- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/6/09 at 9:20 am to stout
quote:k, you sure seem to know a lot about MJ. Big fan??
He mortgaged it.
Posted on 7/6/09 at 9:20 am to Golfer
quote:
it was a dick move.
why?
Posted on 7/6/09 at 9:20 am to Golfer
quote:
$47.5 MM, either way it was a dick move.
Paul could have bought it. Not a dick move just good business. Now if he had done it behind Paul's back like Paul like to claim....then yea that would be a dick move.
Posted on 7/6/09 at 9:21 am to stout
quote:he got into a bidding war with his friend to buy his friend's own music out from under him.
Numerous people said PM had the chance to buy it but didn't.
how is that not a dick move again?
Posted on 7/6/09 at 9:21 am to LSURussian
quote:
k, you sure seem to know a lot about MJ. Big fan??
There is a new MJ article everyday on Yahoo, my home page, I read them.
Posted on 7/6/09 at 9:21 am to stout
quote:
Paul could have bought it. Not a dick move just good business. Now if he had done it behind Paul's back like Paul like to claim....then yea that would be a dick move.
I actually agree. One of the only good business moves that MJ ever made in my opinion.
Posted on 7/6/09 at 9:22 am to manwich
quote:
he got into a bidding war with his friend to buy his friend's own music out from under him.
It's not like he got into a bidding war with someone who only makes let's say $200,000 a year. PM had the funds and decided that he didn't want to spend that much.
Posted on 7/6/09 at 9:22 am to stout
I think it was a dick move by MJ
Posted on 7/6/09 at 9:22 am to manwich
quote:
how is that not a dick move again?
I am sorry but friend or not Paul really can't be mad when he had the chance to buy it. At that point it was business.
Posted on 7/6/09 at 9:22 am to stout
quote:irrelevant here
just good business
Posted on 7/6/09 at 9:23 am to stout
Ah well, cable news is never wrong
pardon moi
pardon moi
Posted on 7/6/09 at 9:23 am to TigerPrincess
quote:
PM had the funds and decided that he didn't want to spend that much.
PM actually was worth mre than MJ at that point and could have easily beat him on the bidding.
Posted on 7/6/09 at 9:24 am to TigerPrincess
quote:
I actually agree. One of the only good business moves that MJ ever made in my opinion.
It's definitely gonna help his kids out....maybe they won't have to sell the right to his music prematurely.....I mean I personally don't think most of it is that great but it seems like the whole world is against me and if something that important to your family still belongs to you then you should try to hold onto it for as long as possible IMO
Posted on 7/6/09 at 9:24 am to stout
If Sir Paul had bought it, his bitch wife would probably own part of the catalog now. So it's for the best.
Trusting women, with ownership of things...silly.
Trusting women, with ownership of things...silly.
Posted on 7/6/09 at 9:24 am to CocomoLSU
quote:
I thought he ended up relieving that several years ago, and that Paul McCartney was trying to buy it..??
Maybe that never ended up happening though...
McCartney advised MJ that the best investment for a musician was music rights. So MJ told him he was going to buy the right to his (McCartney's) songs. he didn't quite pull that off but he did buy the majority of the Beatles catalog and MJ and SOny outbid McCartney and Yoko Ono in the process. That is where the issue turned sour, when MJ started licensing songs like "Revolution" to Nike and "Yesterday" to a ton of companies for commercials.
MJ then borrowed twice against his half of the catalog (Sony still owns the other half) so he couldn't give the rights back to McCartney even if he had wanted to.
Posted on 7/6/09 at 9:24 am to stout
quote:the point is that he shouldn't have had to
PM actually was worth mre than MJ at that point and could have easily beat him on the bidding.
Posted on 7/6/09 at 9:25 am to Unknown
quote:
Ah well, cable news is never wrong
pardon moi
It was on more than cable news. The AP ran an article on it and hence the term "estimated" so yea they could be wrong but it will still be worth something after his debt is cleared.
Posted on 7/6/09 at 9:27 am to stout
quote:
we can stop with the "Who is paying for this"....or "How can they afford that" MJ questions.
Both Michael and his father are pretty famous for stiffing people they owe money to though. Let's not forget that.
Popular
Back to top



1






