ndFavCivilNgineer
reddit
Someone started a reddit thread on it now.
Someone started a reddit thread on it now.
Posted on 3/14/21 at 8:49 am to ReadyPlayer1
quote:
Someone started a reddit thread on it now.
Good catch. Good read.
Might get interesting soon.
Posted on 3/14/21 at 9:45 am to ReadyPlayer1
Getting noticed. That's a good thing.
Posted on 3/14/21 at 10:11 am to Auburn1968
Seems like this thread may be lacking without some discussion of a possible competitor.
Lake Resources
Here is one reddit poster's DD:
reddit post on LLKKF
Booo!!! Hisssss!!!!!!
Lake Resources
Here is one reddit poster's DD:
reddit post on LLKKF
Booo!!! Hisssss!!!!!!
Posted on 3/14/21 at 10:52 am to Grassy1
I wonder how much effect sourcing lithium from Argentina VS the US will have when taking the USMCA into account?
USMCA origin rules
quote:
Core Parts for use in passenger vehicles and light trucks: North American Content (Regional Value Content) required will rise to 73%/85% by 2023: The list of core parts for use in passenger vehicles and light trucks includes certain: engines, engine parts, vehicle bodies, gear boxes, drive axles, shock absorbers, lithium ion batteries and steering wheels. Depending on which method is used to calculate the North American content, in 2020, these parts will need to have 66% (net cost method)/76% (transaction method) North American content to qualify as "originating". Thereafter the content requirement will rise incrementally to 75% (net cost method)/85% (transaction method) North American content in 2023. There are some exceptions to these requirements;
USMCA origin rules
Posted on 3/14/21 at 11:00 am to Grassy1
As cheap as it is wouldn't hurt much to pick some up.
Posted on 3/14/21 at 11:06 am to Grassy1
Good find.. however his DD is off about SL....he said they only have one area of land in Nevada. Completely missed the Arkansas smackover site.
Posted on 3/14/21 at 11:07 am to Ballstein32
And he shits on standards claimed purity, but last week announced better than Lake.
This post was edited on 3/14/21 at 11:08 am
Posted on 3/14/21 at 11:24 am to Ballstein32
quote:
Good find.. however his DD is off about SL....he said they only have one area of land in Nevada. Completely missed the Arkansas smackover site.
I noticed that also, wanted to hear someone else's take on his slant. I considered chiming in on his thread, but I don't know my reddit username, but I welcome someone else to do so.
Posted on 3/14/21 at 12:19 pm to Grassy1
The comments from the LLKKF folks imply that they view STLHF as a similar company. They acknowledge that STLHF is a little further ahead of them (I think with respect to production scalability) but are optimistic.
19:30 compares STLHF with LLKKF
recent interview
I am not sure their funding situation is as favorable as STLHF. In the February interview above it is acknowledged they may do another stock offering later 2021 or early 2022 when uplisting the stock. They are talking about shareholder value but some dilution or possibly just a buyout strikes me as a bit more likely with LLKKF than STLHF.
All the same, Lake Resources looks like another good Lithium stock and the two companies appear to have fundamentally better technology than mining and evaporative extraction methods in terms of CO2 production and water consumption.
19:30 compares STLHF with LLKKF
recent interview
I am not sure their funding situation is as favorable as STLHF. In the February interview above it is acknowledged they may do another stock offering later 2021 or early 2022 when uplisting the stock. They are talking about shareholder value but some dilution or possibly just a buyout strikes me as a bit more likely with LLKKF than STLHF.
All the same, Lake Resources looks like another good Lithium stock and the two companies appear to have fundamentally better technology than mining and evaporative extraction methods in terms of CO2 production and water consumption.
Posted on 3/14/21 at 1:34 pm to molsusports
We discussed llkkf earlier in the thread. Sounded like they were a good bit behind stlhf but consensus was it doesnt hurt to own both
Posted on 3/14/21 at 1:37 pm to molsusports
quote:
The comments from the LLKKF folks imply that they view STLHF as a similar company. They acknowledge that STLHF is a little further ahead of them (I think with respect to production scalability) but are optimistic.
19:30 compares STLHF with LLKKF
recent interview
I am not sure their funding situation is as favorable as STLHF. In the February interview above it is acknowledged they may do another stock offering later 2021 or early 2022 when uplisting the stock. They are talking about shareholder value but some dilution or possibly just a buyout strikes me as a bit more likely with LLKKF than STLHF.
All the same, Lake Resources looks like another good Lithium stock and the two companies appear to have fundamentally better technology than mining and evaporative extraction methods in terms of CO2 production and water consumption.
I watched the first video you linked. Very good info. Likeable guy, easy to listen to. He was actually pretty pro-STLHF. Admits that his production is 2023- 2024. He also paints a beautiful picture for the demand of Li. Discusses how large vehicles need much larger batteries etc. Discusses some of the global politics of EV's.
I might grab a few shares of LLKKF while it's at 26 cents. But watching his interview just enhances my confidence in STLHF.
I plan to watch the second video soon.

Posted on 3/14/21 at 2:28 pm to GrizzlyAlloy
There has been a little conversation about the US trade barriers for Lithium and those are interesting to discuss. Keep in mind however that (in the short term of the next few years) the European requirements for both EV use and European produced Lithium may be the biggest variable.
Bigger markets in the United States, China (and someday perhaps India) will have bigger demands eventually. But in the near term the Europeans will have more regulatory fiscal penalties that seem likely to consume more Lithium and therefore drive up prices before the more phased in US auto conversion takes place.
It does not seem clear where that amount of appropriately produced (should not include mining given the coal/CO2 use) Lithium will come from. So far all the answers to that question seem to resemble hand waving more than certainty.
Bigger markets in the United States, China (and someday perhaps India) will have bigger demands eventually. But in the near term the Europeans will have more regulatory fiscal penalties that seem likely to consume more Lithium and therefore drive up prices before the more phased in US auto conversion takes place.
It does not seem clear where that amount of appropriately produced (should not include mining given the coal/CO2 use) Lithium will come from. So far all the answers to that question seem to resemble hand waving more than certainty.
Posted on 3/14/21 at 4:12 pm to molsusports
quote:
There has been a little conversation about the US trade barriers for Lithium and those are interesting to discuss. Keep in mind however that (in the short term of the next few years) the European requirements for both EV use and European produced Lithium may be the biggest variable.
Bigger markets in the United States, China (and someday perhaps India) will have bigger demands eventually. But in the near term the Europeans will have more regulatory fiscal penalties that seem likely to consume more Lithium and therefore drive up prices before the more phased in US auto conversion takes place.
It does not seem clear where that amount of appropriately produced (should not include mining given the coal/CO2 use) Lithium will come from. So far all the answers to that question seem to resemble hand waving more than certainty.
That begs the question, what is the immediate demand? And can STL indeed produce efficiently enough to take as much of that market as they want (or need) to take?
Posted on 3/15/21 at 10:21 am to Grassy1
Is this a good entrance price? Anything under $3?
Posted on 3/15/21 at 11:08 am to LSUGrad2005
Yep... if we have another market meltdown day it could dip to $2.40ish, but if JV news comes out I think this will blow past $4 and never look back.
Popular
Back to top
