Started By
Message

re: Wow ESPN "Mel & Todd - dumb and dumber" ripping Mett right now.

Posted on 5/6/14 at 1:31 pm to
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
15729 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 1:31 pm to
As I understand it there's different reasons a test can be flagged. Dilution is one. Dilution with a trace of something is another. Seems like these 2 things are very different and a team would at least look into it before tossing them off their board. The Mel&Todd thing came off as a little "with huntish" with the way they were almost singling mett out
Posted by Stuckinthe90s
Dallas, TX
Member since Apr 2013
2748 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 1:31 pm to
Okay, since many of yall don't know this process here is how it goes. Athletes train hard, they drink a ton of water. When I was in school I had to retake 4 tests because they were too diluted. At the NCAA level that means nothing, 3 of them they caught it during my initial test inspection so I just drank some powerade and retested and hour later. On one I actually got word back that About a week later and retested. Dilution happens, its no big deal.

I am surprised that this would be labeled a positive test in the NFL but so what. He testes positive for drinking a ton of water, basically he testes positive for taking care of his body while he was undergoing intense rehab, sounds smart to me.


Just to clarify, no trainer is going to tell there athlete to lay off the water 24 hours in advance of a drug test. Infact every trainer I have ever dealt with, (high school college, US national team) will tell you that if your piss isn't crystal clear you weren't drinking enough water. Hell they used to hand out swatches to show you the shade your piss should be.
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

Because all the athletes but 10 passed! And they actually were working out.


Of the 10 who failed, how many had traces of banned substances in their urine?

In the past, how man "flagged" atletes were subsequently cleared?

But if it makes you somehow feel good let's convict him without further evidence.
Posted by massiveattack
CharLIT/Chapel Chill
Member since Oct 2010
11582 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 1:33 pm to
We're not talking about a full week window. All he had to do was not dilute his sample within 24 hrs.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
107923 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

Athletes train hard, they drink a ton of water. When I was in school I had to retake 4 tests because they were too diluted. At the NCAA level that means nothing, 3 of them they caught it during my initial test inspection so I just drank some powerade and retested and hour later. On one I actually got word back that About a week later and retested. Dilution happens, its no big deal.

I am surprised that this would be labeled a positive test in the NFL but so what. He testes positive for drinking a ton of water, basically he testes positive for taking care of his body while he was undergoing intense rehab, sounds smart to me.
Ditto. This is what leads me to believe 1 of two things:
1. Mett is lying and his dilution was for a masking agent, because the NFL allows for an immediate retest if over-hydrated.
2. The NFL has the dumbest drug testing policy for athletes I have ever seen and they count an "over-hydration" dilution as a failed test
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
40081 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

All he had to do was not dilute his sample within 24 hrs.

And he didn't. That doesn't automatically make him in the wrong, and doesn't mean we should jump to conclusions that he's trying to hide something.
Posted by Stuckinthe90s
Dallas, TX
Member since Apr 2013
2748 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

. The Mel&Todd thing came off as a little "with huntish" with the way they were almost singling mett out



Todd has had it out for mett since the beginning, so I'm not surprised. Didn't realise he was such a douche but whatever. Both these guys are going to surprised when mett goes as high as the pats first round or as low as the Vikings 3rd round pick.
Posted by JBeam
Guns,Germs & Steel
Member since Jan 2011
68377 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

doesn't mean we should jump to conclusions that he's trying to hide something.

Do you actually believe the dehydrated angle that his agent is pushing?
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18850 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Because all the athletes but 10 passed! And they actually were working out.


So. Why would that automatically mean that he would cut his water intake back?

All the test results say were that they were found to be diluted. I have no reason to read anything more into that.

If this would have happened to Spencer Ware last year I might have been skeptical because he had already failed a drug test at LSU.

However, if there is a plausible explanation for what happened, why should I assume the worst about someone with no (publicly) documented case of prior failed tests?
Posted by lsu2006
BR
Member since Feb 2004
40081 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

Do you actually believe the dehydrated angle that his agent is pushing?

I don't particularly care, to be honest. I think it is and will be a non-story.

But I just don't see the point in automatically assuming the worst. He didn't flat-out fail. Let's give some time for the smoke to clear and find out the facts before we question Mett and his camp's motives.
Posted by massiveattack
CharLIT/Chapel Chill
Member since Oct 2010
11582 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 1:37 pm to
If I'm Freak or Jernigan's agent, I'm throwing out the water story today as well.



The classic dehydration defense.
This post was edited on 5/6/14 at 1:42 pm
Posted by JBeam
Guns,Germs & Steel
Member since Jan 2011
68377 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 1:39 pm to
Exactly...
Posted by Dudebro2
San Diego
Member since Dec 2011
8967 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

His piss test was flagged because there wasn't enough urine. He drank too much water. His physician confirmed it.


Yes it was diluted you are correct he drank way too much water. The point is why did he drink that much water right before his drug test? Is it really because he was cramping up and dehydrated, when he did not work out at the NFL combine. Or what was it he was trying to hide. Probably PED's, if that is the case considering his major surgery probably not as big a character flaw as if it was some kind of dope.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
107923 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

Let's give some time for the smoke to clear
This post was edited on 5/6/14 at 1:44 pm
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18850 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

The point is why did he drink that much water right before his drug test?


Perhaps he has a shy bladder? Some drug tests require a person watch you pee to ensure that you aren't pouring something else into the cup.

Before a work mandated drug test I chugged a liter of water to ensure I would have to go. Never thought that could have made me look guilty.
Posted by massiveattack
CharLIT/Chapel Chill
Member since Oct 2010
11582 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 1:45 pm to
Shy bladder

This gets better and better
Posted by redfieldk717
Alec Box
Member since Oct 2011
28117 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

If I'm Freak or Jernigan's agent, I'm throwing out the water story today as well.



The classic dehydration defense.


that does not work if they tested positive for weed...mett did not test positive for anything
Posted by redfieldk717
Alec Box
Member since Oct 2011
28117 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

Yes it was diluted you are correct he drank way too much water. The point is why did he drink that much water right before his drug test? Is it really because he was cramping up and dehydrated, when he did not work out at the NFL combine. Or what was it he was trying to hide. Probably PED's, if that is the case considering his major surgery probably not as big a character flaw as if it was some kind of dope.


do you not think he was rehabbing his arse off even if he wasn't working out at the combine?

do you remember him participating in pro day? do you think he was able to do that by sitting on his arse all day like you think he is doing?

again, i don't know if he was trying to cover something up but this is retarded logic
Posted by 41bengal
Da' Ville
Member since Jun 2009
2109 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 1:47 pm to
They have all this access to the player when taking these drug test they didn't know if he had put water in the test or not. Come on just let them bring out the facts first before destroying his rep.
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18850 posts
Posted on 5/6/14 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

Shy bladder This gets better and better


You keep asking for reasons. Obviously the only thing you accept is a retest that comes back negative.

To each his own, but I don't see why you have to throw him under the bus.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram