Started By
Message

re: Diving deeper on Standard Lithium?

Posted on 3/12/21 at 11:16 am to
Posted by Grassy1
Member since Oct 2009
7319 posts
Posted on 3/12/21 at 11:16 am to
A lil bump at mid day on a Friday seems different.

I like.
Posted by Got Heeem
Georgia
Member since Sep 2012
3631 posts
Posted on 3/12/21 at 11:41 am to
Yep! It's time to make a move STLHF!!!! Let's Go!
Posted by BlackPawnMartyr
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2010
15821 posts
Posted on 3/12/21 at 12:06 pm to
LOL back in this again. Lets go!
Posted by ReadyPlayer1
Clown World
Member since Oct 2020
1082 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 2:58 am to
reddit
Someone started a reddit thread on it now.
Posted by Grassy1
Member since Oct 2009
7319 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 8:49 am to
quote:

reddit
Someone started a reddit thread on it now.



Good catch. Good read.

Might get interesting soon.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
23051 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 9:45 am to
Getting noticed. That's a good thing.
Posted by Grassy1
Member since Oct 2009
7319 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 10:11 am to
Seems like this thread may be lacking without some discussion of a possible competitor.

Lake Resources

Here is one reddit poster's DD:

reddit post on LLKKF

Booo!!! Hisssss!!!!!!
Posted by GrizzlyAlloy
Member since Aug 2020
2581 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 10:52 am to
I wonder how much effect sourcing lithium from Argentina VS the US will have when taking the USMCA into account?

quote:

Core Parts for use in passenger vehicles and light trucks: North American Content (Regional Value Content) required will rise to 73%/85% by 2023: The list of core parts for use in passenger vehicles and light trucks includes certain: engines, engine parts, vehicle bodies, gear boxes, drive axles, shock absorbers, lithium ion batteries and steering wheels. Depending on which method is used to calculate the North American content, in 2020, these parts will need to have 66% (net cost method)/76% (transaction method) North American content to qualify as "originating". Thereafter the content requirement will rise incrementally to 75% (net cost method)/85% (transaction method) North American content in 2023. There are some exceptions to these requirements;



USMCA origin rules
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
20045 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 11:00 am to
As cheap as it is wouldn't hurt much to pick some up.
Posted by Ballstein32
Member since May 2020
397 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 11:06 am to
Good find.. however his DD is off about SL....he said they only have one area of land in Nevada. Completely missed the Arkansas smackover site.
Posted by GrizzlyAlloy
Member since Aug 2020
2581 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 11:07 am to
And he shits on standards claimed purity, but last week announced better than Lake.
This post was edited on 3/14/21 at 11:08 am
Posted by Grassy1
Member since Oct 2009
7319 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Good find.. however his DD is off about SL....he said they only have one area of land in Nevada. Completely missed the Arkansas smackover site.



I noticed that also, wanted to hear someone else's take on his slant. I considered chiming in on his thread, but I don't know my reddit username, but I welcome someone else to do so.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36664 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 12:19 pm to
The comments from the LLKKF folks imply that they view STLHF as a similar company. They acknowledge that STLHF is a little further ahead of them (I think with respect to production scalability) but are optimistic.

19:30 compares STLHF with LLKKF

recent interview

I am not sure their funding situation is as favorable as STLHF. In the February interview above it is acknowledged they may do another stock offering later 2021 or early 2022 when uplisting the stock. They are talking about shareholder value but some dilution or possibly just a buyout strikes me as a bit more likely with LLKKF than STLHF.

All the same, Lake Resources looks like another good Lithium stock and the two companies appear to have fundamentally better technology than mining and evaporative extraction methods in terms of CO2 production and water consumption.
Posted by jimjackandjose
Member since Jun 2011
6631 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 1:34 pm to
We discussed llkkf earlier in the thread. Sounded like they were a good bit behind stlhf but consensus was it doesnt hurt to own both
Posted by Grassy1
Member since Oct 2009
7319 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

The comments from the LLKKF folks imply that they view STLHF as a similar company. They acknowledge that STLHF is a little further ahead of them (I think with respect to production scalability) but are optimistic.

19:30 compares STLHF with LLKKF

recent interview

I am not sure their funding situation is as favorable as STLHF. In the February interview above it is acknowledged they may do another stock offering later 2021 or early 2022 when uplisting the stock. They are talking about shareholder value but some dilution or possibly just a buyout strikes me as a bit more likely with LLKKF than STLHF.

All the same, Lake Resources looks like another good Lithium stock and the two companies appear to have fundamentally better technology than mining and evaporative extraction methods in terms of CO2 production and water consumption.




I watched the first video you linked. Very good info. Likeable guy, easy to listen to. He was actually pretty pro-STLHF. Admits that his production is 2023- 2024. He also paints a beautiful picture for the demand of Li. Discusses how large vehicles need much larger batteries etc. Discusses some of the global politics of EV's.

I might grab a few shares of LLKKF while it's at 26 cents. But watching his interview just enhances my confidence in STLHF.

I plan to watch the second video soon.

Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36664 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 2:28 pm to
There has been a little conversation about the US trade barriers for Lithium and those are interesting to discuss. Keep in mind however that (in the short term of the next few years) the European requirements for both EV use and European produced Lithium may be the biggest variable.

Bigger markets in the United States, China (and someday perhaps India) will have bigger demands eventually. But in the near term the Europeans will have more regulatory fiscal penalties that seem likely to consume more Lithium and therefore drive up prices before the more phased in US auto conversion takes place.

It does not seem clear where that amount of appropriately produced (should not include mining given the coal/CO2 use) Lithium will come from. So far all the answers to that question seem to resemble hand waving more than certainty.
Posted by Grassy1
Member since Oct 2009
7319 posts
Posted on 3/14/21 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

There has been a little conversation about the US trade barriers for Lithium and those are interesting to discuss. Keep in mind however that (in the short term of the next few years) the European requirements for both EV use and European produced Lithium may be the biggest variable.

Bigger markets in the United States, China (and someday perhaps India) will have bigger demands eventually. But in the near term the Europeans will have more regulatory fiscal penalties that seem likely to consume more Lithium and therefore drive up prices before the more phased in US auto conversion takes place.

It does not seem clear where that amount of appropriately produced (should not include mining given the coal/CO2 use) Lithium will come from. So far all the answers to that question seem to resemble hand waving more than certainty.



That begs the question, what is the immediate demand? And can STL indeed produce efficiently enough to take as much of that market as they want (or need) to take?
Posted by LSUGrad2005
Member since Aug 2018
727 posts
Posted on 3/15/21 at 10:21 am to
Is this a good entrance price? Anything under $3?
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36664 posts
Posted on 3/15/21 at 11:04 am to
I would say yes
Posted by GeneralLee
Member since Aug 2004
13877 posts
Posted on 3/15/21 at 11:08 am to
Yep... if we have another market meltdown day it could dip to $2.40ish, but if JV news comes out I think this will blow past $4 and never look back.
Jump to page
Page First 47 48 49 50 51 ... 946
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 49 of 946Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram