Started By
Message

re: Dividend Stocks

Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:11 pm to
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72618 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

So, you don't think it's a bad idea to use dividend stocks in a taxable account?




frick no. you can only put so much in non taxable accounts. why not use taxable? I sure as hell do. the tax rate on them is not bad. i cannot just dump 60k into dividend payers in a retirement account like i can in a taxable.
Posted by Volt
Ascension Island, S Atlantic Ocean
Member since Nov 2009
2960 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:14 pm to
Thanks for the response Russian.

I need to research more and I will, but I think I’ll go with what the majority of those here have been suggesting.

Or maybe I should just keep to mutual funds. I’ve done good on those so far.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34884 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 12:23 pm to


Fair point
Posted by SouthMSReb
Member since Dec 2013
4419 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

Thanks for the response Russian.

I need to research more and I will, but I think I’ll go with what the majority of those here have been suggesting.

Or maybe I should just keep to mutual funds. I’ve done good on those so far.


The answer to your original question would be the following:

You'll get more dividend income from Ford. Solely because they have a higher yield. For every dollar you put into ford, you'll receive ~7% back in the form of dividend.

That being said, it's never safe to buy a stock SOLELY because of the dividend yield. You also need to factor in the following: Ford does not regularly increase their dividend, O does. Eventually, if all else stays the same (which it doesn't), O will have a higher yield ON COST than your ford purchase because each quarter, O is increasing their dividend while F does not.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

Ford does not regularly increase their dividend, O does.
But O's current dividend payout is over 200% of their earnings per share. And they only have $6.7 million of cash on hand.

Maybe that's attributable to the industry they're in (huge amount of depreciation? ) but that jumps out at me. Is their dividend sustainable??
This post was edited on 12/28/18 at 1:56 pm
Posted by SouthMSReb
Member since Dec 2013
4419 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

But O's current dividend payout is over 200% of their earnings per share. And they only have $6.7 million of cash on hand.

Maybe that's attributable to the industry they're in (huge amount of depreciation? ) but that jumps out at me. Is their dividend sustainable??


I'm not sure if you're looking at the payout ratio from the correct measures?

With REITs, you have to calculate the payout ratio as: dividend/FFO. EPS is not the correct denominator.

EDIT: just checked. Their 2018 FFO guidance is 3.13-3.20 and their annualized dividend is 2.64.
This post was edited on 12/28/18 at 2:02 pm
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
18915 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 2:03 pm to
When thinking of dividend comparisons I like to think about what I'll make on $1,000.

No matter how much or little the stock costs it's all about the yield percentage.

If you buy 1k worth of stock yielding 10% then you'll get $100 that year

7% - $70

3.5% - $35

But yes, payout percentage and yearly increases is are two of the greatest factors when trying to build a dividend portfolio. Some have argued that V will be a great dividend player in 10-20 years so go ahead and start accumulating now even though the dividend is less than 2%.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 2:05 pm to
I going by what's on Yahoo Finance page. It shows O's dividend payout ratio is 221.48%.

But I suspect you're correct that because O is a REIT adjustments have to be made to accurately reflect the payout ratio for O.

LINK
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
18915 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

But I suspect you're correct that because O is a REIT adjustments have to be made to accurately reflect the payout ratio for O.

O website

Maybe you see something here that can help us?

Don't reit's have to payout 90% of their revenue? Maybe the number on Yahoo isn't adjusted?
Posted by SouthMSReb
Member since Dec 2013
4419 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 2:09 pm to
Yeah I think yahoo just defaults to EPS as denominator.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126962 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

Don't reit's have to payout 90% of their revenue?
I thought it was 90% of their profits, not revenue, to avoid paying federal income taxes on their earnings.

I remember when LAMAR Corporation (the billboard advertising company) changed their charter several years ago to become a REIT (I used to own shares in LAMAR) that the selling point to shareholders was the company wouldn't have to pay corporate federal income taxes if the company paid out 90% of its profits to shareholders.

Of course the shareholders would still have to pay fed income taxes on their dividends received but changing to a REIT would avoid the "double taxation" issue.
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
18915 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 2:19 pm to
I'm sure you're right. I'm not good with terminology, though that's a major difference

Funny you mentioned LAMR. I added it to my watchlist a couple of weeks ago after I found it on a stock screener for healthy dividends.
Posted by leoj
Member since Nov 2010
3106 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 3:00 pm to
For REITS you look at the AFFO payout ratio, or operating earnings. Any normal payout ratio will be over 100% for REITS.

Edit, just saw it was already posted. I have some graphics I can post later so I’m actually adding something to this conversation.
This post was edited on 12/28/18 at 3:01 pm
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 12/28/18 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

you can only put so much in non taxable accounts.


After tax Roth Conversions out if a 401k or traditional do away with those limits.
Posted by bayoubengals88
LA
Member since Sep 2007
18915 posts
Posted on 12/31/18 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

I have some graphics I can post later
Please do
Posted by Sho Nuff
Oahu
Member since Feb 2009
11917 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 2:39 am to
VZ and T have their ex dividend date coming up Jan 9.
Posted by ThatsAFactJack
East Coast
Member since Sep 2012
1539 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 9:03 am to
Anyone loading up on F right now? Hovering around $7.70 with a dividend yield of 7.64%
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34884 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 10:27 am to
I bought some of it the other day. No telling how much lower it might go, but it looks like a great value right now.
Posted by RidiculousHype
St. George, LA
Member since Sep 2007
10201 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 4:15 pm to
Liking these two
IRM
BX
Posted by Sho Nuff
Oahu
Member since Feb 2009
11917 posts
Posted on 1/3/19 at 11:05 pm to
I bought T and F today, didn’t want to wait anymore.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram